Susan C. Rodriguez

“Plaintiff's Motion to Transfer (Doc. No. 13) is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to transfer this action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia.”

“The Magistrate Judge's M&R (Doc. No. 12) is ADOPTED; ... Defendants' Motion Dismiss (Doc. No. 9) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part”

“Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, (Doc. No. 11), is GRANTED, and the Amended Complaint, (Doc. No. 9), is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE”

“Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, (Doc. No. 16), is GRANTED pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2) and 12(b)(5), and this matter is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE”

“the undersigned respectfully recommends that: ... 2. ‘Plaintiff's [Second] Motion to Remand’ (Doc. No. 18) be DENIED AS MOOT.”

“the undersigned respectfully recommends that ‘NVR, Inc.'s Rule 12(B)(1), 12(B)(5) And 12 (B)(6) Motions To Dismiss’ (Document No. 5) be GRANTED... IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that ‘Defendant Kuester Management Group, LLC's Motions To Dismiss Complaint Pursuant To Rules 12(B)(1), 12 (B)(6) and 8’ (Document No. 16) be GRANTED... ‘Defendant Costner Law Office PLLC.'s Motion To Dismiss Complaint’ (Document No. 18) be GRANTED... ‘Defendant Flagstar Bank's Motion To Dismiss Complaint’ (Document No. 28) be GRANTED.”

“IT IS, THEREFORE ORDERED that the Plaintiff's Objections [Doc. 31] are OVERRULED; the Magistrate Judge's Memorandum and Recommendation [Doc. 29] is ACCEPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 25] is GRANTED, and this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.”

“Based upon the foregoing discussion, the Court OVERRULES Defendants' objections [ECF 38] and DENIES Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [ECF 31]. The matter is referred anew to Magistrate Judge Rodriguez in accordance with the original referral.”

“the Court hereby accepts the Magistrate Judge's recommendation that the Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment should be granted and this case should be remanded for further proceedings. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Memorandum and Recommendation [Doc. 15] is ACCEPTED, and the Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment on the Pleadings with Brief in Support of Remanding the Case to the Commissioner [Doc. 11] is GRANTED... the decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED, and this case is hereby REMANDED to the Commissioner for further administrative action.”

“For the foregoing reasons, the Court will adopt in part and reject in part the magistrate judge's recommendation, albeit on different grounds than those provided in the M&R. The Court will grant Dove's suppression motion as to evidence obtained pursuant to the state search warrant, but will deny his suppression motion as to evidence obtained pursuant to the federal search warrant.”

“IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that: 1. The Magistrate Judge's M&R, (Doc. No. 26), is ADOPTED; 2. The Plaintiff's ‘Motion to Remand, Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time, and to Impose Sanctions’ (Doc. No. 4) is DENIED.”

“Defendant's ‘Motion to Dismiss’ (Doc. No. 7) is administratively DENIED as moot without prejudice.”

“Defendants' Motion to Dismiss‘ (Doc. No. 13) is administratively DENIED as moot without prejudice.”