Edwin Yates Webb

How Judge Webb rules, drawn from 20 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Webb no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Position
district
Status
Deceased
Served
1919–1955
Appointed by
Woodrow Wilson (Democratic)
Commissioned
1919-11-05
Education
Wake Forest College, A.B. (1893); University of North Carolina School of Law (attended 1893–1894); University of Virginia School of Law (postgraduate study, 1896)
Signed orders read
20

How Judge Webb decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

In Gulledge, Webb found that a reasonable, good-faith basis for naming the resident railroad defendant supported remand.

“the court is of opinion that the plaintiff and his counsel acted in good faith and with a reasonable basis for their belief”

Procedural preferences

In Lucas, Webb dismissed an equitable tax challenge where state law supplied a complete refund remedy after payment under protest.

“The complainants do not claim, and in my opinion cannot claim, that they have not a plain, adequate, and complete remedy at law”

Cautions

In Cannon Manufacturing, Webb treated a local subsidiary as a separate entity for service of process despite the parent's ownership.

“Stock ownership by one corporation in another does not make the other a process agent.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Pennsylvania Threshermen & Farmers' Mut. Cas. Ins. v. Harrill
· 1952-08-08
Request for declaratory judgment (insurer) Granted

“it is not the duty of the plaintiff to defend the action brought by Guy Brown”

Counterclaim for declaratory relief (insured) Denied

“it is not the duty of the plaintiff to pay any recovery obtained in said action”

Interstate Commerce Commission v. G. & M. Motor Transfer Co.
· 1945-04-30
Request for injunction (Interstate Commerce Commission) Granted

“the defendant should be restrained from committing the acts complained of in paragraph 3 of the complaint.”

Bullington v. Angel
· 1944-08-03
Claim for deficiency judgment (plaintiff noteholder) Granted

“is entitled to a judgment for Three Thousand One Hundred Dollars ($3,100), and I have so ordered.”

Scott & Williams, Inc. v. Whisnant
· 1941-09-19
Request for injunction (patent owner) Denied

“Plaintiff is not entitled to any injunction against the defendants”

Request for accounting (patent owner) Denied

“nor to any accounting for profits or damages.”

Cathey v. City of Charlotte
· 1929-08-16
Motions to remand (plaintiff) Denied

“The motion to remand is therefore denied”

In re Hamrick
· 1932-02-13
Petition for review of bankruptcy order (objecting creditors) Denied

“the action of the referee in affirming said allotment of homestead is hereby approved and affirmed.”

Women's Catholic Order of Foresters v. Valleytown Township
· 1940-02-16
Claim for judgment on bond coupons (bondholder) Granted

“said plaintiff is entitled to recover judgment on the interest-bearing coupons described in the complaint”

Lucas v. City of Charlotte
· 1936-03-30
Request for injunction (photographers) Moot / procedural

“the court is constrained to dismiss the bill at the cost of the complainants.”

In re Kahn
· 1926-11-30
Objection to bankruptcy discharge (creditor) Denied

“It is therefore ordered that the bankrupt receive Ms discharge.”

In re Fleetwood of Hendersonville Hotel Corp.
· 1932-02-19
Exceptions to special master report (valid lien claimants) Granted

“wherein he holds that the lienors above named, except J. E. Moss Iron Works, shall share on a pro rata basis, are overruled and set'aside”

Gulledge v. Director General of Railroads
· 1921-01-07
Motions to remand (plaintiff) Granted

“the court is constrained to grant the motion to remand; and it is so ordered.”

Novocol Chemical Manufacturing Co. v. Powers & Anderson Dental Co.
· 1941-03-10
Patent infringement claim (patent owner) Denied

“am constrained to hold the patent void.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

No exact-name historical dockets were available, so caseload mix and case-duration analysis could not be computed.

A historical record

Judge Webb no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.