David C. Keesler

“recommending that Defendants’ Motion be granted in part and denied in part ... Defendants’ Motion Dismiss (Doc. No. 11) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as set forth in the M&R”

“recommends that the Court deny the Motion to Dismiss as to Defendant Town of Mooresville ... Defendant Town of Mooresville’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 32) is DENIED”

“grant the Motion to Dismiss as to Defendant Town of Mooresville Police Department ... Defendant Town of Mooresville Police Department’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 34) is GRANTED”

“The Motion of Defendant Elsevier Ltd. to Dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction [Doc. 42] is DENIED”

“[Doc. 47] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. ... the Motion is GRANTED with respect to the Plaintiff’s claim under the North Carolina Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practice Act, and such claim is DISMISSED. The Motion is DENIED with respect to the Plaintiff’s claim for defamation under North Carolina law”

“the M&R will be affirmed and the Motion to Remand will be denied ... The M&R is AFFIRMED and its findings and conclusions accepted after the Court’s de novo review; Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand (Doc. No. 5) is DENIED”

“recommended that the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment be granted because there was no genuine issue of material fact for trial and because Defendant would be protected by qualified immunity ... Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 84] is GRANTED; and this action is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE”

“the Memorandum and Recommendation (“M&R”) of the Honorable Magistrate David C. Keesler (Doc. No. 10), which recommends that the Commissioner’s decision be affirmed ... Defendant’s Motion to Affirm the Commissioner’s Decision (Doc. No. 8) is GRANTED”

“the Court will adopt the M&R in part and the Commissioner’s decision will be AFFIRMED ... Plaintiff’s Social Security Appeal (Doc. No. 7) is DENIED”

“the Memorandum and Recommendations (“M&R”) of the Honorable United States Magistrate Judge David Keesler to deny the Motion ... The M&R (Doc. No. 40) is ADOPTED; ... Plaintiff’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 21) is DENIED”

“the Honorable David C. Keesler, United States Magistrate Judge, was designated to consider this pending motion ... the Court accepts the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation that the Motion to Dismiss be denied ... the Magistrate Judge’s Memorandum and Recommendation [Doc. 62] is ACCEPTED; the Defendants’ Motion to ... Dismiss [Doc. 52] is DENIED”

“Magistrate Judge Keesler ... recommends this Court grant in part Defendant’s Motion with respect to all Lanham Act claims ... the Court ... ADOPTS the M&R ... the Court GRANTS Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Lanham Act claims WITH PREJUDICE”

“the Memorandum and Recommendations (“M&R”) of the Honorable United States Magistrate Judge David Keesler to in part grant and in part deny the Motions ... It will also adopt the M&R to the extent that it recommends denying Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss as related to the breach of contract and North Carolina wage violations as against KDP ... Defendant KDP’s Motions to Dismiss and to Strike Jury Demand (Doc. No. 19) are DENIED”