David Bryan Sentelle

How Judge Sentelle rules, drawn from 16 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Sentelle left this court for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled here.

Court
United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Position
District judge
Status
Elevated to D.C. Cir. 1987
Served
1985–1987
Appointed by
Ronald Reagan (Republican)
Commissioned
October 17, 1985
Education
University of North Carolina, B.A. (1965); University of North Carolina School of Law, J.D. (1968)
Signed orders read
16

About Judge Sentelle

David Bryan Sentelle was a judge of the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina. Appointed by President Ronald Reagan, Judge Sentelle received a commission on October 17, 1985. Judge Sentelle left the court on October 19, 1987 on appointment to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

How Judge Sentelle decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

In Gardner, Sentelle followed the state supreme court's treatment of latent disease rather than earlier federal predictions when construing the product statute of repose.

“this Court must disagree with the Hyer and Silver cases decided prior to the enlightenment offered by Wilder”

In McDowell, Sentelle reduced but allowed defense fees only after the trial evidence established that the civil-rights claim was groundless rather than merely unsuccessful.

“This Court expressly finds plaintiffs complaint here to be ‘groundless’ and ‘without foundation’”

Procedural preferences

In Gardner, Sentelle resolved the dispute by statutory construction and expressly declined to reach the alternative constitutional challenge.

“Since this Court now holds that the statute does not apply, it is not necessary to reach the constitutional question.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

United States v. Canane
B-CR-85-95 · 1985-11-27
Appeal from magistrate (United States) Denied

“the decision of the magistrate dismissing this prosecution is affirmed.”

Clary v. Bowen
Civ. A. A-C-85-439 · 1986-07-09
Social security appeal (claimant) Denied

“The Secretary’s decision is AFFIRMED.”

Ehlenbeck v. Patton (In re Patton)
A-C-85-369 · 1986-03-04
Bankruptcy appeal (debtor-appellant William M. Patton) Denied

“The decision of the Bankruptcy Court is AFFIRMED.”

Griffin v. Tenneco Resins, Inc.
A-C-85-294; A-C-85-295; A-C-85-155 · 1986-12-01
Motion to dismiss or for summary judgment (defendants in A-C-85-294) Granted

“defendants’ motions for dismissal are allowed by Order filed contemporaneously herewith.”

Motion to dismiss or for summary judgment (defendants in A-C-85-295) Granted
Motion to dismiss or for summary judgment (defendants in A-C-85-155) Granted
McDowell v. Moore
Civ. A. C-C-85-0373-M · 1986-05-15
Motion for attorney fees (defendants) Granted in part

“this motion will be allowed, though not in the full amount prayed by the defendants.”

English v. Pabst Brewing Co.
Civ. B-C-85-438 · 1986-10-08
Summary judgment (defendants) Granted

“This court, therefore, is awarding defendants summary judgment by Order filed contemporaneously herewith.”

Gardner v. Asbestos Corp., Ltd.
Civ. A. C-C-83-0723-P · 1986-03-04
Summary judgment (defendant Cassiar Mining Corporation) Denied

“defendant’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is denied.”

Livingston v. International Association of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Iron Workers
Civ. No. A-C-86-264 · 1986-10-31
Preliminary injunction (plaintiff bargaining-unit members) Granted

“the court will issue, and by Order filed contemporaneously with this memorandum has issued, the preliminary relief prayed by the plaintiffs.”

Champion International Corp. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
Civ. A-C-86-26 · 1986-12-01
Summary judgment (United States Environmental Protection Agency) Granted

“Based on the foregoing, the EPA is entitled to summary judgment”

Motion to supplement record (plaintiffs) Granted

“The motion is ALLOWED, and the items were considered in reaching this decision.”

Tarantino v. North Carolina
Civ. A. A-C-86-99 · 1986-07-09
Motion to dismiss or for summary judgment (State of North Carolina) Granted

“The motion to dismiss or for summary judgment of the defendant State of North Carolina is ALLOWED.”

Motion to dismiss or for summary judgment (District Attorney James T. Rusher) Granted

“The motion to dismiss or for summary judgment of the defendant James T. Rusher is ALLOWED individuálly and in his official capacity.”

Motion to dismiss or for summary judgment (Detective B.R. Baker Jr.) Granted in part

“The motion to dismiss or for summary judgment of the defendant B.R. Baker, Jr., Detective, Avery County Sheriffs Department, is ALLOWED in his official capacity and DENIED in his individual capacity.”

Hendon v. North Carolina State Board of Elections
Civ. A. A-C-82-357 · 1986-05-05
Summary judgment (plaintiffs) Granted

“That plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment is allowed.”

Champion International Corp. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
Civ. A-C-86-26 · 1987-02-03
Motion to withdraw mandate (plaintiff Champion International) Denied

“plaintiff’s motion for withdrawal of mandate is hereby DENIED.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

No exact-name federal docket records were returned for Sentelle's 1985–1987 district tenure, so no historical caseload mix is reported.

A historical record

Judge Sentelle left this court for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled here. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.