Hiram Hamilton Ward

How Judge Ward rules, drawn from 19 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Ward no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Position
district
Status
Deceased
Served
1972–2002
Appointed by
Richard M. Nixon (Republican)
Commissioned
1972-06-28
Education
Wake Forest College School of Law, LL.B. (1950)
Signed orders read
19

How Judge Ward decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

In Nelson, Ward allowed an amended wrongful-death theory where the prior administrative claim had already given the government notice of the incident and liability theories.

“Decedent’s ‘claim’ acquainted defendant with the incident out of which the present lawsuit evolved.”

Procedural preferences

In Witcher, Ward quashed defective service but allowed time to attempt another method before dismissing the case.

“since service on defendant might be accomplished by other means, the case should not be dismissed until plaintiff has had an opportunity to explore those methods.”

Cautions

In Fleming, Ward emphasized that an unopposed motion still required an independent merits determination.

“A motion is not granted simply because it is uncontested. The trial court must always make an independent determination that the motion is meritorious.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Macy v. United States Secretary of Health, Education & Welfare
· 1972-12-19
Motions to dismiss (Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare) Granted

“it is ordered that the defendant’s motion to dismiss be, and the same hereby is, allowed; and that the complaint be, and the same hereby is, dismissed with prejudice.”

Witcher v. Mac Tools, Inc.
· 1974-04-24
Motion to quash service (defendant tool manufacturer) Granted

“It is, therefore, ordered that the service on E. D. Michael, Jr., should be, and hereby is, quashed.”

Motions to dismiss (defendant tool manufacturer) Denied

“It is further ordered that defendant’s motions to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction and failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted are denied without prejudice to their being raised again should proper service be obtained.”

Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Unit of the North Carolina Ass'n of Educators v. Phillips
· 1974-09-18
Request for injunction and declaratory relief (public-school employee associations) Denied

“Plaintiffs’ request for injunctive and declaratory relief is, therefore, denied.”

Moore v. Davis
· 1976-08-12
Motion for voluntary dismissal (plaintiffs) Granted

“the motion of the plaintiffs for voluntary dismissal, which has been treated by the Court as a motion pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED.”

Simpson v. Hurst Performance, Inc.
· 1977-09-02
Summary judgment (defendant manufacturer) Granted

“It is, therefore, ORDERED that the defendant’s motion for summary judgment be granted and the action dismissed.”

Wilson v. Continental Group, Inc.
· 1978-05-12
Summary judgment (defendant employer) Granted in part

“defendant’s motion for summary judgment as to that portion of plaintiff’s action based on 42 U.S.C. § 1981 be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED”

Bledsoe v. Pilot Life Ins. Co., Inc.
· 1978-09-29
Summary judgment (defendant insurer) Granted

“the motion for summary judgment in favor of the defendant should be granted and the plaintiff’s action should be dismissed.”

Milos v. Spector Freight Systems, Inc.
· 1979-02-05
Summary judgment (defendant freight company) Granted

“defendant’s*, motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56, Fed.R. Civ.P., will be granted”

United States v. Parks
· 1980-04-07
Motion to reduce or modify sentence (criminal defendant) Denied

“IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the defendant’s motion be, and the same hereby is, DENIED.”

Fleming v. Apollo Motor Homes, Inc.
· 1980-07-02
Motions to dismiss (Maryland National Bank) Granted

“the defendant Maryland National Bank’s motions to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and for lack of personal jurisdiction be, and the same hereby are, GRANTED”

Motions to dismiss (Safford Mercury Lincoln) Granted in part

“the defendant Safford Mercury Lincoln’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction as to the plaintiffs’ claim under the Magnuson-Moss Act be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED, and that the remainder of Safford’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and its additional motion to dismiss for improper venue be, and the same hereby are, DENIED.”

Motion to dismiss for improper venue (Safford Mercury Lincoln) Denied

“the remainder of Safford’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and its additional motion to dismiss for improper venue be, and the same hereby are, DENIED.”

United States v. Welborn
· 1980-08-26
Summary judgment (United States) Granted

“the United States’ motion for summary judgment be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED”

Summary judgment (defendant Welborn) Denied

“the defendant Welbom's motion for summary judgment be, and the same hereby is, DENIED.”

Motion to dismiss counterclaim (United States) Granted

“the defendant Welborn’s counterclaim be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED without prejudice.”

Samuel v. Donovan
· 1981-04-27
Appeal of administrative civil penalties (farm-labor contractors) Granted

“the Court finds that the plaintiffs are entitled to *379judgment as a matter of law.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

The fixed five-case sample contained four land-related civil matters and one criminal matter; none had an electronic motion timeline.

A historical record

Judge Ward no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.