James Carroll Fox

How Judge Fox rules, drawn from 30 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Fox no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Position
district
Status
Deceased
Served
1982–2019
Appointed by
Ronald Reagan (Republican)
Commissioned
1982-09-30
Education
University of North Carolina, B.S. (1950); University of North Carolina School of Law, J.D. (1957)
Signed orders read
30

How Judge Fox decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

In Stevens, Fox treated counsel's combined failures to investigate, prepare, and evaluate a viable defense as constitutionally ineffective representation that prejudiced the plea.

“counsel’s lack of investigation, lack of preparation and his failure to make an informed evaluation of a potentially viable defense, when taken together, amount to ineffective assistance of counsel.”

Procedural preferences

In Currie, Fox favored resolving the dispute on its merits when setting aside default, while shifting the expense caused by the defendant's neglect to that defendant.

“resolution of the litigation on the merits weighs in favor of setting aside the default heretofore entered.”

Cautions

In LaRoque, Fox treated compliance with the federal tort-claim filing deadline as a jurisdictional prerequisite that equitable authority could not extend.

“The court’s equitable powers do not permit it to confer upon itself jurisdiction contrary to that proscribed by Congress.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Chapman v. Vande Bunte
· 1985-03-14
Motions to remand (plaintiff) Granted

“Chapman’s motion to remand will therefore be ALLOWED.”

Allied Distributors, Inc. v. Latrobe Brewing Co.
· 1993-10-08
Motions to dismiss (defendant brewer) Granted

“Latrobe’s Motion to Dismiss is ALLOWED and the complaint filed herein is DISMISSED in its entirety.”

Dukes v. Hunt
· 1996-12-26
Summary judgment (state respondents) Granted

“the respondents’ Motion for Summary Judgment is ALLOWED, and this action is DISMISSED.”

Arista Records LLC v. Gaines
· 2009-06-24
Default judgment (plaintiff record companies) Granted

“It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that:”

Stevens v. Johnson
· 1983-10-06
Petition for writ of habeas corpus (state parolee) Granted

“the writ is ALLOWED.”

Solomon v. Dixon
· 1989-09-05
Summary judgment (defendants) Granted

“defendants' motion to dismiss, or alternatively, motion for summary judgment, is GRANTED as to all of plaintiff's claims”

Howard v. Malcolm
· 1986-02-12
Summary judgment (defendant housing owner) Denied

“defendant’s motion for summary judgment is DENIED.”

Branch Banking & Trust Co. v. Columbian Peanut Co.
· 1986-11-26
Summary judgment (plaintiff bank) Granted

“BB & T’s motion for summary judgment for the conversion of its security interest in Sories’ peanut crop (the same being valued at $22,-678.01), is herewith ALLOWED.”

Summary judgment (defendant peanut company) Granted

“summary judgment was granted BB & T on its conversion claim and was granted Columbian on all remaining theories of recovery.”

Wiggins v. Heckler
· 1986-03-14
Motion for attorney fees (plaintiff benefits claimant) Granted

“plaintiffs’ motion for attorney’s fees under the EAJA is ALLOWED.”

Motion for attorney fees (plaintiff benefits claimant) Denied

“Plaintiffs motion for an award of fees by this court for work at the administrative level is DENIED.”

Miller v. Bowen
· 1986-03-21
Motion for attorney fees (plaintiff benefits claimant) Granted

“The reasonable value of the services rendered by plaintiff’s counsel properly taxable under the Equal Access to Justice Act is $2,405.00”

Motion for attorney fees (plaintiff benefits claimant) Denied

“To the extent plaintiffs counsel requests compensation for her time before this court, the motion is DENIED.”

Motion for attorney fees (plaintiff benefits claimant) Denied

“counsel’s request is also DENIED.”

Overton v. Tar Heel Farm Credit, ACA
· 1996-09-30
Motions to dismiss (defendant employer) Granted

“the defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Count One of plaintiffs Complaint for failure to state a claim is ALLOWED.”

Federal Land Bank of Columbia v. Bartlett (In re Bartlett)
· 1988-06-28
Bankruptcy appeal (creditor) Granted

“The Bankruptcy Court’s Order of July 31, 1987, therefore, is REVERSED.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

The five sampled terminated matters included a wage case, a contract case, two prisoner civil-rights cases, and a forfeiture or condemnation case. Administrative closing data were available, but no electronic entry timelines existed for motion or timing analysis.

A historical record

Judge Fox no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.