Sidney Carr Mize

United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi district Deceased · served 1937–1965 Appointed by Franklin D. Roosevelt (Democratic) 22 signed orders read

Judge Mize no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

How Judge Mize decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

Mize allowed targeted document inspection when the request showed good cause and was not a fishing expedition.

“The motion is not a fishing expedition, and it will be sustained.”

Mize treated material misrepresentations relied upon by an insurer as sufficient grounds for summary judgment.

“the Defendant is not precluded from taking advantage of the false and fraudulent statements made by the insured to the Company and upon which the Company relied and issued the policies.”

Procedural preferences

Mize applied jurisdictional statutes prospectively when retroactive application was not clearly authorized.

“this statute of 1940 must be given a prospective operation rather than a retroactive effect.”

Mize could deny immediate injunctive relief while retaining jurisdiction for later relief if circumstances changed.

“Although no injunctive relief should now be granted, this Court should retain jurisdiction over this action”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Muse v. Enochs
· 1958-08-22
Summary judgment (taxpayers) Granted

“the temporary injunction heretofore granted by this Court in this cause should be made permanent.”

Chaffee v. Johnson
· 1964-05-18
Motion for temporary restraining order (state criminal defendant) Denied

“Plaintiff’s motion for a tempoi’ary restraining order is denied.”

Mitchell v. Barbee Lumber Co.
· 1964-06-13
Motion to strike jury demand (Secretary of Labor) Granted

“petitioner’s Motion to Strike defendants’ demand for jury trial should be, and it hereby is, granted.”

United States v. City of Jackson
· 1962-04-26
Preliminary injunction (United States and federal agency) Denied

“Plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction should be denied.”

United States v. Cameron
· 1949-06-15
Motion to vacate sentence (federal prisoner) Denied

“the motion will be denied to set aside the sentence and judgment of conviction”

Meredith v. Fair
· 1961-12-12
Preliminary injunction (university applicant) Denied

“the motion for the preliminary injunction should be denied.”

United States v. Biloxi Municipal School District
· 1963-05-16
Motions to dismiss (school districts) Granted

“Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is sustained.”

United States v. Shaddix
· 1942-02-26
Demurrer (criminal defendants) Granted

“The demurrer, therefore, will be sustained.”

Moody v. New York Life Insurance
· 1958-04-26
Summary judgment (life insurer) Granted

“Judgment may be entered sustaining the motion for a summary judgment of the Defendant”

Summary judgment (policy beneficiary) Denied

“overruling the motion for summary judgment of the Plaintiff.”

Texaco, Inc. v. Pigott
· 1964-09-30
Summary judgment (Fernwood claimants) Granted

“the Motion for Summary Judgment must be sustained and judgment entered for the Fernwood Claimants”

Summary judgment (Walthall claimants) Denied

“dismissing the Cross Motion for Summary Judgment on behalf of the Walthall Claimants.”

New England Insurance Co. v. Cummings
· 1958-08-30
Motion for judgment notwithstanding verdict (insurer) Granted

“the motion now being considered, to set aside the verdict of the jury and to grant judgment for the Insurance Company, will be sustained.”

Motion for new trial (insurer) Denied

“The motion of the Insurance Company for a new trial will be overruled.”

Bolton v. O'Conner
· 1953-08-01
Summary judgment (employer) Granted

“Let the motion for summary judgment be-sustained and the complaint be dismissed.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

The reviewed opinions span civil, criminal, tax, insurance, patent, civil-rights, and procedural disputes. No historical docket timelines were available for broader caseload or timing analysis.

A historical record

Judge Mize no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.