James Donald Maxwell II

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi district Appointed by Donald Trump (Republican) 11 signed orders read

How Judge Maxwell decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

Enforces an arbitration agreement when the signed application clearly incorporates the agreement and delegates questions of arbitrability to the arbitrator.

“Because the arbitration agreement delegates gateway issues of arbitrability to an arbitrator, the Court need not decide which of Smith's claims are subject to arbitration.”

Treats standing as a threshold jurisdictional requirement and requires the plaintiff to identify a personal injury rather than assert the rights of others.

“the complaining party—Leflore County and Youth Court Judge James Littleton, in his official capacity—is not the alleged injured party”

Procedural preferences

Analyzes requests to revisit an interlocutory order under Rule 54(b), while looking to the considerations used for final-judgment reconsideration.

“Because the Court's previous order compelling arbitration was an interlocutory order, Rule 54(b) is more appropriate.”

Cautions

Requires strict compliance with the notice and factual-showing requirements for emergency injunctive relief.

“His failure to explain to this Court why notice should not be required is fatal to his TRO request.”

Warns that repeated filings containing fictitious legal authorities may lead to monetary, fee, or dismissal sanctions.

“Should Smith submit any pleadings with further citations to false legal authorities, he will face sanctions against him—up to and including monetary penalties, defendants' attorney fees, and dismissal of this action.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Littleton v. Leflore County, Mississippi
4:25-cv-00186-JDM-JMV · 2026-03-09
Motions to dismiss (defendants) Granted

“The motion to dismiss for lack of standing is GRANTED.”

Motion for sanctions (defendants) Denied

“But the motion for imposition of sanctions is DENIED.”

Motion for emergency hearing (plaintiff) Moot / procedural

“The Motion for Emergency Hearing filed in Cause Number 4:25-cv-186-JDM-JMV [186-5] and the Motion for Emergency Hearing filed in Cause Number 4:25-cv-187-JDM-JMV [187-7] are both DISMISSED.”

Motion for emergency hearing (plaintiff) Moot / procedural
Smith v. TD Auto Finance LLC
3:25-cv-00312-JDM-RP · 2026-02-13
Motion to compel arbitration (defendant TD Auto Finance LLC) Granted

“For these reasons, TD Auto Finance LLC's Motion [7] is GRANTED.”

Smith v. TD Auto Finance LLC
3:25-cv-00312-JDM-RP · 2026-04-14
Motion for reconsideration (plaintiff) Denied

“For these reasons, Smith's Motion for Reconsideration [38] is DENIED.”

Fondon v. White
3:26-cv-00019-JDM-JMV · 2026-03-17

The court adopted the recommendation and dismissed the complaint without prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction and failure to state a federal claim.

Ruiz v. Gottlieb
3:26-cv-00025-JDM-RP · 2026-02-25

The court dismissed the complaint without prejudice after it failed to state a plausible claim or establish federal jurisdiction and the plaintiff did not answer a show-cause order.

Campbell v. Huffman
3:26-cv-00078-JDM-RP · 2026-04-28
Habeas petition (petitioner) Moot / procedural

“That this petition will be transferred to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi”

Mendez v. Stoller
3:26-cv-00117-JDM-JMV · 2026-06-01

The court adopted the recommendation and dismissed the complaint with prejudice as frivolous and for failure to state a claim, while warning that further frivolous filings could lead to sanctions.

Fulmer v. EZ Auto, Inc.
3:26-cv-00121-JDM-RP · 2026-05-27
Motion for temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction (plaintiff) Denied

“For these reasons, Fulmer's Emergency Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction [7] is DENIED.”

Fulmer v. EZ Auto, Inc.
3:26-cv-00121-JDM-RP · 2026-05-29
Motion for temporary restraining order (plaintiff) Denied

“For these reasons, Fulmer's Renewed Emergency Motion for Temporary Restraining Order [13] is DENIED.”

Park v. Corcoran
3:26-cv-00138-JDM-RP · 2026-06-01

The court dismissed the action with prejudice because the short complaint was frivolous, failed to state a claim, and did not establish federal jurisdiction.

The State of Mississippi v. Bey
3:26-cv-00171-JDM-RP · 2026-06-24

The court remanded a removed traffic-citation proceeding because the notice established no federal-question, diversity, or civil-rights-removal jurisdiction.

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Median motion-to-ruling time: 48.5 days (N = 6).

The early assignment set includes civil-rights and employment cases, consumer and insurance disputes, habeas and prisoner matters, Social Security appeals, and commercial litigation.

Put Judge Maxwell's record to work

Ezel drafts and answers grounded in this exact profile: how Judge Maxwell actually rules, not a generic AI guess.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer is grounded in Judge Maxwell's own signed orders and cites them.