Scott Olin Wright

How Judge Wright rules, drawn from 20 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Wright no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Position
district
Status
Deceased
Served
1979–2016
Appointed by
Jimmy Carter (Democratic)
Commissioned
1979-09-26
Education
University of Missouri School of Law, LL.B. (1950)
Signed orders read
20

How Judge Wright decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

In the Medicaid reimbursement case, Wright found that rates could not be tested for adequacy until the state made the predicate findings required by federal law.

“Without such findings, it is not possible to determine whether the reimbursement rate established by DSS are reasonable and adequate to meet the reasonable costs that must be incurred by such facilities.”

Procedural preferences

In the Skywalk litigation, Wright used in-camera review to test privilege claims while protecting core attorney strategy materials.

“The Court, therefore, must make an in camera inspection of those documents that relate to the three categories listed and to which a claim of privilege has been asserted.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Thomas v. Sullivan
· 1991-08-19
Motion to alter or amend judgment (defendant Secretary) Denied

“ORDERED that defendant’s motion to alter and amend is denied.”

T.L.J. v. Ashcroft
· 1983-11-04
Motion for temporary restraining order (plaintiff) Granted

“ORDERED that defendants, their agents, employees, appointees and successors are enjoined and restrained from applying, implementing, relying upon or enforcing or threatening to apply, to implement, to rely upon or to enforce Missouri Revised Statutes, § 188.028”

Hisle v. Missouri Local Government Employees' Retirement System
· 1991-08-07
Summary judgment (plaintiffs) Denied

“ORDERED that plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment is denied.”

Summary judgment (defendant LAGERS) Granted

“ORDERED that defendant Missouri Local Government Employees’ Retirement System’s (LAGERS) motion for summary judgment is granted.”

Motion for voluntary dismissal (plaintiffs) Granted

“ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion to dismiss Counts Two and Three is granted.”

Missouri Health Care Ass'n v. Stangler
· 1991-06-12
Summary judgment (defendants) Denied

“ORDERED that defendants’ motion for summary judgment is denied.”

Summary judgment (plaintiffs) Granted in part

“ORDERED that plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment is granted in part and denied in part.”

Robinson v. Smith
· 1984-04-23
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“ORDERED that defendant’s motion to dismiss is granted.”

In re Federal Skywalk Cases
· 1983-05-04

Wright allocated an interim class-counsel fee award and requested additional briefing about supplemental compensation funds; the court-managed award is retained for context but excluded from motion statistics.

Brookins v. State of Missouri Board of Probation & Parole
· 1984-04-10
Motions to dismiss (defendants) Granted

“ORDERED that defendants’ motion to dismiss is granted.”

Vineyard v. Massey
· 1984-01-05
Summary judgment (defendants) Granted

“ORDERED that defendants’ motion for summary judgment is granted.”

Sparks v. Mo-Kan Iron Workers Pension Fund
· 1990-12-28
Motions to dismiss (defendant Delores Cole) Denied

“ORDERED that Delores Cole’s motion to dismiss the complaint against her is denied.”

Redford v. R.A.F. Corp.
· 1985-08-19
Summary judgment (third-party defendant Cargill) Granted

“ORDERED that third-party defendant Cargill’s motion for summary judgment on third-party plaintiff R.A.F. Corporation’s third-party complaint is granted.”

Motions to compel (plaintiff) Moot / procedural

“ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion to compel third-party defendant Cargill to answer interrogatories is denied as moot.”

Walker v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole
· 1984-04-16
Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (plaintiff) Granted

“ORDERED that plaintiff is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a).”

Tomich v. Missouri Board of Probation and Parole
· 1984-04-05
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“ORDERED that defendant’s motion for summary judgment is granted.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Median case duration in the sampled dockets: 1890 days (N = 20).

The 20 oldest returned assigned matters were predominantly prisoner civil-rights cases, with additional civil-rights, habeas, commerce, ERISA, fraud, and employment matters.

A historical record

Judge Wright no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.