Megan Blair Benton

How Judge Benton rules, drawn from 10 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Position
District judge
Appointed by
Donald Trump (Republican)
Commissioned
February 10, 2026
ABA rating
Qualified
Education
B.A., Emory University, 2007; M.A., Emory University; J.D., Vanderbilt University Law School, 2010
Signed orders read
10

About Judge Benton

Megan Blair Benton is a judge of the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri. Appointed by President Donald J. Trump, Judge Benton received a commission on February 10, 2026.

Judge Benton's practices and standing orders

Rules for cases before Judge Benton, as published on the court's website (checked October 9, 2026). Judges revise these often, so confirm the current version on the court's site before you file.

Key rules

Trial

File motions in limine at least ten days before the pretrial conference and responses at least three days before it.

“Motions in limine shall be filed at least 10 days before the pretrial conference. Any responses shall be filed at least 3 days before the pretrial conference”

Standing orders for every case in this court

Orders the court applies to all of its cases, whichever judge has them, as published on the court's website (checked October 9, 2026).

Key rules from these orders · The court's local rules ↗

How Judge Benton decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Procedural preferences

In Welch, she denied two postjudgment motions after concluding that Rule 60(b) could not reopen a case simply to relitigate its merits after appellate affirmance.

“cannot reargue the merits of her case on a Rule 60(b) motion.”

In Alavidze, she denied emergency relief against removal or transfer after finding neither likely success on the habeas claim nor a supported risk of imminent harm.

“Because Petitioner has not shown a likelihood of success on the merits or irreparable harm,”

Cautions

In United States v. Mitchell, she denied a criminal defendant’s motion to suppress after de novo review of the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation.

“It is further ORDERED that Defendant's motion to suppress evidence (Doc. 18) is DENIED for the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

United States v. Gary Mitchell, Jr.
6:25-cr-03045-MBB · 2026-04-03
Motion to suppress (defendant) Denied

“It is further ORDERED that Defendant's motion to suppress evidence (Doc. 18) is DENIED for the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation.”

United States v. David William Platek
6:25-cr-03076-MBB · 2026-04-03
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“It is further ORDERED that Defendant’s motion to dismiss (Doc. 65) is DENIED for the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation.”

Karimzhanov v. Mullin
6:26-cv-03318-MBB · 2026-06-10
Motion for preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order (petitioner) Denied

“The Court DENIES Petitioner’s Emergency Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order and a Preliminary Injunction.”

Karimzhanov v. Mullin
6:26-cv-03318-MBB · 2026-06-29
Petition for writ of habeas corpus (petitioner) Denied

“The Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED. Petitioner has not demonstrated he is entitled to the relief sought.”

United States v. Branscum
6:25-cr-03158-MBB · 2026-07-20
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“Defendant’s motion to dismiss (Doc. 52) is DENIED for the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation.”

United States v. Branscum
6:25-cr-03158-MBB · 2026-08-14
Motion to suppress (defendant) Denied

“Defendant’s motion to suppress evidence (Doc. 53) is DENIED for the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation.”

Aguilar-Vasquez v. Russell Cellular, Inc.
6:26-cv-03218-MBB · 2026-05-13
Motion to consolidate and appoint interim counsel (plaintiff) Granted

“Because consolidation and appointment of interim co-lead and liaison counsel will promote efficiency and will not prejudice any party, the Motion is GRANTED.”

Motion for extension of time (defendant) Moot / procedural

“ORDERED that Defendant Verizon Communications, Inc.’s motions for extension of time to file an answer in Case No. 6:26-cv-03218-MBB (Doc. 10), Case No. 6:26-cv-03219-MBB (Doc. 14), and Case No. 6:26-cv-03224-MBB (Doc. 5) are DENIED as MOOT.”

Welch v. City of Carthage
3:26-cv-05034 · 2026-08-07
Motion for reconsideration (Mitsy Lynn Welch (plaintiff)) Denied

“The Court DENIES both motions. (Docs. 191, 201).”

Motion for postjudgment relief (Mitsy Lynn Welch (plaintiff)) Denied
Sun v. Mullin
6:26-cv-03226 · 2026-04-29
Habeas petition (Baile Sun (petitioner)) Denied

“The Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED.”

Alavidze v. Arnott
6:26-cv-03286 · 2026-05-18
Motion for tro (Tornike Alavidze (petitioner)) Denied

“The Motion for a TRO and a Preliminary Injunction is DENIED.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Median case duration in the sampled dockets: 22 days (N = 15).

Median motion-to-ruling time: 18 days (N = 26).

Because Benton joined the court in February 2026, most of her cases remain pending. The sampled docket is dominated by alien-detainee habeas petitions, with a growing mix of civil-rights, contract, diversity, prisoner, and criminal matters.

Pending matters in the official report

Reported by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts under the Civil Justice Reform Act, as of March 31, 2026.

Motions pending more than six months0
Bench trials submitted more than six months0
Bankruptcy appeals pending more than six months0
Social Security appeals pending more than six months0
Civil cases pending more than three years0

A snapshot on that date: matters listed may since have been decided or reassigned. A motion referred to a magistrate judge is counted for both judges. Motions in multidistrict litigation, section 2255 cases and Social Security appeals are not counted, and a very large three-year count is generally a multidistrict docket. Source: Appendix A of the report (PDF); about the report.

How long civil cases take in this court

For the whole of United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri, not for Judge Benton: median time from filing to disposition of the civil cases the court closed in the 12 months ending September 30, 2025, as reported by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts.

CasesMedian time
All civil cases closed1,4296.7 months
Closed with no court action5205.7 months
Closed before pretrial8767.2 months
Closed during or after pretrial1949.3 months
Closed during trial1422.7 months
12 months endingCases closedMedian time
Sep 20251,4296.7 months
Sep 20241,4616.9 months
Sep 20231,5026.2 months
Sep 20221,7387.3 months
Sep 20211,3418.2 months
Sep 20201,3126.9 months
Sep 20191,4857 months

The table leaves out prisoner petitions, land condemnations, deportation reviews, recovery of overpayments and enforcement of judgments, and reports no median for fewer than 10 cases. A district that closed a large multidistrict litigation in the period shows very large counts and long medians for that year. Source: Table C-5, U.S. District Courts (spreadsheet).

Draft for Judge Benton with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Benton, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Benton's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace