Dean Whipple

How Judge Whipple rules, drawn from 27 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Position
District judge
Status
Senior status
Appointed by
Ronald Reagan (Republican)
Commissioned
December 9, 1987
Education
Drury College, A.B. (1961); University of Missouri–Kansas City School of Law, J.D. (1965)
Signed orders read
27

About Judge Whipple

Dean Whipple is a judge of the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri. Appointed by President Ronald Reagan, Judge Whipple received a commission on December 9, 1987. Judge Whipple assumed senior status on April 30, 2007.

Standing orders for every case in this court

Orders the court applies to all of its cases, whichever judge has them, as published on the court's website (checked October 9, 2026).

Key rules from these orders · The court's local rules ↗

How Judge Whipple decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

In the Consolidated Freightways case, Whipple denied a discretionary stay after finding that the competing hardship and public-interest arguments did not carry the defendant’s burden.

“On balance, the factors discussed above do not support a stay of this action.”

Procedural preferences

In Devore, Whipple treated fraudulent joinder as an equitable doctrine suited to guide discretion where the ordinary statutory framework did not squarely control.

“the doctrine, being equitable in nature, is well-suited to decide this case where the Court has discretion to remand.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Roe v. Crawford
· 2005-10-14
Preliminary injunction (plaintiff Roe) Granted

“Pursuant to the Court’s Modified Judgment of Preliminary Injunction, Defendants are directed to transport Plaintiff to Reproductive Health Services of Planned Parenthood of St. Louis”

FCC National Bank v. Willis
· 1996-08-07
Bankruptcy appeal (appellant First Card) Denied

“ORDERED that the judgment of the bankruptcy court is affirmed.”

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Consolidated Freightways Corp.
· 2004-07-14
Motions to stay (defendant Consolidated Freightways) Denied

“For the foregoing reasons, the Court denies the defendant’s motion for a discretionary stay”

United States v. Zubeck
· 2002-10-25
Motion to revoke supervised release (United States) Granted

“the Court orally granted the United States’ motion to revoke Defendant’s supervised release”

Gustin v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.
· 1993-12-08
Motion for additional summary judgment ground (Boatmen’s Bank) Denied

“Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Boatmen’s motion is DENIED.”

Checkett v. Vickers (In re Vickers)
· 1990-12-05
Bankruptcy appeal (trustee) Denied

“the court affirms the bankruptcy court’s order.”

Pruett v. Goldline Laboratories, Inc.
· 1990-11-20
Motions to dismiss (defendant Goldline Laboratories) Denied

“ORDERED that Defendant Goldline Laboratories, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss, filed September 25, 1990 is denied.”

Motion for leave to amend (plaintiffs) Granted

“ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint, filed October 17, 1990 is granted.”

Parent v. Halter
· 2001-05-18
Social security appeal (plaintiff Parent) Denied

“AFFIRMS the decision by the Commissioner to deny Plaintiffs applications for disability insurance benefits under Title II and supplemental security income under Title XVI.”

United States v. Veal
· 2004-08-24
Motion for new trial (defendants) Denied

“the Court denies Defendants’ motion for new trial, or in the alternative, motion for relief from judgment, or in the alternative, motion for remittitur or reduction in judgment.”

Motion for relief from judgment (defendants) Denied
Motion for remittitur (defendants) Denied
Gay & Lesbian Services Network, Inc. v. Bishop
· 1993-11-04
Motion to amend judgment (plaintiffs) Granted in part

“ORDERED that the Court’s September 13, 1993 Order is MODIFIED, nunc pro tunc, by the present Order.”

Brackett v. State Highways & Transportation Commission
· 1995-08-29
Notice of voluntary dismissal (plaintiff) Granted

“ORDERED that Count II of Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint be dismissed against Defendant Todey without prejudice.”

Motion to dismiss with prejudice (defendant Todey) Denied

“The Court finally DENIES Defendant Todey’s motion to dismiss Count II against him with prejudice”

Motions to dismiss (defendant Todey) Moot / procedural

“DENIES Defendant Todey’s remaining motions to dismiss as moot.”

Federal Trade Commission v. Freeman Hospital
· 1995-05-08
Motions to dismiss (defendant hospitals) Denied

“It is therefore ORDERED that Defendants’ motion to dismiss the FTC’s amended complaint for failure to state a claim is DENIED.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Median case duration in the sampled dockets: 772 days (N = 20).

The 20 oldest returned assigned matters were all terminated and included product-liability, contract, prisoner, benefits, ERISA, property, tax, and personal-injury cases.

How long civil cases take in this court

For the whole of United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri, not for Judge Whipple: median time from filing to disposition of the civil cases the court closed in the 12 months ending September 30, 2025, as reported by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts.

CasesMedian time
All civil cases closed1,4296.7 months
Closed with no court action5205.7 months
Closed before pretrial8767.2 months
Closed during or after pretrial1949.3 months
Closed during trial1422.7 months
12 months endingCases closedMedian time
Sep 20251,4296.7 months
Sep 20241,4616.9 months
Sep 20231,5026.2 months
Sep 20221,7387.3 months
Sep 20211,3418.2 months
Sep 20201,3126.9 months
Sep 20191,4857 months

The table leaves out prisoner petitions, land condemnations, deportation reviews, recovery of overpayments and enforcement of judgments, and reports no median for fewer than 10 cases. A district that closed a large multidistrict litigation in the period shows very large counts and long medians for that year. Source: Table C-5, U.S. District Courts (spreadsheet).

Draft for Judge Whipple with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Whipple, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Whipple's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace