Albert L. Reeves

How Judge Reeves rules, drawn from 25 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Reeves no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Position
district
Status
Deceased
Served
1923–1971
Appointed by
Warren G. Harding (Republican)
Commissioned
1923-06-24
Education
Steelville College, A.B. (1898); Read law (1899)
Signed orders read
25

How Judge Reeves decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

In Triangle Publications, Reeves protected an expanding business when a local competitor adopted its established magazine name with advance knowledge of the expansion.

“the defendant, for the first time, issued a magazine clearly imitative of the name and mark used by the plaintiff on the cover of its magazines.”

Procedural preferences

In White, Reeves confined document production to material relevant to the claims and defenses in the pending action.

“These are' not relevant to the subject matter of. the pending action”

Cautions

In Reed, Reeves required a plaintiff with access to the product information to plead the specific harmful substance rather than rely on conclusions.

“The pleader’s conclusions of law or fact, unsupported by the basic facts, will not do; and such basic facts must be alleged, not left to inference.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Triangle Publications, Inc. v. Central Pub. Co.
· 1954-01-26
Application for temporary injunction (plaintiff) Granted

“It follows that the plaintiff is entitled to a temporary injunction, and counsel' for plaintiff will prepare and submit an appropriate decree.”

Bowles v. Economy Utilities Co.
· 1946-01-19
Motion for production (plaintiff) Granted

“Such records would be competent evidence in the trial of the case and under said rule the plaintiff is entitled to have them produced. An order will be made accordingly.”

Cass v. Pacific Fire Ins.
· 1947-06-04

Reeves scheduled a hearing to determine whether and on what conditions the plaintiff could voluntarily dismiss; no final dismissal outcome appears in this text.

Case v. Missouri Public Service Corp.
· 1948-06-08
Motion for bill of particulars (defendant) Denied

“it is proper for the court to overrule said motion, and leave the defendants to their remedy under the several discovery rules above mentioned.”

Brush v. Harkins
· 1950-01-25
Motion to quash subpoena (plaintiffs’ attorney) Granted

“The motion to quash the subpoena should be and will be sustained.”

United States v. Harris
· 1947-06-12
Motion to correct sentence (petitioner) Denied

“The ‘motion for correction of sentence’ should be and will be overruled.”

United States v. Morrison
· 1947-06-14
Restitution and damages claim (United States) Granted in part

“This will be equivalent to double instead of treble damages and judgment will be entered accordingly on the second count.”

Injunction claim (United States) Moot / procedural

“The first count of the complaint should be dismissed for the reason that the statute and regulations with respect to prices of used automobiles have been repealed and the defendant should not be enjoined from violating a law that no' longer exists.”

Seth Rhodes Co. v. Southwest Textiles, Inc.
· 1947-06-04
Motions to dismiss (defendants) Denied

“The motion to dismiss on the grounds stated should be overruled and it will be so ordered.”

Holloway v. Skelly Oil Co.
· 1947-09-18
Motion for new trial (defendant) Denied

“It seems proper, therefore, to overrule defendant’s motion for new trial and same will be done.”

Breusing v. Fisher Body Division
· 1947-10-29

Reeves allowed thirty days to add contract-or-custom allegations before deciding a portal-to-portal dismissal request; the conditional ruling is not classified as a final outcome.

Brown v. Pescor
· 1947-11-08
Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (petitioner) Granted

“His affidavit being sufficient, an order will be made granting hint this privilege.”

Habeas petition (petitioner) Denied

“In view of these, the writ of habeas corpus should not be issued.”

Barber v. Dunlop Tire & Rubber Corp.
· 1947-10-31
Motions to remand (plaintiff) Granted

“the motion to remand should be sustained and it will be so ordered.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

No assigned docket records were returned under three plausible Reeves name variants.

A historical record

Judge Reeves no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.