Karen M. See

How Judge See rules, drawn from 22 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge See no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Missouri
Position
bankruptcy
Status
No longer serving
Signed orders read
22

How Judge See decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

A failure to repay a contractual debt did not establish fraud without additional evidence of a false representation or deceptive conduct.

“Mere failure to pay a promissory note is a breach of contract.”

Procedural preferences

Technical default did not entitle a creditor to judgment when the complaint and record left material elements unresolved.

“Plaintiff is not entitled to a default judgment as a matter of right.”

Cautions

Commercial livestock did not qualify for household-use or tools-of-the-trade treatment merely because the debtors operated a dairy farm.

“There is no exemption for animals held for commercial or production purposes.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

In re Richardson Service Corp.
· 1997-05-16
Request for payment of quarterly fees (United States Trustee) Granted

“shall pay to the U.S. Trustee, within 10 days of the date of this Order, the amount due pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1930(a)(6)”

In re Myer
· 1996-06-04
Objection to proof of claim (Debtors) Granted

“Accordingly, it is ordered that Debtors’ Objection to Claim of Sammy Burks is SUSTAINED.”

Steuber v. United States Department of Education, Division of Fiscal Services (In re Steuber)
· 1996-09-06
Complaint to discharge health education loans (Virgil Russell Steuber) Denied

“On PlaintiffDebtor Virgil Russell Steuber’s complaint, judgment is entered against Debtor and for Defendants United States of America, Division of Fiscal Services, Health Resources and Services Administration and the Department of Education.”

Counterclaim to determine nondischargeability (United States) Granted

“On Defendants’ counterclaim, judgment is entered for Defendants and against Debtor.”

Johnson v. Rappleye (In re Rappleye)
· 1997-05-28
Complaint to determine nondischargeability (Marilyn Johnson) Granted

“Judgment is granted in favor of Plaintiff Marilyn Johnson and against Defendant-Debtor George Bryce Rappleye in the amount of $216,011.47”

Burmeister v. Wilcox (In re Wilcox)
· 1996-04-09
Complaint to determine nondischargeability (Sandra Wilcox Thuston, Roy Dean Thuston, and Steve D. Burmeister) Granted

“The debts owed by defendant Billy Gene Wilcox to Sandra Wilcox Thuston, Roy Dean Thuston, and Steve D. Burmeister are excepted from discharge in bankruptcy pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A) and (a)(6)”

In re Goertz
· 1996-10-22
Objection to exemption (Chapter 7 Trustee) Granted

“the Trustee’s Objection to Exemption is sustained as to the $1,370.00 portion of Debt- or’s 1995 tax refund”

Shubert v. Jeter (In re Jeter)
· 1994-09-14
Motion for substantive consolidation (Chapter 7 Trustee) Granted in part

“the trustee’s motion for substantive consolidation of debtors’ estate with Tri-Lakes Builders, Inc., based on commingling of assets and alter ego theories, is granted in part;”

Objection to discharge (Doran Shubert) Granted

“plaintiffs objection to discharge is sustained and debtors’ discharge is revoked;”

Complaint to recover fraudulent transfers and impose constructive trust (Doran Shubert) Denied

“judgment is entered against plaintiff on his complaint to recover pre-bankruptcy fraudulent transfers and impose a constructive trust on the estate.”

White v. Grisham (In re Grisham)
· 1995-01-19
Default judgment (Laura White) Denied

“Plaintiffs Motion for Default Judgment is denied.”

Complaint to determine nondischargeability (Laura White) Denied

“Judgment is entered in favor of Debtor Kathy Ann Grisham and against Plaintiff Laura White, and the debt owed by debtor Kathy Ann Grisham is discharged.”

Haines v. Regina C. Dixon Trust (In re Haines)
· 1995-02-28
Summary judgment (Roger Clinton Haines) Denied

“The motion of plaintiff and debtor in possession Roger Clinton Haines for summary judgment is denied and the cross-motion of defendant and creditor the Regina C. Dixon Trust is granted.”

Cross motion for summary judgment (Regina C. Dixon Trust) Granted
Motion for relief from stay (Regina C. Dixon Trust) Granted

“The automatic stay is terminated so defendants may enforce the state court judgment for possession of the premises.”

In re David Green Property Management
· 1994-02-17
Application for approval of final distribution (Chapter 11 Trustee) Granted

“The Trustee’s Application for Approval of Final Distribution to Unsecured Creditors is approved”

In re Knight Jewelry
· 1994-05-24
Motion for relief from stay (Metro North Company) Granted

“Metro North Company’s Motion to Terminate Automatic Stay is granted”

Motion to convert to chapter 7 (Metro North Company) Granted

“At the end of the hearing, the court granted Metro’s motions to terminate the stay and convert the case to Chapter 7”

In re Cole
· 1994-09-21
Motion for reconsideration (Internal Revenue Service) Granted

“The IRS’ Motion for Reconsideration is granted;”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

No case-duration estimate is reported because exact-name searches returned no public docket records from this tenure.

A historical record

Judge See no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.