Zachary M. Bluestone

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri Appointed by Donald Trump (Republican) 5 signed orders read

How Judge Bluestone decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

On removal/remand, will remand once a plaintiff files an affidavit credibly capping recovery (including statutory attorney's fees) below the $75,000 diversity threshold; the operative-statute language on who collects fees matters, and a binding stipulation is enforced via the duty of candor rather than requiring magic words about binding counsel.

“the Court finds that the revised affidavit ensures that the amount in controversy does not exceed $75,000, thereby requiring a remand for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.”

Procedural preferences

Reads Rule 15(a) strictly in multi-defendant cases: the 21-day amendment-as-of-right window runs from the earliest defensive action, and an amended complaint filed without leave or consent will be STRUCK sua sponte rather than accepted. Move for leave under Rule 15(a)(2) and Local Rule 4.07.

“the Court must strike the amended pleading as improper because Plaintiffs had neither leave nor consent.”

For related cases sharing common questions, follows Local Rule 4.03: the judge on the lowest-numbered case rules on consolidation and presides over the consolidated matter. Expect consolidation 'for all purposes' where common fact/law questions risk inconsistent adjudications.

“In this Court, the judge presiding over the lowest-numbered case is responsible for ruling on such requests and, if the motion is granted, presiding over the consolidated cases. See E.D. MO. L.R. 4.03.”

Cautions

Will impose monetary sanctions and compel compliance for discovery gamesmanship: piecemeal/non-responsive Rule 26(a) disclosures and a no-show at a properly noticed deposition drew a $1,775 sanction and an order to appear, with more sanctions reserved. Meet discovery obligations and appear when noticed.

“the Court grants the motion to compel Henreid to appear for a deposition and sanctions Henreid $1,775 for his failure to appear at his original deposition.”

Enforces basic threshold requirements: suing admittedly improper defendants and failing to effect proper service will get the case dismissed (without prejudice) without reaching the merits. Name the correct defendant and perfect service.

“Because Plaintiff Reva Caldwell sued several improper defendants by her own admission and otherwise failed to effect service, the Court dismisses this action without prejudice.”

Motion outcomes

Counted from classified signed orders only. Percentages are shown only where the sample is large enough to be meaningful; smaller samples are reported as raw counts.

Motion for extension of time
N = 2
Moot / procedural: 2 counts only
Motions to remand
N = 1
Granted: 1 counts only
Motions to dismiss
N = 1
Granted: 1 counts only
Motion to consolidate
N = 1
Granted in part: 1 counts only
Motion to appoint counsel
N = 1
Granted: 1 counts only
Motions to compel
N = 1
Granted in part: 1 counts only
Motion to deny pending motions to dismiss
N = 1
Moot / procedural: 1 counts only

A "1 of 1" is one ruling, not a tendency. Treat small samples as illustrative, not predictive.

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Lisa Longo v. CCM Partners, LP (d/b/a Shelton Capital Management)
4:25-CV-669-ZMB · 2025-10-22
Motions to remand (plaintiff) Granted

“Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Longo’s [21] second motion to remand, DENIES as moot Longo’s [25] motion to extend time to file a response to the motion to compel arbitration, and DENIES without prejudice CCM Partners’s [27] motion to extend time to file a reply to the motion to compel arbitration.”

Motion for extension of time (plaintiff) Moot / procedural

“DENIES as moot Longo’s [25] motion to extend time to file a response to the motion to compel arbitration”

Motion for extension of time (defendant) Moot / procedural

“DENIES without prejudice CCM Partners’s [27] motion to extend time to file a reply to the motion to compel arbitration”

Reva Caldwell v. David Steiner (Postmaster General) et al.
4:24-CV-1023-ZMB · 2026-03-02
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“Because Plaintiff Reva Caldwell sued several improper defendants by her own admission and otherwise failed to effect service, the Court dismisses this action without prejudice.”

Patrick O’Donnell et al. v. Charter Communications, Inc. et al.
4:25-CV-157-ZMB · 2025-11-21
Motion to consolidate (defendant) Granted in part

“the Court grants the Motion to Consolidate Cases in part and grants the motions to appoint counsel as orally modified.”

Motion to appoint counsel (plaintiff) Granted

“the Court grants the Motion to Consolidate Cases in part and grants the motions to appoint counsel as orally modified.”

Paul Henreid v. Kodner Watkins LC et al.
4:23-CV-249-ZMB · 2026-03-12
Motions to compel (defendant) Granted in part

“the Court grants the motion to compel Henreid to appear for a deposition and sanctions Henreid $1,775 for his failure to appear at his original deposition. The Court will consider the remaining discovery disputes and all other sanction issues at the status hearing on March 17, 2026.”

Estate of Lamoree’ Moore v. Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, Inc. et al.
4:25-CV-936-ZMB · 2025-09-08
Motion to deny pending motions to dismiss (plaintiff) Moot / procedural

“Additionally, the Court DENIES as moot Plaintiffs’ [67] Motion to Deny Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Median motion-to-ruling time: 268 days (N = 5).

Not systematically enumerated. The 3 analyzed dockets span an employment-discrimination case removed then remanded (Longo), a federal-sector Title VII suit against the Postmaster General (Caldwell), and a consolidated ERISA 401(k) class action (O'Donnell). Bluestone's broader docket (from observed cases) includes ERISA, employment, and personal-injury matters.