David P. McDonald

How Judge McDonald rules, drawn from 37 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge McDonald no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Position
bankruptcy
Status
No longer serving
Signed orders read
37

How Judge McDonald decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

Exemption claims required a valid Missouri-law basis connecting the claimed asset to the asserted exemption.

“Debtor has failed to point to any Missouri statute or common law principle that would exempt her interest in the Bank Account from attachment or execution.”

Summary judgment depended on whether the movant eliminated a material factual dispute on the governing defense.

“UHC has failed to demonstrate in its motion and supporting affidavit that there are no material facts in dispute so that it is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”

Procedural preferences

A mandatory filing defect required dismissal when the record did not support the statutory good-faith exception.

“The Court, therefore, has no discretion under § 521(i)(l) but to dismiss Debtor’s case effective on the 46th day after he filed his petition for relief, which is March 28, 2006.”

A creditor seeking nondischargeability needed a reasonable factual and legal investigation before filing.

“The creditor, therefore, must make a reasonable investigation of the facts and law supporting its claim before filing the adversary complaint.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

In re Lamb
· 1997-03-14
Motion to appoint counsel (George Daniel Lamb) Denied

“ORDERED that debtor’s request for appointment of counsel IS DENIED.”

In re Munster
· 1998-06-12
Objection to plan confirmation (Chapter 13 Trustee) Granted

“Trustee’s Objection to Confirmation IS SUSTAINED”

In re Tumminello
· 2001-10-15
Objection to claim (Sharon Ann Tumminello) Denied

“Sharon’s objection to James’ claim is overruled.”

Motions to dismiss (James Tumminello) Granted

“James’ motion to dismiss will be granted; provided however, that the dismissal shall be set aside if Sharon files an amended plan within fifteen days that provides for the payment of James’ allowed secured claim.”

In re Tyczka
· 2002-04-15
Objections to compensation application (Jo Tyczka and Ellen Anderson) Granted

“The court will sustain the objections.”

Application for compensation (Chapter 7 Trustee) Granted in part

“The Court accepts Trustee’s amended request of $7,503.85 as reasonable”

In re Snyder
· 2002-05-31
Omnibus post judgment motion (Eric James Snyder) Denied

“Based upon a review of the record the Court will deny Snyder’s motion in its entirety.”

Scott v. Midwestern Training Center, Inc. (In re Scott)
· 2002-05-31

After trial, the court held that a truck-driving-school loan funded by a for-profit business was dischargeable; the trial counterclaim is retained outside motion statistics.

In re White
· 2002-06-07
Motion to amend exemptions (Charles and Michele Ireland) Denied

“the doctrine of res judicata bars Debtors from now asserting that a portion of the Tax Refund is exempt under Missouri law.”

Objection to exemption (Chapter 7 Trustee Fredrich Cruse) Granted

“Trustee’s objection to White’s homestead exemption will be sustained.”

Nolfo v. Nolfo (In re Nolfo)
· 2002-07-24
Motion for sanctions (Linda Nolfo and Aaron Dubin) Denied

“the Court will deny Linda Nolfo and Aaron Dubin’s motion for sanctions against Debtor and Lee Elliott.”

In re Visionaire Corp.
· 2003-03-21
Motion to amend financing order (Chapter 7 Trustee) Granted

“the Court will grant Trustee’s motion to amend and clarify the Financing Order under Rule 60(b)(6).”

Peltz v. Denver Post Corp. (In re Bridge Information Systems, Inc.)
· 2003-09-04
Summary judgment (The Denver Post Corporation) Granted

“Transferee is entitled to judgment as a matter of law on its ordinary course of business defense under § 547(c)(2).”

Peltz v. United Health Care (In re Bridge Information Systems, Inc.)
· 2003-10-02
Summary judgment (United Health Care) Denied

“Accordingly, the Court will deny its Motion for Summary Judgment.”

In re Huntco Inc.
· 2003-11-15
Motion for substantive consolidation (Official Unsecured Creditors’ Committee) Denied

“Thus, the Court will deny its motion.”

A historical record

Judge McDonald no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.