William Lochren

How Judge Lochren rules, drawn from 35 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Lochren no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
United States District Court for the District of Minnesota
Position
district
Status
Deceased
Served
1896–1912
Appointed by
Grover Cleveland (Democratic)
Commissioned
1896-05-18
Education
Read law (1856)
Signed orders read
35

How Judge Lochren decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Cautions

He denied preliminary relief when infringement depended on a close mechanical-equivalence question better resolved on a fuller record.

“I am inclined to think that that matter is a subject of sufficient doubt, so. that it should be left until a fuller hearing.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Anoka Water Works, Electric Light & Power Co. v. City of Anoka
· 1901-06-03
Equitable relief (municipal utility and bond trustee) Granted

“Decree will be entered adjudging that the contracts between the city of Anoka and the complainant the Anoka Waterworks, Electric Light & Power Company for furnishing water and light to said city, which are set forth in the bill of complaint, are valid and existing contracts;”

Strand v. Griffith
· 1901-06-19
Motion for new trial (defendants) Granted

“Ordered, that the verdict and judgment be vacated and set aside, and a new trial granted as to all the defendants.”

Humbird v. Avery
· 1901-08-29
Bill in equity (land claimants) Denied

“Decree will be entered dismissing the bill, with costs.”

In re Soldosky
· 1901-10-31
Bankruptcy review (trustee challenging the referee's allowance) Denied

“The ruling of the referee is affirmed.”

In re Brundin
· 1901-12-14
Attorney fee application (bankrupts' attorney) Granted in part

“It is ordered that the allowance of the claim of the bankrupts’ attorney be reduced to the sum of $271.10.”

Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co. v. Koehler & Hinrichs
· 1902-02-25
Preliminary injunction (patent holder) Denied

“I am inclined to think that the motion should be denied. Ordered accordingly.”

Fairbanks, Morse & Co. v. C. A. Stickney & Co.
· 1902-02-26
Bill in equity (patent holder) Denied

“For these reasons, I think the decree must be for the defendant in this case, dismissing the bill. Ordered accordingly.”

Boardman v. S. S. McClure Co.
· 1903-06-20
Motion to quash service (defendant publisher) Granted

“I think I shall have to grant the motion.”

Knudsen v. Benn
· 1903-06-22
Preliminary injunction (freight-handling employers) Granted

“It seems to me that this injunction must be allowed”

Minnesota v. Northern Securities Co.
· 1903-08-01
Bill in equity (State of Minnesota) Denied

“Decree will be entered dismissing the bill.”

Gilbert v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.
· 1903-07-01
Motion for directed verdict (defendant railroad) Granted

“I do not see that anything is left for me but to grant this motion and direct a verdict for the defendant.”

Dowagiac Mfg. Co. v. Minnesota Moline Plow Co.
· 1903-08-04
Contempt application (patent holder) Denied

“I think this proceeding must be dismissed.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

No assigned electronic dockets were found for Lochren's 1896–1908 tenure, so the record does not support a caseload distribution or timing analysis.

A historical record

Judge Lochren no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.