Paul Arthur Magnuson
How Judge Magnuson rules, drawn from 16 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.
How Judge Magnuson decides
Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.
What persuades
On summary judgment, will not resolve competing factual accounts on a paper record — credibility disputes go to the jury. A movant who asks the court to simply credit its own version of disputed events will lose.
“It will be for the jury to determine whether Plaintiffs or ARS’s employees are telling the truth about what transpired.”
Where a negligence claim turns on a professional's exercise of judgment (here, school administrators), Magnuson requires expert testimony on the standard of care; failure to disclose such an expert is dispositive.
“Plaintiff’s failure to identify an expert to define the duty of care Defendants owed her in the exercise of their professional judgment as school administrators is fatal to her negligence claims”
Procedural preferences
Insists litigants use the proper procedural vehicle: you cannot dismiss a defendant via a footnote, nor amend a complaint by adding theories in a brief. Relief must be sought by motion or stipulation.
“But a footnote in an opposition brief is not the appropriate way to accomplish the dismissal of a Defendant. It is Plaintiffs’ responsibility to file a motion or stipulation so the Court’s record can reflect the realities of the case.”
Cautions
A high bar for Rule 11 sanctions: even when granting a motion to dismiss a claim he considers meritless, he declines sanctions absent intentional or reckless disregard of counsel's duties. Moving for sanctions alongside a strong MTD is unlikely to add value before him.
“While the Court believes that the FDCPA claim against Smith Jadin Johnson is without merit, there is no indication that Plaintiff’s counsel intentionally or recklessly disregarded any duties to the court. ... Rule 11 sanctions are not warranted.”
Signed rulings
A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.
“Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 32) is GRANTED as to dismissal”
“Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment, Discovery, and Scheduling of a Court Proceeding to Determine Damages (Docket No. 43) is DENIED”
“Defendants’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Docket No. 57) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part”
“IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss or for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 48) is DENIED.”
“Defendant Smith Jadin Johnson, PLLC’s Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 22) is GRANTED”
“Defendant’s Motion for Sanctions (Docket No. 42) is DENIED.”
“The Government's Motions to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction (Henny Docket No. 33; Stamps Docket No. 18) are GRANTED”
“Plaintiff Alessandra Katie Stamps' Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 31) is DENIED as moot”
“the Court denies the request for authorization and orders that this proceeding be closed”
Preservice screening of a pro se prisoner civil-rights complaint; adopted the magistrate judge's R&R and dismissed the lead plaintiff's claims without prejudice as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. section 1915(e)(2), with the co-plaintiffs' claims dismissed for lack of standing.
“Defendant the Minnesota Orchestral Association’s Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 57) is GRANTED and this matter is DISMISSED with prejudice.”
“The Petition (Docket No. 1) and Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Docket No. 4) are DENIED as moot because the Court lacks jurisdiction over this matter”
“The Government’s Motion for a Preliminary Order of Forfeiture (Docket No. 56) is GRANTED”
“Light’s Motion for appointment of counsel, resentencing, and immediate release (Docket Nos. 172, 173, 174.) is DENIED without prejudice.”
“Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 27) is GRANTED; and 2. This matter is DISMISSED without prejudice.”
Caseload & timing
From public federal docket records for this judge.
Median motion-to-ruling time: 39 days (N = 2).
From the docket records. Recent assignments (2026) are overwhelmingly '463 Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee' petitions plus criminal cases; older terminated cases include FDCPA/consumer-credit, civil-rights employment, and Target-litigation civil suits. Senior judge still carrying an active and varied caseload.
Draft for Judge Magnuson with the record in hand
Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Magnuson, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Grounded in Judge Magnuson's own signed orders
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace