Joseph West Molyneaux

How Judge Molyneaux rules, drawn from 25 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Molyneaux no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
United States District Court for the District of Minnesota
Position
district
Status
Deceased
Served
1925–1940
Appointed by
Calvin Coolidge
Commissioned
1925-03-18
Education
Cincinnati Law School (LL.B., 1882)
Signed orders read
25

How Judge Molyneaux decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Cautions

He applied claim preclusion to prevent repeated farmer-debtor proceedings from indefinitely suspending creditor enforcement.

“The farmer-debtor, by the first proceeding, had his day in court and the controversy between him and his creditors was adjudicated. I think the doctrine of res judicata applies..”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Newell v. Byram
· 1927-03-17
Motions to remand (injured plaintiff) Denied

“It is therefore ordered that the motion to remand be and is hereby denied.”

In Re Holmes
· 1926-06-24
Motion to dismiss bankruptcy proceeding (debtor's guardian) Denied

“It is ordered that the order to show cause be and the same is hereby discharged, and the motion to dismiss these proceedings is hereby denied.”

Milton Dairy Co. v. Willcuts
· 1925-07-31
Tax refund claim (corporate taxpayer) Denied

“My view of this ease is that tho plaintiff’s contention cannot be sustained and that it violates the spirit and letter of section 326, Revenue Act of 1918 (40 Statutes at Large, pp. 1057, 1092, 1093).”

Duggan v. United States
· 1929-12-30
War risk insurance claim (insured veteran) Granted in part

“My conclusion is that the plaintiff is not entitled to recover in this action from the defendant as to the $3,000 which was reinstated and converted, and is entitled as to the $7,000 which was not reinstated.”

In Re Bibbey
· 1925-09-22
Bankruptcy review (finance company) Granted

“The Otas Einance Company, to whom said contract was assigned, is entitled to the possession of said automobile, and the referee’s order is therefore reversed, and this memorandum is made a part of the order filed herewith.”

Pierce v. Desmond
· 1926-03-01
Motions to remand (state-court counterclaimant) Denied

“I therefore hold that the case is removaable, and it is ordered that the motion to re? mand be and the same is hereby denied.”

Red Wing Malting Co. v. Willcuts
· 1925-07-31
Tax refund claim (corporate taxpayer) Denied

“In my opinion the good will is not ‘property used in the trade or business,’ within the meaning of the Revenue Act.”

Thompson v. United States
· 1925-07-31
Tax valuation refund claim (estate administrators) Denied

“I do not think that the court would be justified in holding that the lands in question were overvalued as of May 1, 1919.”

Estate tax deduction claim (estate administrators) Granted

“I have concluded that, notwithstanding the regulation of the Internal Revenue Department, this tax was a legal claim against the estate and should have been deducted.”

Madden Bros. v. Railroad & Warehouse Commission of Minnesota
· 1930-08-09
Motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction (state officials) Granted

“I hold that this court is without jurisdiction of the subject-matter of the suit, and for that reason the motion of the defendant is granted, and it is ordered that this action be dismissed.”

In re Friedman Bros.
· 1927-05-12
Bankruptcy review (state-court receiver) Granted

“The order of the referee is, for the foregoing reasons, reversed.”

North American Creamery Co. v. Willcuts
· 1930-02-21
Tax refund claim (corporate taxpayer) Denied

“My conclusion is that the plaintiff is not entitled to recover.”

King Ventilating Co. v. St. James Ventilating Co.
· 1927-02-23
Patent infringement claim (patent plaintiff) Denied

“Summing up: I hold patent No. 50,624, granted April 17, 1917, to Louie Klima, is now owned by the plaintiff, King Ventilating Company, is invalid, and the bill should be dismissed.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

No assigned electronic dockets were found for Molyneaux's 1925–1940 tenure, so the record does not support a caseload distribution or timing analysis.

A historical record

Judge Molyneaux no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.