Donald Douglas Alsop

How Judge Alsop rules, drawn from 28 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
United States District Court for the District of Minnesota
Position
District judge
Status
Senior status
Appointed by
Richard M. Nixon (Republican)
Commissioned
December 20, 1974
Education
University of Minnesota (B.S.L., 1950); University of Minnesota Law School (LL.B., 1952)
Signed orders read
28

About Judge Alsop

Donald Douglas Alsop is a judge of the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota. Appointed by President Richard M. Nixon, Judge Alsop received a commission on December 20, 1974. Judge Alsop assumed senior status on August 28, 1992.

Judge Alsop's practices and standing orders

The court's website lists no individual practices or standing orders of Judge Alsop's own (checked October 9, 2026), so the court's local rules and general orders are the place to look (court page ↗).

Standing orders for every case in this court

Orders the court applies to all of its cases, whichever judge has them, as published on the court's website (checked October 9, 2026).

Key rules from these orders · The court's local rules ↗

How Judge Alsop decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Cautions

When evaluating waiver of procedural protections, Alsop required meaningful knowledge of available review.

“Consenting to the sale of the farm absent knowledge that the liquidation decision is appealable is hardly a knowing waiver of the procedural protections FmHA has so carefully provided at the acceleration and later stages preceding foreclosure.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Haghighi v. Russian-American Broadcasting Co.
· 1996-11-08

Alsop resolved whether a mediator could testify at a hearing on a disputed settlement, but did not decide the settlement-enforcement motion.

Royalton State Bank v. United States
· 1989-08-21
Motions to dismiss (defendant United States) Granted

“Defendant’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED.”

Burns v. Ersek
· 1984-05-08
Appeal of magistrate order (plaintiff Burns) Denied

“plaintiff’s appeal of that order is hereby denied.”

United States v. Maier
· 1982-01-08
Motion to suppress (criminal defendant Maier) Granted

“the motion of defendant to suppress the physical evidence obtained as a result of search and seizure is granted, and such evidence is suppressed.”

Severtson v. Phillips Beverage Co.
· 1992-01-24
Motions to strike (defendants Phillips Beverage Co. and related parties) Granted

“The affidavit of Timothy W. Zastoupil is STRICKEN;”

Appeal of magistrate order (defendants Phillips Beverage Co. and related parties) Denied

“The orders of United States Magistrate Judge Franklin L. Noel filed December 17, 1991, docket entries 104 and 105, are AFFIRMED in all respects.”

Rhude v. United States
· 1984-08-01
Summary judgment (plaintiffs Rhude) Denied

“plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment be denied.”

Summary judgment (defendant United States) Granted

“defendant’s motion for summary judgment be granted.”

Wagner v. International Harvester Company
· 1978-06-22
Motion for partial summary judgment (defendant International Harvester Company) Granted

“the motion of International Harvester Company for partial summary judgment with respect to the claims of Anne Wagner be and hereby is granted.”

George Ex Rel. George v. Schweiker
· 1982-08-04
Motion for partial summary judgment (plaintiff Angelique George) Granted

“the motion of the plaintiff for summary judgment is granted.”

Livingston v. ITT Consumer Financial Corp.
· 1992-06-04
Dispositive motion (defendants ITT Consumer Financial Corp. and related entities) Granted in part

“For the reasons set forth below, defendants’ motion will be granted in part and denied in part.”

Hill v. Chemical Bank
· 1992-08-04
Motions to remand (plaintiff cardholders) Denied

“plaintiffs’ motions to remand the instant actions are DENIED.”

E. M. Trucks, Inc. v. Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Plan
· 1981-07-06
Motion for leave to amend (plaintiff E. M. Trucks, Inc.) Granted

“plaintiff be and it hereby is granted leave to file an Amended Complaint.”

Summary judgment (plaintiff E. M. Trucks, Inc.) Denied

“the motion of plaintiff for summary judgment be and it hereby is denied.”

Summary judgment (defendant pension plan) Denied

“the motion of defendant for summary judgment be and it hereby is denied.”

Defenders of the Wildlife v. Hodel
· 1989-02-15
Summary judgment (defendant Secretary of the Interior) Denied

“Defendant’s motion for summary judgment is DENIED;”

Summary judgment (plaintiffs Defenders of Wildlife and related groups) Granted

“Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment is GRANTED;”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Median case duration in the sampled dockets: 90 days (N = 10).

Median motion-to-ruling time: 32.5 days (N = 2).

The fixed-seed sample included employment, benefits, product-liability, contract, environmental, negotiable-instrument, and criminal matters. All ten sampled matters were terminated.

How long civil cases take in this court

For the whole of United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, not for Judge Alsop: median time from filing to disposition of the civil cases the court closed in the 12 months ending September 30, 2025, as reported by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts.

CasesMedian time
All civil cases closed2,6818.2 months
Closed with no court action1,4995.6 months
Closed before pretrial6457.4 months
Closed during or after pretrial52513.3 months
Closed during trial1239.4 months
12 months endingCases closedMedian time
Sep 20252,6818.2 months
Sep 20242,6368.3 months
Sep 20232,5797 months
Sep 20222,7015.8 months
Sep 20212,7377.7 months
Sep 20203,25914.3 months
Sep 20198,15121.6 months

The table leaves out prisoner petitions, land condemnations, deportation reviews, recovery of overpayments and enforcement of judgments, and reports no median for fewer than 10 cases. A district that closed a large multidistrict litigation in the period shows very large counts and long medians for that year. Source: Table C-5, U.S. District Courts (spreadsheet).

Draft for Judge Alsop with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Alsop, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Alsop's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace