John J. Connelly

How Judge Connelly rules, drawn from 27 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Connelly no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Minnesota
Position
bankruptcy
Status
Retired 1986
Signed orders read
27

How Judge Connelly decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

A proposed asset sale was approved after the record showed prolonged Chapter 11 stagnation and no necessary infusion of new capital.

“the failure of the debtor to obtain an absolutely necessary injection of new capital fully justifies this court authorizing a sale under § 363”

Procedural preferences

Untimely deadline requests were denied when the applicable bankruptcy rule required action before the original period expired.

“the motion requesting an extension of time to file a complaint to determine dischargeability of a debt is denied.”

The court allowed retroactive compensation for specialized counsel only in limited circumstances supported by fundamental fairness.

“A bankruptcy court may exercise its discretion to retroactively authorize payment of fees where a sense of fundamental fairness warrants it.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

In re K-Tel International, Inc.
· 1986-09-29
Objection to proof of claim (Debtor) Granted in part

“are allowed as one consolidated claim in the amount of $97,000.00 against the remaining Debtor K-tel International, Inc., and the balance, if any, of those claims are disallowed.”

In re Schaak Electronics, Inc.
· 1986-09-16
Application for interim compensation (Lindquist & Vennum) Granted in part

“the application of Patrick Delaney and Thomas Lovett of the Lindquist & Vennum law firm, as special appointed counsel for the above-named debtor, be approved and that Lindquist & Vennum be allowed reasonable attorneys’ fees for services rendered in the above-entitled Chapter 11 proceedings in the sum of $19,500.00”

In re Sikkink
· 1986-04-25
Objection to claim of exemption (Chapter 7 trustee and Farmers and Merchants Bank of Preston) Granted

“the objections of the bank and the trustee to the homestead exemption claimed by debtors be and the same is hereby sustained.”

In re Fossum
· 1986-04-16
Motion to avoid lien (Debtors) Denied

“debtors’ motion to avoid liens insofar as it affects the perfected security interest of John Deere Credit Company in the pieces of farm machinery outlined above be and the same is hereby denied.”

In re Rausch Manufacturing Co.
· 1985-12-31
Objection to asset sale (United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America) Denied

“The objection of the United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (hereinafter ‘UAW’) to the motion to sell assets free and clear of liens and interests is not sustained and the same is hereby dismissed.”

Objection to asset sale (Robert V. Gustafson) Denied

“The objection of Robert V. Gustafson to the motion to sell assets free and clear of liens is not sustained and the same is hereby dismissed.”

Motion to sell assets (Debtor) Granted

“The debtor’s motion to sell all assets of Rausch Manufacturing Company, Inc., the debtor-in-possession, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 363, is hereby granted.”

Motion for expedited consideration (Debtor) Granted

“The motion of the debtor to consider the proposed sale of its assets on an expedited basis is herein granted.”

Motion to convert or dismiss (United States Trustee) Granted

“The United States Trustee’s motion for conversion or dismissal of this case to Chapter 7 originally heard on December 12, 1985 and continued to December 30, 1985 be and the same is hereby granted.”

Motion to withhold sale proceeds (United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America) Denied

“the motion of UAW to withhold disbursing of the proceeds of the sale is denied.”

Motion for stay pending appeal (United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America) Denied

“the motion of the UAW for a stay pending appeal be and the same is hereby denied.”

In re Vance
· 1985-06-21
Objection to plan confirmation (Department of Health and Human Services) Granted

“confirmation of the debtor’s Chapter 13 plan be and the same is hereby denied.”

In re Borchardt
· 1985-04-09
Motion for relief from stay (Farmers State Bank of Sherburn) Granted

“the motion of Farmers State Bank of Sherburn for relief from the automatic stay be granted”

In re Dickenson Lines, Inc.
· 1985-03-06
Motion to discharge tax lien (Debtor) Denied

“the motion of debtor be and the same is hereby denied.”

Middleton v. Farmers State Bank of Fosston
· 1985-01-18

The signed lien-avoidance trial judgment is retained for reasoning but excluded from motion statistics.

In re Babcock
· 1984-11-28
Objection to claim of exemption (Norwest Bank of Mankato, N.A.) Granted

“the debtor’s exemption is denied.”

In re Edward C. Pirsig Farms, Inc.
· 1984-09-04
Motion to determine stay termination (John Deere Company) Denied

“the automatic stay under § 362 remain in full force and effect.”

In re Stoffel
· 1984-08-20
Plan confirmation (Debtors) Denied

“ORDER DENYING CONFIRMATION OF DEBTORS’ PLAN OF REORGANIZATION”

Motion to dismiss or convert (Multiple creditors) Granted

“the above-entitled case be and the same is hereby dismissed.”

A historical record

Judge Connelly no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.