Gregory F. Kishel

How Judge Kishel rules, drawn from 20 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Kishel no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Minnesota
Position
bankruptcy
Status
Retired 2016
Served
1984–2016
Commissioned
1984-01-01
Signed orders read
20

How Judge Kishel decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

For an omitted creditor, the analysis focused on the lost right to file a timely claim and participate in the estate without a separate priority proceeding.

“The right to ‘timely’ file a proof of claim, to stake out a share in the estate without the cost and uncertainty of a judicial proceeding over its priority, is the only right to participate in the bankruptcy process that is cognizable under § 523(a)(3)(A).”

A hypothetical dispute over value did not let debtors displace the trustee's control over estate assets.

“The Debtors have no right to force the issue of control of the equity interests themselves, by raising a hypothetical issue of value.”

Procedural preferences

Subjective fraud issues were reserved for trial when credibility and witness demeanor were central to the disputed facts.

“Fact-finding on these issues often turns on determinations of the credibility of witnesses’ statements as to historical events and parties' subjective states of mind. Such fact-finding is best reserved for a time after in-trial observation of witnesses’ demeanor and their performance under cross-examination.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Croix Oil Co. v. Mai Yer Moua (In re Mai Yer Moua)
· 2011-10-14
Summary judgment (Plaintiff) Granted

“The Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment is granted.”

Kelley v. Hofer (In re Petters Co.)
· 2010-12-20
Motion to transfer to district court (Defendants) Denied

“the motion of Defendants Michael J. Hofer, et al, for a transfer of this adversary proceeding to the district court is denied.”

In re Wiczek
· 2011-06-16
Objection to claim of exemption (Chapter 7 trustee) Granted

“The Trustee’s objection is sustained.”

Request for evidentiary hearing and sanctions (Chapter 7 trustee) Denied

“The Trustee’s request for an eviden-tiary hearing on her allegations of bad faith, and any inherent request for imposition of sanctions on the Debtors, is denied.”

In re John O. Murrin III and In re Devonna Murrin
· 2012-01-04
Involuntary chapter 7 petition (Petitioning creditors in John O. Murrin III's case) Granted

“There is a basis under 11 U.S.C. § 303(h) for ordering relief under Chapter 7, as to the debtors in both of these cases.”

Involuntary chapter 7 petition (Petitioning creditors in Devonna Murrin's case) Granted
Motion to change venue (Debtors) Denied

“The Debtors’ request for a change of the venue of these cases is denied.”

Town Centre Self Storage, LLC v. Conoryea (In re Conoryea)
· 2011-11-03

The signed trial judgment fixed a debt and excepted it from discharge; it is retained for reasoning but excluded from motion statistics.

Stoebner v. PNY Technologies, Inc. (In re Polaroid Corp.)
· 2011-07-07

The signed procedural order required consent statements and took the cross-motions under advisement without deciding them.

Sullivan v. Welsh (In re Lumbar)
· 2011-03-03
Summary judgment (Plaintiff) Denied

“The Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment is denied, in its entirety.”

Summary judgment (Defendants) Granted

“The Defendants are entitled to summary judgment in their favor, on Counts II-V of the Plaintiffs complaint”

In re Chapman
· 2010-06-10
Motion to dismiss chapter 7 case (United States Trustee) Denied

“the motion of the United States Trustee for dismissal of this case pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 707(b)(1) is denied.”

Community Finance Group, Inc. v. Fields (In re Fields)
· 2011-04-12
Summary judgment (Defendant) Granted in part

“1. The Defendant is not personally indebted to the Plaintiff under a promissory note in favor of the Plaintiff that was executed by the Defendant in a capacity as CEO of Main Street Otsego, LLC on November 6, 2008, either as a promisor or as a guarantor. 2. In this adversary proceeding, the Plaintiff may not seek to have the Defendant found personally liable to it on the ground that the corporate veil of Main Street Otsego, LLC may be pierced, and that the Defendant therefore is obligated to the Plaintiff on the debt of Main Street Otsego, LLC to the Plaintiff. 3. The Defendant’s motion for summary judgment is denied in all other respects.”

In re Savage
· 2010-03-25
Motion for post confirmation modification (Debtors) Denied

“The Debtors’ modified plan is not approved.”

In re Keenan
· 2011-01-07
Objection to claim of exemption (Chapter 7 trustee) Granted

“The Trustee’s objection is sustained.”

In re Carlson
· 2009-10-09
Motion for relief from automatic stay (Village Bank) Granted

“Village Bank is granted relief from the automatic stay of 11 U.S.C. § 362(a)”

A historical record

Judge Kishel no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.