Thaddeus Michael Machrowicz

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan district Retired 1970 · served 1961–1970 Appointed by John F. Kennedy (Democratic) 17 signed orders read

Judge Machrowicz no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

How Judge Machrowicz decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

Machrowicz accepted unrefuted sworn deposition testimony as sufficient proof of insolvency when every party had notice and an opportunity to contest it.

“the unrefuted sworn testimony of the Trustee on deposition, of which all parties had notice and at which they could appear and cross-examine the deponent, affords sufficient proof to the Court to warrant a finding of insolvency”

He looked to the parties’ underlying municipal contracts to identify tax-exempt interest even though the payment instruments did not state interest on their face.

“the fact that a prevision for interest was not on the face of the drain order is immaterial to the nature of the deduction as interest.”

Procedural preferences

Machrowicz deferred to the issuing judge’s probable-cause determination unless the record showed that judgment had been exercised arbitrarily.

“a determination that probable cause exists should be accepted by this Court unless it is shown that the Commissioner’s judgment was arbitrarily exercised.”

He enforced Rule 60’s party limitation and also expected prompt action from a movant seeking equitable relief from a judgment.

“Movant not only knew of the provisions of the amended decree but the amendment was effected upon his own suggestion.”

Cautions

Machrowicz emphasized that preliminary injunctions require a concrete probability of statutory violation and must be issued with great caution.

“the discretionary power of granting a preliminary injunction must be exercised with great caution.”

In patent prosecution disputes, he treated incomplete disclosure of pre-critical-date sales as a failure of the candor and good faith owed to the patent office.

“did not exercise that candor and good faith required of applicants standing before the Patent Office.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Mutual Benefit Life Insurance v. McGuire
Summary judgment (guardian for minor children) Denied

“the motion of Dana McGuire, guardian of Kathleen Ellen McGuire and Daniel Michael McGuire, minors, defendants, for summary judgment, is denied”

Summary judgment (administratrix of estate) Granted

“the motion of Susan McGuire, administratrix of the estate of James M. McGuire, deceased, for summary judgment, is granted.”

Rice v. Stoepler
Motions to dismiss (respondent) Granted

“respondent’s motion to dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus be, and it hereby is granted.”

Boots & Saddles, Inc. v. United States
Tax refund claim (plaintiff) Denied

“An order may therefore be entered in accordance with this finding, for the dismissal of the plaintiff’s complaint with prejudice and with costs to the defendant.”

Eisele v. St. Amour
Declaratory judgment of patent invalidity (plaintiff) Denied

“The St. Amour patent is valid and the plaintiff has not sustained its burden of proof in its attempt to overcome this presumption of validity.”

Declaratory judgment of noninfringement (plaintiff) Denied

“Claims 3 and 4 of the St. Amour patent are infringed by the accused gauges made by the plaintiff.”

Request for permanent injunction (defendant patent owner) Granted

“The defendant is entitled to a judgment enjoining the plaintiff, and those in privity with him, from further infringement of the St. Amour patent”

Request for accounting (defendant patent owner) Granted

“and to an accounting for damages for plaintiff’s past infringement.”

United States v. Leland Door Co.
Summary judgment (United States) Granted

“the motion of the plaintiff, United States of America, for summary judgment, is hereby granted”

Consumers Power Co. v. Rubiner
Claim to interpleaded fund (United States) Granted

“The Court finds that the claim of the United States, being based upon a lien arising under Sec. 6321 of the Internal Revenue Code, has priority over the claim of the Michigan Employment Security Commission and all other claims filed herein.”

United States v. West Willow Apartments, Inc.
Motion to amend judgment (foreclosure purchaser) Denied

“the motion to amend the decree of foreclosure is denied”

Zeunen Corp. v. United States
Tax refund claim (plaintiff) Denied

“That a judgment be entered dismissing the plaintiff’s Complaint.”

Henderson v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
Summary judgment (defendant insurer) Granted

“defendant’s motion for a summary judgment of no cause of action in its favor must be granted.”

Sam Goldfarb Plymouth, Inc. v. Chrysler Corporation
Preliminary injunction (plaintiff) Denied

“the order to show cause and the petition for preliminary injunction are denied.”

United States v. Gorman
Motion to dismiss criminal complaint (defendant) Moot / procedural

“the motion for the dismissal of the complaint and warrant is a moot one.”

Motion to suppress (defendant) Denied

“DENYING the motion to quash the search warrant and to suppress and return the property seized pursuant to the execution of the search warrant.”

Marsh Monument Co. v. United States
Tax refund claim (plaintiff) Granted

“Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed that the plaintiff have judgment against the defendant for the principal amount of $16,469.60 with interest thereon at six percent according to law and its costs.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

No exact-name tenure case records were located, so this profile makes no caseload-mix, duration, administrative-disposition, or motion-timing claim.

A historical record

Judge Machrowicz no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.