Robert Hardy Cleland

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan Appointed by George H. W. Bush (Republican) 11 signed orders read

How Judge Cleland decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

On trade-dress summary judgment, grants a plaintiff's motion on counterclaims, distinctiveness, and non-functionality but denies it on infringement where the plaintiff has not proved every required element.

“Plaintiff In-N-Out's motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 32) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.”

Procedural preferences

Grants Rule 12(c) judgment on the pleadings on a federal count and then declines supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state-law claims, dismissing them without prejudice.

“Defendant Esbri's “Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings & for Summary Judgment” (ECF No. 29) is GRANTED to the extent that he is entitled to judgment on the pleadings as it relates to Count I.”

Cautions

Treats reconsideration as not a vehicle for 'a second bite at the apple'; denies it absent an outcome-changing mistake, and grants 28 U.S.C. 1292(b) interlocutory certification only sparingly.

“IT IS ORDERED that Berg's “Motion for Rehearing, or Reconsideration or, in the Alternative, to Certify An Order for Interlocutory Appeal” (ECF No. 34) is DENIED.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Stanalajczo v. Esbri
3:21-cv-12422-RHC-JJCG · 2023-03-28
Judgment on pleadings (defendant) Granted

“Defendant Esbri's “Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings & for Summary Judgment” (ECF No. 29) is GRANTED to the extent that he is entitled to judgment on the pleadings as it relates to Count I.”

Zarza v. University of Michigan, Board of Regents
3:18-cv-13862-RHC-DRG · 2022-08-02
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“IT IS ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 44) is GRANTED. A separate judgment will issue.”

In-N-Out Burgers v. Doll N Burgers LLC
3:20-cv-11911-RHC-APP · 2022-03-14
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Granted in part

“Plaintiff In-N-Out's motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 32) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.”

Summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“IT IS ORDERED that Defendants' joint Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 37) is DENIED.”

Daniels v. Christoff
2:20-cv-10469-RHC-PTM · 2022-07-14
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“Defendants' motion for summary judgment on the basis of exhaustion and to dismiss is GRANTED. Defendant Golson is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE”

Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“Defendants' Christoff, Warren and Greason claims in their official capacities are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.”

Derrick v. Correct Care Solutions
3:19-cv-13105-RHC-KGA · 2021-05-20
Motion for entry of judgment (plaintiff) Granted in part

“IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's “Motion for Entry of Judgment and for Return of Copies” (ECF No. 52) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.”

Interquim, S.A. v. Berg Imports, LLC
3:21-cv-10665-RHC-DRG · 2022-06-21
Motion for reconsideration (defendant) Denied

“IT IS ORDERED that Berg's “Motion for Rehearing, or Reconsideration or, in the Alternative, to Certify An Order for Interlocutory Appeal” (ECF No. 34) is DENIED.”

Weaver v. Whitmer
3:20-cv-10519 · 2023-04-27
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“the motions will be denied”

Judgment on the pleadings (plaintiff) Denied
Security National Insurance Co. v. Salient Landscaping, Inc.
2:22-cv-10555 · 2023-05-01

Acting on its own show-cause order, the court vacated its prior summary judgment and judgment against Salient, reopened the case, and set aside the clerk's entry of default after finding certified-mail service improper, while granting a short extension to perfect service. A pending motion for determination of defense costs and default judgment (ECF No. 37) was terminated as moot: quote "(ECF No. 37) is TERMINATED AS MOOT." No party motion was decided on the merits.

United States v. Saad
3:19-cr-20701 · 2023-05-16
Motion for early termination of supervised release (defendant) Denied

“request for early termination of supervised release (ECF No. 38) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE”

Brown v. Floyd
3:22-cv-11156 · 2023-06-12
Petition for writ of habeas corpus (petitioner) Denied

“petition for writ of habeas corpus (ECF 1) is DENIED”

Seals v. Wayne County Employees' Retirement System
2:20-cv-11272 · 2023-06-23
Motion for reconsideration (defendant) Denied

“the court will deny WCERS”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

The reviewed matters include trademark, contract, employment-disability, prisoner civil-rights, and First Amendment cases. Judge Cleland's reduced senior docket also includes warrant and miscellaneous duty matters, which are excluded from the merits mix. This is a descriptive sample, not a complete caseload count.

Put Judge Cleland's record to work

Ezel drafts and answers grounded in this exact profile: how Judge Cleland actually rules, not a generic AI guess.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer is grounded in Judge Cleland's own signed orders and cites them.