Paul David Borman

How Judge Borman rules, drawn from 9 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Appointed by
Bill Clinton (Democratic)
Commissioned
1994-08-10
Education
University of Michigan (BA economics, 1959); University of Michigan Law School (JD, 1962); Yale Law School (LLM, 1964)
Signed orders read
9

How Judge Borman decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

On cross-motions in Social Security appeals, adopts the magistrate's recommendation and affirms the Commissioner under sentence four where the decision is supported.

“GRANTS Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 15), and AFFIRMS the findings of the Commissioner.”

Procedural preferences

On summary judgment in civil-rights suits, grants defense judgment on the federal claims with prejudice and then declines supplemental jurisdiction over the state-law claims, dismissing them without prejudice.

“ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, with Plaintiff's federal claims DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, and Plaintiff's state law claims DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.”

Cautions

Treats reconsideration as an extraordinary remedy, denying it where the movant merely disagrees with an earlier ruling and raises no new facts or argument.

“For those reasons, the Court DENIES Defendants' Motion for Reconsideration. (ECF No. 42.)”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Mathis (Estate of William Mathis) v. McInnis / Corizon
2:21-cv-10734-PDB-KGA · 2024-04-29
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“the Court GRANTS Defendants Erin Byrne, RN's and Kim Farris, PA's, Motions for Summary Judgment (ECF Nos. 92 and 93) and DISMISSES Plaintiff's claim against both Defendants WITH PREJUDICE.”

Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“GRANTING Defendant Kim Farris, PA's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF NO. 93)”

Javaar G. v. Commissioner of Social Security
2:22-cv-12818-PDB-EAS · 2024-02-15
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“DENIES Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 13)”

Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“GRANTS Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 15), and AFFIRMS the findings of the Commissioner.”

Lambeth-Greer v. Farmington Public Schools
2:21-cv-10752-PDB-CI · 2023-10-19
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted in part

“ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, with Plaintiff's federal claims DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, and Plaintiff's state law claims DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.”

Lorenz v. Lorenz
2:20-cv-13128-PDB-KGA · 2021-06-02
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“(2) Respondent's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 10) is DENIED.”

Harwood v. North American Bancard LLC / Gardner
2:18-cv-12567-TGB-EAS · 2020-07-08
Motion for reconsideration (defendant) Denied

“For those reasons, the Court DENIES Defendants' Motion for Reconsideration. (ECF No. 42.)”

Mitchell v. VanKeuren / City of Flint
2:18-cv-10376-PDB-DRG · 2020-06-12
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“(2) Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 36) is DENIED.”

Hittle v. Christiansen
2:21-cv-10905 · 2024-05-29
Petition for writ of habeas corpus (petitioner) Denied

“the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED. The Court also DENIES a certificate of appealability.”

Naranjo v. Belfor USA Group Inc.
3:22-cv-10924 · 2024-05-07
Motion for reconsideration (plaintiff) Denied

“(ECF No. 40) is DENIED”

Motion for leave to amend (plaintiff) Denied

“under Rules 59 or 60, the Court DENIES”

American Income Life Insurance Co. v. MR Financial Group, LLC
2:23-mc-51766 · 2024-05-28
Petition to enforce subpoena (petitioner) Granted

“ADOPTS the March 11, 2024 Report and Recommendation, and GRANTS the Petition to Enforce Compliance with American Arbitration Association Subpoena”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

The reviewed matters include prisoner civil-rights, employment, Social Security, habeas, criminal, and other civil disputes. Warrant and miscellaneous duty matters are excluded from the merits mix. This is a descriptive sample, not a complete caseload count.

Draft for Judge Borman with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Borman, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Borman's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace