Patricia T. Morris

“On July 31, 2019, Magistrate Judge Patricia T. Morris issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) recommending that the Court deny Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment and grant Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment... The Court agrees with Magistrate Judge Morris’s analysis and ADOPTS the R&R.”

“The Court GRANTS the Commissioner’s Motion for Summary Judgment and DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion.”

“Magistrate Judge Morris filed a report on January 29, 2021, recommending that the defendant’s motion for summary judgment be granted, the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment be denied, and the decision of the Commissioner be affirmed... the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 13) is DENIED.”

“the defendant’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 15) is GRANTED. The findings of the Commissioner are AFFIRMED.”

“the report issued on January 26, 2022 by Magistrate Judge Patricia T. Morris pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), recommending that the Court deny the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, grant the defendant’s motion for summary judgment, and affirm the Commissioner’s findings... the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 13) is DENIED.”

“the defendant’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 14) is GRANTED. The findings of the Commissioner are AFFIRMED.”

28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2) pro se screening recommendation, resolving no party motion. Morris recommended sua sponte dismissal of plaintiff's five federal-criminal-statute claims with prejudice (no private cause of action under 18 U.S.C. 241/246/249/607/1512) and his Sarbanes-Oxley whistleblower claim without prejudice (failure to plead exhaustion, leaving no subject-matter jurisdiction). District Judge Thomas L. Ludington adopted the recommendation (August 10, 2022) over objections, and denied a motion to stay. The adoption order states: “Magistrate Judge Patricia T. Morris, who recommended that this Court sua sponte dismiss Plaintiff’s criminal claims with prejudice and sua sponte dismiss Plaintiff’s Sarbanes-Oxley Act claim without prejudice... Judge Morris’s R&R... is ADOPTED.” The dismissal was mixed: with prejudice for the criminal claims, without prejudice for the Sarbanes-Oxley claim.

“IT IS RECOMMENDED that Defendant Kreisher’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 43) be GRANTED”

“Plaintiff Sharon’s “CounterMotion” for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 49) be DENIED WITH PREJUDICE.”

“IT IS RECOMMENDED that defendants’ motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 56) be DENIED.”

“defendant Nathan Falk’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 32) be GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.”

“I RECOMMEND that the Court grant the motion (ECF No. 189) and DISMISS this case WITHOUT PREJUDICE for Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute”

“For these reasons, Nevills’ motion to compel (ECF No. 37) is DENIED.”

“Obiakor’s motion to compel discovery responses (ECF No. 21) are hereby deemed RESOLVED.”

Sua sponte R&R recommending dismissal of the pro se prisoner complaint with prejudice for failure to prosecute under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) after plaintiff failed to serve process; no motion adjudicated. Grounding quote: “IT IS RECOMMENDED that this case be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) and Eastern District of Michigan Local Rule 41.2.”

Screening R&R recommending sua sponte dismissal of an IFP complaint under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2) as frivolous, the claims resting on rejected sovereign-citizen theories. Grounding quote: “IT IS RECOMMENDED that the Court DISMISS Thompson’s complaint, sua sponte, under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2).”