Patricia Jean Ehrhardt Pernick Boyle

How Judge Boyle rules, drawn from 24 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Boyle no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Position
district
Status
Retired 1983
Served
1978–1983
Appointed by
Jimmy Carter (Democratic)
Commissioned
1978-09-23
ABA rating
Qualified (1978)
Education
Wayne State University (B.A., J.D., 1963)
Signed orders read
24

How Judge Boyle decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

The court rejected an exhaustion defense after determining that the physician had pleaded a viable federal race-discrimination claim.

“there is no duty to exhaust administrative remedies prior to resort to the federal civil rights laws”

The court looked past the administrative label of a search when agents were actually seeking evidence for prosecution.

“the authorities are seeking evidence to be used in a criminal prosecution, the usual standard [of probable cause] will apply”

Procedural preferences

The court favored a short filing period for review of arbitration awards and rejected notice, lack of prejudice, and parallel litigation as reasons to excuse an eleven-month delay.

“the action would be untimely”

Cautions

The court distinguished fact-intensive antitrust disputes from a motion asking whether the pleaded conduct fit the statute as a matter of law.

“summary judgment may be inappropriate in complex antitrust cases where motive and intent are crucial issues”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Graves v. University of Michigan
· 1982-11-01
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff’s case must be and is hereby DISMISSED.”

United States v. Abbruzzese
· 1982-05-13
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Granted

“The Government’s motion for summary judgment is GRANTED”

Taylor v. Flint Osteopathic Hospital, Inc.
· 1983-04-15
Motion to dismiss or for summary judgment (defendants) Granted in part

“the motion to dismiss, or for summary judgment, is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part”

Hunters International Manufacturing Corp. v. Christiana Metals Corp.
· 1982-08-16
Motion for judgment notwithstanding verdict (defendants) Granted

“defendants’ Motion for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict is GRANTED”

United States v. Young
· 1981-11-30

The court imposed coercive custody and daily monetary sanctions after the remaining respondents failed to purge civil contempt for noncompliance with enforced tax summonses. No separately resolved party motion is classified.

United States v. Russo
· 1981-04-29
Motion to suppress (defendant) Granted

“the Defendant’s Motion to Suppress must be and is hereby GRANTED”

Sage International, Ltd. v. Cadillac Gage Co.
· 1982-11-19
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“defendant’s motion is GRANTED as to these claims”

Coley v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
· 1982-11-18

After a bench trial, the court entered judgment for the plaintiff on a sexual-harassment and constructive-discharge claim. The trial judgment is retained as context and excluded from motion statistics.

Toteff v. Village of Oxford
· 1983-01-14
Judgment on the pleadings (defendants) Granted

“defendants’ motions for judgment on the pleadings are hereby GRANTED”

Steinmetz Electrical Contractors Association v. Local Union No. 58, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers
· 1981-06-24
Summary judgment (all defendants) Granted

“Motions for summary judgment having been granted in favor of all Defendants”

Kirkland v. E.F. Hutton & Co.
· 1983-03-04
Summary judgment (defendants) Granted in part

“OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT”

Howell Industries, Inc. v. Sharon Steel Corp.
· 1981-12-31
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“Defendant’s Motions for Summary Judgment, filed on April 19,1980, and August 10, 1981, are hereby GRANTED.”

Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Boyle carried a general civil and criminal trial caseload in the Eastern District of Michigan before joining the Michigan Supreme Court. The contested outcomes described here come from her published opinions.

A historical record

Judge Boyle no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.