Nancy Garlock Edmunds

“the Commissioner's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 14) is DENIED.”

“Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 10) is GRANTED IN PART. The decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is REMANDED for further administrative proceedings consistent with the R&R and pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).”

“Having conducted a de novo review of the portions of the Magistrate Judge's report to which specific objections have been filed, the Court OVERRULES Defendants' objections and ACCEPTS AND ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation. Accordingly, Defendants' motion for summary judgment is DENIED.”

“For the foregoing reasons, Defendant's motion to dismiss is GRANTED.”

“Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint (ECF No. 38) is DENIED.”

“IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendants' motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and this case is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.”

“the Court GRANTS Defendants’ motion for summary judgment.”

“Defendants’ motion to dismiss is GRANTED as to Count Three and as to all claims against Mr. Preston in his individual capacity. Defendants’ motion to dismiss is in all other respects DENIED.”

“the DPOA’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED”

“Plaintiff’s motion for sanctions is DENIED”

“Plaintiff’s motion to exclude the expert report and testimony of the TEAM Experts is GRANTED.”

“Plaintiff’s motion to exclude expert reports and testimony of Dr. Lee E. Branscome is DENIED.”

“Defendant’s motions to exclude expert reports, opinion testimony, and the sur-rebuttal report of Dr. Gerald Galloway are GRANTED.”

“the Court denies without prejudice Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification”

“Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration is DENIED.”

“GRANTS Defendants’ motion to dismiss. It is further ordered that Plaintiffs’ complaint is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice.”