Lawrence Paul Zatkoff

How Judge Zatkoff rules, drawn from 18 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Zatkoff no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Position
district
Status
Retired 2015
Served
1986–2015
Appointed by
Ronald Reagan (Republican)
Commissioned
1986-03-04
Education
University of Detroit (now University of Detroit Mercy) (B.S., 1962); Detroit College of Law (now Michigan State University College of Law) (J.D., 1966)
Signed orders read
18

How Judge Zatkoff decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

The court declined to turn the closed federal contract action into a separate dispute over a former lawyer's lien and claimed third-party rights.

“judicial economy and comity are better served by allowing a Michigan court to make the determinations of Michigan law required to resolve McAlpine’s claims.”

Procedural preferences

The court refused to dismiss a former inmate's medical-care action under a prisoner-only exhaustion provision.

“Since Plaintiff was not a prisoner at the time he commenced the present suit, the PLRA’s exhaustion requirement does not apply.”

Cautions

Although several product theories failed, conflicting evidence about design defect required a jury determination and kept implied warranty in the case.

“whether the router was defective is a genuine issue of material fact to be decided by the jury.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

TC Power Ltd. v. Guardian Industries Corp.
· 2013-08-28
Motion to enforce charging lien and settlement (plaintiff's former counsel) Denied

“IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that McAlpine’s Motion to Enforce Charging Lien and Settlement Agreement [dkt. 29] is DENIED.”

United States v. Demiro
· 2011-02-23
Motion to withdraw bankruptcy reference (United States) Granted

“IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Government’s motion to withdraw the bankruptcy reference (Case Nos. 10-71403, 10-71404) [dkt 2] is GRANTED.”

Nautilus Insurance Co. v. I.L.S. General Contractors, Inc.
· 2005-05-23
Default judgment (plaintiff Nautilus Insurance Company) Denied

“Defendant Nautilus's Motion for Default Judgment [dkt. # 20] is hereby DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.”

In re Smirman
· 2010-05-12
Motion to quash subpoena (nonparty Preston Smirman) Granted in part

“IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Smirman’s motion to quash subpoena [dkt 1] is GRANTED IN PART;”

Motion to seal (plaintiffs) Granted

“IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ unopposed motion to seal Exhibits D and E to their response brief [dkt 6] is GRANTED.”

Mabry v. Freeman
· 2007-06-14
Motions to dismiss (defendants) Denied

“Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss based on Plaintiffs failure to exhaust administrative remedies must be DENIED.”

Sims-Eiland v. Detroit Board of Education
· 1999-02-12
Motion to reassign case (defendant Detroit Board of Education) Denied

“IT IS ORDERED that defendant’s Motion to Reassign Case is denied insofar as it seeks reassignment pursuant to E.D.Mich. LR 83.11(b)(2).”

Sunseri v. Proctor
· 2007-05-02
Summary judgment (defendants) Granted

“IT IS ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED and Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED as moot.”

Summary judgment (plaintiffs) Moot / procedural
United States v. Flowers
· 2011-02-17
Motion to dismiss indictment (United States) Granted

“the Court hereby ORDERS that the Government’s Motion to Dismiss the Indictment With Prejudice (Docket # 27) is GRANTED.”

Johnson v. Black & Decker (U.S.), Inc.
· 2005-07-20
Summary judgment (defendant Black & Decker) Granted in part

“For the above reasons, the Court HEREBY GRANTS, in part, Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment.”

Monaghan v. Sebelius
· 2012-12-30
Motion for temporary restraining order (plaintiffs Thomas Monaghan and Domino's Farms Corp.) Granted

“IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Emergency Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order [dkt. 8] is GRANTED.”

Fayad v. Sebelius
· 2011-03-25
Summary judgment (plaintiff physician) Denied

“IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment [dkt 18] is DENIED”

Summary judgment (federal defendants) Granted

“IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ motion for summary judgment [dkt 21] is GRANTED.”

Auto Club Group Insurance Co. v. All-Glass Aquarium Co.
· 2010-05-27
Summary judgment (defendant All-Glass Aquarium) Granted

“IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant’s motion for summary judgment [dkt. 36] is GRANTED.”

Motion for leave to file excess pages (defendant All-Glass Aquarium) Granted

“Defendant’s motion for leave to file excess pages [dkt. 35] is GRANTED”

Summary judgment (defendant All-Glass Aquarium) Moot / procedural

“Defendant’s second-filed motion for summary judgment [dkt. 37] is DENIED as MOOT.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Zatkoff carried a general civil and criminal trial docket, served as chief judge, and continued handling cases in senior status. The contested outcomes described here come from his published district-court opinions.

A historical record

Judge Zatkoff no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.