Arthur Jeffrey Tarnow

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan district Retired 2022 · served 1998–2022 Appointed by Bill Clinton (Democratic) 24 signed orders read

Judge Tarnow no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Wolfe v. Commissioner of Social Security
2:15-cv-13854 · 2017-01-12
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Granted

“Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment [20] is GRANTED ... the case is REMANDED for an award of benefits consistent with the Report and Recommendation.”

Summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [24] is DENIED.”

Calloway v. Commissioner of Social Security
2:18-cv-11274 · 2019-08-13
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment [16] is DENIED.”

Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [20] is GRANTED.”

Soldan v. Robinson
2:19-cv-11334 · 2020-10-09
Summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“IT IS ORDERED that Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment [21] [26] are DENIED.”

Avery v. Benson (Michigan Secretary of State)
2:19-cv-10623 · 2020-01-10
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“the City of Detroit and the Detroit Police Department's Motion to Dismiss [7] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Secretary of State's Motion to Dismiss [17] is GRANTED.”

Ostroznik v. Commissioner of Social Security
2:18-cv-10262 · 2018-07-24
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“IT IS ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss [9] is GRANTED.”

Davis v. C.R. Bard, Inc.
2:11-cv-12556 · 2012-12-06
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted in part

“Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED PART.”

Davis v. U.S. Department of Labor Office of Labor Management Standards
2:16-cv-12134 · 2017-08-15
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative for Summary Judgment [15] is GRANTED.”

Sanders v. Sennholz
2:17-cv-10578 · 2017-07-28
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss [13] is GRANTED and Plaintiff’s claims are dismissed without prejudice.”

Preliminary injunction (plaintiff) Moot / procedural

“Plaintiff’s Motion for Emergency Injunctive Relief [14] is DENIED as moot”

Stricklen v. McKee
2:07-cv-15016 · 2008-08-08
Habeas petition (plaintiff) Denied

“the habeas corpus petition is DENIED.”

Woodruff v. Lafler
2:05-cv-74623 · 2007-02-14
Habeas petition (plaintiff) Denied

“the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.”

Perkins v. Benore Logistic Systems, Inc.
2:16-cv-13717 · 2017-02-02
Preliminary injunction (defendant) Denied

“Defendant’s Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction [8] is DENIED.”

Gordon v. Royal Palm Real Estate Investment Fund I, LLLP
2:09-cv-11770 · 2018-05-25
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted in part

“Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss [106] is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.”

A historical record

Judge Tarnow no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.