Arthur Jeffrey Tarnow

How Judge Tarnow rules, drawn from 24 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Tarnow no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled here.

Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Position
District judge
Status
Deceased
Served
1998–2022
Appointed by
Bill Clinton (Democratic)
Commissioned
May 22, 1998
Signed orders read
24

About Judge Tarnow

Arthur J. Tarnow was a judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan. Appointed by President William J. Clinton, Judge Tarnow received a commission on May 22, 1998. Judge Tarnow assumed senior status on May 26, 2010 and served until death on January 21, 2022.

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Wolfe v. Commissioner of Social Security
2:15-cv-13854 · 2017-01-12
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Granted

“Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment [20] is GRANTED ... the case is REMANDED for an award of benefits consistent with the Report and Recommendation.”

Summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [24] is DENIED.”

Calloway v. Commissioner of Social Security
2:18-cv-11274 · 2019-08-13
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment [16] is DENIED.”

Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [20] is GRANTED.”

Soldan v. Robinson
2:19-cv-11334 · 2020-10-09
Summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“IT IS ORDERED that Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment [21] [26] are DENIED.”

Avery v. Benson (Michigan Secretary of State)
2:19-cv-10623 · 2020-01-10
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“the City of Detroit and the Detroit Police Department's Motion to Dismiss [7] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Secretary of State's Motion to Dismiss [17] is GRANTED.”

Ostroznik v. Commissioner of Social Security
2:18-cv-10262 · 2018-07-24
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“IT IS ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss [9] is GRANTED.”

Davis v. C.R. Bard, Inc.
2:11-cv-12556 · 2012-12-06
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted in part

“Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED PART.”

Davis v. U.S. Department of Labor Office of Labor Management Standards
2:16-cv-12134 · 2017-08-15
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative for Summary Judgment [15] is GRANTED.”

Sanders v. Sennholz
2:17-cv-10578 · 2017-07-28
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss [13] is GRANTED and Plaintiff’s claims are dismissed without prejudice.”

Preliminary injunction (plaintiff) Moot / procedural

“Plaintiff’s Motion for Emergency Injunctive Relief [14] is DENIED as moot”

Stricklen v. McKee
2:07-cv-15016 · 2008-08-08
Habeas petition (plaintiff) Denied

“the habeas corpus petition is DENIED.”

Woodruff v. Lafler
2:05-cv-74623 · 2007-02-14
Habeas petition (plaintiff) Denied

“the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.”

Perkins v. Benore Logistic Systems, Inc.
2:16-cv-13717 · 2017-02-02
Preliminary injunction (defendant) Denied

“Defendant’s Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction [8] is DENIED.”

Gordon v. Royal Palm Real Estate Investment Fund I, LLLP
2:09-cv-11770 · 2018-05-25
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted in part

“Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss [106] is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.”

Pending matters in the official report

Judge Tarnow was last listed in the Civil Justice Reform Act report as of September 30, 2021.

Motions pending more than six months18
Bench trials submitted more than six months0
Bankruptcy appeals pending more than six months0
Social Security appeals pending more than six months2
Civil cases pending more than three years23
ReportMotions over six monthsCases over three years
Sep 20211823
Mar 20211420
Sep 20201815

A snapshot on that date: matters listed may since have been decided or reassigned. A motion referred to a magistrate judge is counted for both judges. Motions in multidistrict litigation, section 2255 cases and Social Security appeals are not counted, and a very large three-year count is generally a multidistrict docket. Source: Appendix A of the report (PDF); about the report.

A historical record

Judge Tarnow no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled here. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.