Thomas John Morris

How Judge Morris rules, drawn from 20 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Morris no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
United States District Court for the District of Maryland
Position
district
Status
Deceased
Served
1879–1912
Appointed by
Rutherford B. Hayes (Republican)
Commissioned
1879-07-01
Education
Harvard College, A.B. (1856); Read law (1861)
Signed orders read
20

How Judge Morris decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

In Baker, Morris treated a permanent structural defect in a ship's hatch as an unsafe working condition for which the vessel was responsible.

“if it is shown that through the negligence of the shipowners they are given an unsafe place in which to work, and the injury happens on that account, and without fault on the stevedores’ part, then the ship should be held liable.”

In Crown Cork, Morris focused on function and interchangeability when concluding that differently named bottle-cap features were only colorable variations.

“by equivalent means, which are called by different names, not different in substance, but with a difference only colorable.”

In The Dauntless, Morris emphasized the heightened obligation of a steam vessel to take all reasonably possible measures to avoid a sailing vessel.

“to exculpate her it must appear that she has done all that was reasonably possible to keep out of the way of the sailing vessel.”

Procedural preferences

In Storck Lumber, Morris applied federal bankruptcy administration despite an earlier state receivership when creditors timely invoked the national statute.

“the national bankrupt law is to govern the administration of the estate of all insolvent debtors who are within its provisions, and supersedes all the state laws having the like object”

In The Dorchester, Morris allowed repair-related agent expenses when they were necessary, reasonable, incurred in good faith, and actually paid.

“Where such an expense was necessary and reasonable, and has been incurred in good faith, and paid, I cannot see why it should be excluded”

In White, Morris avoided deciding the outer boundary of judicial review because the administrative result was correct even on the petitioner's facts.

“It is not necessary to inquire whether this is or is not one of the cases in which the decision of the executive officers is not subject to review by the courts”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

United States ex rel. White v. Hook
· 1908-11-02
Habeas corpus (petitioner) Denied

“The writ of habeas corpus will be dismissed”

The Princess
· 1911-01-12
Maritime supply lien (gasoline supplier) Denied

“The libel will be dismissed.”

Lancaster v. Witte
· 1910-01-22
Patent infringement claim (patent owner) Denied

“I will sign a decree dis missing the bill.”

The Cretan
· 1908-05-26
Collision claim (libelant against the Cretan) Denied

“I do not find any fault on the part of the steamship Cretan, and the libel must be dismissed.”

The Lauretta Spedden
· 1909-04-07
Collision claim (sailing-vessel claimant) Granted

“I find the tug solely to blame for the. collision, and will sign a decree in favor of the libelant.”

Baker v. Hamburg-American Packet Co.
· 1910-03-16
Personal injury claim (injured stevedore) Granted

“I find that the libelant has made out a case which entitles him to damages.”

Maryland ex rel. Kaupp v. Ellicott
· 1910-04-28
Collision claim (claimants against the tug Tormentor) Denied

“so far as the tug Tormentor is concerned, no case at all has been made out against her.”

Collision claim (claimants against the dredge owners) Denied

“we do not find that the facts proven justify a deqree in their favor.”

The Dorchester
· 1903-07-02
Collision damage exception (owner seeking photography costs) Denied

“The exception is overruled, and the commissioner’s ruling sustained.”

Collision damage exception (owner seeking protest-copy costs) Denied

“The disallowance of the item in Exhibit No. 4, for costs of certified copy of master’s protest, is approved for the same reason.”

Collision damage exception (owner seeking disputed painting, labor, material, and dry-docking costs) Denied

“This ruling is well supported by the testimony, and the exception is overruled.”

Collision damage exception (owner seeking disbursement commission) Granted

“I sustain the exceptions to the disallowance of the two last-mentioned items.”

Collision damage exception (owner seeking local repair-supervision fee) Granted
Crown Cork & Seal Co. v. Imperial Bottle Cap & Machine Co.
· 1903-06-19
Patent infringement claim (patent owner) Granted

“The injunction will be granted as prayed, with a reference for an account.”

Riggin v. Brown
· 1894-02-16

Morris held that Maryland public-works officials were not personally liable merely because an officer or crew member of a state vessel may have been negligent. The available text does not include a final decree on the libel.

The Dauntless
· 1908-05-15
Collision claim (schooner claimant) Granted

“I think that the proof sustains the allegations of the libel and that the libelant must succeed.”

In re Beauchamp
· 1900-04-09
Bankruptcy exemption claim (individual bankrupt partners) Denied

“the exemption claimed out of the partnership assets in the hands of the trustee by the individuals composing the firm cannot be allowed”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

No indexed assigned dockets were returned, so no sampled case mix is reported.

A historical record

Judge Morris no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.