Roger W. Titus

How Judge Titus rules, drawn from 7 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Titus no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled here.

Court
United States District Court for the District of Maryland
Position
District judge
Status
Deceased
Served
2003–2019
Appointed by
George W. Bush (Republican)
Commissioned
November 6, 2003
Education
Johns Hopkins University, B.A. (1963); Georgetown University Law Center, J.D. (1966)
Signed orders read
7

About Judge Titus

Roger W. Titus was a judge of the United States District Court for the District of Maryland. Appointed by President George W. Bush, Judge Titus received a commission on November 6, 2003. Judge Titus assumed senior status on January 17, 2014 and served until death on March 3, 2019.

How Judge Titus decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

In Sare, Titus granted the employer summary judgment on race and gender discrimination claims after finding the employee had not shown a prima facie case or evidence of pretext.

“the Court grants EDS’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Paper No. 24).”

Procedural preferences

In Gray, Titus quashed defective service on the employer but denied dismissal for lack of service because the self-represented plaintiff had given actual notice; he allowed 21 days for proper service.

“Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for lack of service of process will be denied.”

Cautions

In Ayres, Titus granted the defendants’ motion against an employee’s claims, finding her COBRA and FMLA claims time-barred and other claims unsupported by the record or law.

“COBRA claim is time-barred. ... Accordingly, her FMLA claim is time-barred.”

In Corbin, Titus dismissed a later suit against federal officials on res judicata grounds after concluding it repeated allegations from the plaintiff’s prior case.

“the Court will grant the Motion to Dismiss on the basis of res judicata.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Ayres v. Bierman, Geesing & Ward, LLC
8:09-cv-02077 · 2010-02-03
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“the Court will, by separate order, grant Defendants' Motion To Dismiss the Complaint or, In the Alternative, for Summary Judgment (Paper No. 10)”

Summary judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“and deny Plaintiff's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (Paper No. 12).”

Johnson v. United States of America
1:10-cv-02591 · 2010-11-19
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“The motion to dismiss the individual defendants shall be granted.”

Taylor v. United States of America
8:11-cv-01748 · 2011-07-14
Habeas petition (petitioner) Denied

“the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus shall be denied without prejudice. A Certificate of Appealability shall not issue.”

Sare v. Electronic Data Systems, LLC
8:08-cv-01567 · 2009-10-13
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“the Court grants EDS's Motion for Summary Judgment (Paper No. 24).”

Fitzpatrick v. WMATA
8:13-cv-01085 · 2014-08-26
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“ORDERED, that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 21] is GRANTED”

Gray v. Allied Waste Services of Washington
8:11-cv-01612 · 2012-07-10
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for lack of service of process will be denied”

Motions to dismiss (defendant) Moot / procedural

“Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted will be denied as moot”

Corbin v. Lynch
8:16-cv-01495 · 2017-03-13
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“the Court will grant the Motion to Dismiss on the basis of res judicata.”

Summary judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“Corbin's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 12) will be denied because, as discussed above, the Defendants have shown that Corbin is not entitled to relief.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Median case duration in the sampled dockets: 228 days (N = 10).

Median motion-to-ruling time: 250 days (N = 4).

A sample of ten cases filed in spring 2013 includes foreclosure, insurance, tax, bankruptcy, employment, products-liability, personal-injury, and self-represented prisoner matters. The reviewed cases ranged from prisoner petitions screened within days to complex civil litigation lasting several years.

A historical record

Judge Titus no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled here. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.