Paula Xinis
How Judge Xinis rules, drawn from 26 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.
How Judge Xinis decides
Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.
What persuades
Conditional certification can be denied even at the notice stage when a developed record shows that job duties vary enough to require individualized inquiries. A uniform title and pay structure did not overcome substantial store-to-store differences in the reviewed FLSA case.
“the record as a whole underscores that Store Managers actual duties vary significantly from store to store, and division to division.”
A removing party that persists after clear jurisdictional defects are identified risks paying the opponent's remand expenses. In the reviewed case, the deficient notice and refusal to withdraw made the removal objectively unreasonable.
“From this, the Court concludes Loeffler’s removal efforts were objectively unreasonable, and an award of fees and costs is entirely proper.”
Procedural preferences
The judge expects concise, edited briefing and rarely allows excess pages. New arguments or expert opinions raised in reply may justify a limited surreply rather than being accepted without response.
“the Board’s response on behalf of Defendant Bowers and Brunson is repetitive and undisciplined; it could have easily fallen within the normal page limit had it been given a necessary edit.”
Cautions
Deliberate indifference requires more than negligence, imperfect care, or a protocol violation. A brief treatment delay did not become a constitutional violation where the provider promptly referred the patient and care followed the next morning.
“the brief delay in antibiotic treatment, while not ideal, simply does not rise to the level of deliberate indifference.”
Title VII retaliation requires a complaint that communicates opposition to unlawful discrimination. General workplace grievances or claims of unfair treatment do not qualify without that discrimination link.
“But ‘[g]eneral complaints of unfair treatment’ alone do not amount to protected activity.”
Signed rulings
A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.
“The Partial Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant CACI International, Inc. (ECF No. 3) BE, and the same hereby IS, GRANTED”
“Defendants' Motion, construed as one for summary judgment, is GRANTED.”
“Plaintiffs have failed to meet the heavy burden of demonstrating good grounds to grant reconsideration. The motion is therefore DENIED.”
“Defendant ADT's Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 9, is GRANTED, and Plaintiff BELINDA C. WATSON's Complaint, ECF No. 2, is DISMISSED”
“Plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment is granted in part and denied in part.”
“Defendant's motion for partial summary judgment is also granted in part and denied in part.”
“the Court dismisses the claims against Defendants Warden Ronald Weber and the Commissioner of Correction, grants summary judgment in Officer Vincent Lark's favor, and denies Moore's motion for summary judgment.”
“denies Moore's motion for summary judgment.”
“Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration (ECF No. 44) is DENIED.”
“For the foregoing reasons, the Court grants Hawk's motion for summary judgment.”
“For the foregoing reasons, TJX's motion for summary judgment is granted.”
“For the following reasons, the motions are GRANTED.”
“Because Jefferson cannot cure the legal infirmities of the claims, the Complaint must be dismissed with prejudice.”
“Motion for Remand (ECF No. 7), filed by Plaintiff Gregory H. Sachs ... BE, and the same hereby IS, GRANTED”
“Because the claims raised in this Petition is moot, the Petition is dismissed.”
Caseload & timing
From public federal docket records for this judge.
Median case duration in the sampled dockets: 261.5 days (N = 12).
Median motion-to-ruling time: 5.5 days (N = 4).
- The reviewed 2020-2023 filings show a broad civil mix, including employment, copyright, construction and contract, employee-benefits, immigration mandamus, prisoner habeas, and subpoena-enforcement matters.
- Xinis sits in the Southern Division at Greenbelt.
- Her later docket includes prominent immigration and separation-of-powers litigation against the federal government, including Abrego Garcia v. Noem.
Draft for Judge Xinis with the record in hand
Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Xinis, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Grounded in Judge Xinis's own signed orders
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace