James Kelleher Bredar

How Judge Bredar rules, drawn from 20 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
United States District Court for the District of Maryland
Position
district
Appointed by
Barack Obama (Democratic)
Commissioned
2010-12-17
Education
Harvard University, B.A. (1979); Georgetown University Law Center, J.D. (1982)
Signed orders read
20

How Judge Bredar decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

In Century Metal, Bredar set aside defaults where delay had caused no particular prejudice and a decision on the merits better served justice.

“In summary, the Court concludes it would be inappropriate to leave in place the entries of default and it would be equally inappropriate to enter default judgments against MWI and Worldwide.”

Procedural preferences

In Brown, Bredar paired dismissal with another opportunity to plead where the plaintiff was self-represented and earlier allegations suggested a potentially curable claim.

“In light of Plaintiff’s pro se status and the more detailed allegations contained in Plaintiff’s original complaint, the Court will grant Plaintiff leave to file a second amended complaint.”

He applies the strong presumption of public access to sealing requests, ordinarily requiring the motion, legal argument, and proposed order themselves to remain public and any redactions to be narrowly tailored.

“That high bar means it is almost never appropriate to seal a motion to seal, the legal arguments made in support, or the proposed order.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

CBX Technologies, Inc. v. GCC Technologies, LLC
1:10-cv-02112 · 2012-12-03
Motion for reconsideration (plaintiff) Denied

“CBX’s arguments have been considered and its motion to reconsider will be denied.”

Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“Defendant’s motion will be granted and Plaintiff’s motions will be denied.”

Summary judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“CBX has failed to show that it is entitled to partial summary judgment and its motion will be denied.”

Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“Accordingly, GCC’s motion, treated alternatively as a motion to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, will be denied.”

Willis v. Social Security Commissioner
1:11-cv-01665 · 2011-12-13
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“the Commissioner’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 10) will be granted without prejudice.”

Motions to transfer (defendant) Moot / procedural

“The Commissioner’s Motion for Transfer to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia will be denied as moot.”

United States v. Belzner
1:12-cr-00103 · 2020-07-27
Motion for evidentiary hearing (defendant) Denied

“his Emergency Motion for Evidentiary Hearing will be DENIED.”

Motion for compassionate release (defendant) Denied

“Belzner’s Emergency Motion for Compassionate Release (ECF No. 407) is DENIED.”

Brown v. Experian Credit Reporting
1:12-cv-02048 · 2012-12-17
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“an order shall issue GRANTING Defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint (ECF No. 15) and GRANTING Plaintiff leave to file a second amended complaint”

Century Metal Recycling Private Limited v. Metal Worldwide, Inc.
1:12-cv-02650 · 2015-08-17
Motion to set aside entries of default (defendant) Granted

“Defendants’ motion to set aside the entries of default (ECF No. 188) IS GRANTED.”

Default judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment (ECF No. 184) IS DENIED.”

Fundamental Administrative Services, LLC v. Anderson
1:13-cv-01708 · 2013-06-26
Motion for reconsideration (plaintiff) Granted in part

“the motion (ECF No. 14) for reconsideration of the Court’s June 24, 2013, order is GRANTED to the extent the Court has now considered Plaintiff’s reply brief and supporting materials.”

Fundamental Administrative Services, LLC v. Anderson
1:13-cv-01708 · 2013-10-09
Preliminary injunction (plaintiff) Granted in part

“Plaintiff’s motion (ECF No. 28) is GRANTED IN PART and this Preliminary Injunction is ENTERED.”

Fundamental Administrative Services, LLC v. Anderson
1:13-cv-01708 · 2015-05-13
Preliminary injunction (plaintiff) Denied

“The motion for preliminary injunction is ripe (ECF Nos. 173, 174, 179, and 182) and involves no disputes of fact. It will be denied.”

Benisek v. Lamone
1:13-cv-03233 · 2017-02-14
Motion for protective order (defendant) Granted

“Defendants’ motion for a protective order is GRANTED and that the notice issued by Plaintiffs under Rule 30(b)(6) is QUASHED.”

United States v. Johnson
1:14-cr-00356 · 2020-04-20
Motion for compassionate release (defendant) Denied

“Johnson’s Motion for Compassionate Release (ECF No. 303) is DENIED.”

Bowman v. Gross
1:14-cv-04039 · 2015-09-17
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“the Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED, on both grounds proffered by the Defendants.”

Richardson v. Lambert
1:15-cv-02518 · 2016-04-26
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“a separate order shall be entered granting defendant Lambert’s motion for summary judgment”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Median case duration in the sampled dockets: 459 days (N = 5).

Median motion-to-ruling time: 161 days (N = 4).

The sampled matters include habeas, prisoner civil rights, administrative review, personal-property damage, ERISA, civil racketeering, False Claims Act litigation, and newly filed matters without a coded nature of suit. Five cases were terminated and five remained pending at the time of review.

Draft for Judge Bredar with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Bredar, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Bredar's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace