J. Mark Coulson

How Judge Coulson rules, drawn from 19 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
United States District Court for the District of Maryland
Position
Magistrate judge
Commissioned
August 1, 2014
Education
La Salle University, B.A., magna cum laude (1985); Duke University School of Law, J.D., Order of the Coif (1991)
Signed orders read
19

About Judge Coulson

J. Mark Coulson joined the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland as a magistrate judge in 2014 and was reappointed in 2022. His work on the court includes settlement proceedings.

Judge Coulson's practices and standing orders

The court's website lists no individual practices or standing orders of Judge Coulson's own (checked October 9, 2026), so the court's local rules and general orders are the place to look (court page ↗).

Standing orders for every case in this court

Orders the court applies to all of its cases, whichever judge has them, as published on the court's website (checked October 9, 2026).

Key rules from these orders · The court's local rules ↗

How Judge Coulson decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

In Smith v. BLD Services, an overtime misclassification suit decided with the parties' consent, Coulson denied the employer's summary-judgment motion because a factual dispute remained over whether management was the construction superintendent's primary duty.

“Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 25) is DENIED”

Procedural preferences

In O'Connell v. Brigham, a confessed-judgment case, Coulson required the plaintiff to amend its pleading to establish diversity jurisdiction before recommending entry of a $106,400 judgment.

“I recommend that the Court direct the Clerk to enter the confessed judgment against Defendants, jointly and severally, in the amount of $106,400.00”

When the plaintiff showed repeated efforts to serve a defendant, Coulson granted more time but required a stronger showing before allowing alternative service.

“Plaintiff’s Motion (ECF No. 21) is hereby GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.”

Cautions

In Diaz Mancilla v. Chesapeake Outdoor Services, Coulson partly granted a prevailing wage-and-hour plaintiff's fee petition, reducing the requested fees rather than awarding the full amount.

“Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees (ECF No. 101) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART”

In a disability retaliation case, Coulson permitted a mental examination but limited its duration, examiner, methods, and topics to the diagnoses and allegations in dispute.

“the Court will not permit an open door to the exploration of any mental health topic”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Smith v. BLD Services, LLC
1:17-cv-00167 · 2018-02-21
Summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 25) is DENIED”

Diaz Mancilla v. Chesapeake Outdoor Services, LLC
1:22-cv-00032 · 2024-05-31
Motion for attorney fees (plaintiff) Granted in part

“Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees (ECF No. 101) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART”

Motion for leave (plaintiff) Granted

“Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Affidavit in Support of Fee Petition Out of Time (ECF No. 105) is GRANTED”

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Gateway International Logistics, Inc.
1:22-cv-02487 · 2023-03-13
Default judgment (plaintiff) Granted in part

“the undersigned recommends that ... The Court GRANT in part Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Default Judgment Pursuant to Rule 55(b)(2)”

O'Connell v. Brigham
1:23-cv-02208 · 2023-10-17
Confessed judgment (plaintiff) Granted

“I recommend that the Court direct the Clerk to enter the confessed judgment against Defendants, jointly and severally, in the amount of $106,400.00”

Caracillo v. XAU Ventures LLC
1:25-cv-02617 · 2025-09-18
Motion for alternative service (plaintiff) Granted

“For the reasons set forth above, Plaintiff’s Motion for Service of Process by E-Mail (ECF No. 10) is granted.”

Valentine v. Baltimore City Board of School Commissioners
1:23-cv-02899 · 2025-02-25
Motions to compel (plaintiff) Moot / procedural

“Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel, (ECF No. 33), shall be DENIED as moot.”

Motion for attorney fees (plaintiff) Denied

“the Court is unable to determine whether the fee sought is reasonable, and Plaintiff’s request for fees will also be denied.”

United Source One, Inc. v. Fells Point LLC
1:26-cv-00437 · 2026-07-01
Motions to compel (defendant) Granted

“Defendants’ Motion to Compel and to Extend the Discovery Schedule (ECF No. 15) is GRANTED.”

Motion to amend (plaintiff) Granted

“Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend/Correct its Opposition brief is GRANTED.”

Reichert v. Hornbeck
1:24-cv-01865 · 2025-02-13
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss (ECF Nos. 28, 34, and 35) shall be GRANTED and all claims set forth in Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint (ECF No. 17) are hereby dismissed. Dismissal shall be without prejudice”

Tina B. v. Social Security Administration
8:24-cv-01210 · 2025-04-04
Social security appeal (plaintiff) Granted

“Pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), the SSA’s judgment is REVERSED due to inadequate analysis. The case is REMANDED for further proceedings in accordance with this opinion.”

Weinberg v. Bisignano, Social Security Administration
1:24-cv-03517 · 2025-11-05
Motion for reconsideration (plaintiff) Granted

“Plaintiff’s Motion to Reconsider (ECF No. 17) is GRANTED. The case is REMANDED for further proceedings in accordance with this opinion.”

Angela D. v. Bisignano, Social Security Administration
1:25-cv-02317 · 2026-05-11
Social security appeal (plaintiff) Granted

“Pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), the SSA’s judgment is REVERSED due to an improper function-by-function assessment, and the decision of the SSA is REMANDED for further proceedings in accordance with this Letter Order and Opinion.”

Brunenkant v. Public Storage
1:24-cv-02375 · 2025-02-13
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Moot / procedural

“the Motion to Dismiss filed by Public Storage and Public Storage Operating Company (ECF No. 23) is hereby DENIED as MOOT without prejudice.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Median case duration in the sampled dockets: 62 days (N = 9).

Median motion-to-ruling time: 57 days (N = 7).

Coulson's consent civil caseload includes removed insurance and motor-vehicle disputes, wage cases, multiemployer pension-fund collections, and immigration mandamus actions that often end quickly once the agency acts. He is also frequently assigned to conduct settlement conferences.

Pending matters in the official report

Reported by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts under the Civil Justice Reform Act, as of March 31, 2026.

Motions pending more than six months0
Bench trials submitted more than six months0
Bankruptcy appeals pending more than six months0
Social Security appeals pending more than six months0
Civil cases pending more than three years1
ReportMotions over six monthsCases over three years
Mar 202601
Sep 202501
Mar 202500
Sep 202400
Mar 202400
Sep 202300
Mar 202301
Sep 202201
Mar 202202
Sep 202102
Mar 202102
Sep 202002

A snapshot on that date: matters listed may since have been decided or reassigned. A motion referred to a magistrate judge is counted for both judges. Motions in multidistrict litigation, section 2255 cases and Social Security appeals are not counted, and a very large three-year count is generally a multidistrict docket. Source: Appendix A of the report (PDF); about the report.

How long civil cases take in this court

For the whole of United States District Court for the District of Maryland, not for Judge Coulson: median time from filing to disposition of the civil cases the court closed in the 12 months ending September 30, 2025, as reported by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts.

CasesMedian time
All civil cases closed3,1916.7 months
Closed with no court action1515.7 months
Closed before pretrial2,5645.9 months
Closed during or after pretrial45713.6 months
Closed during trial1933.9 months
12 months endingCases closedMedian time
Sep 20253,1916.7 months
Sep 20243,1197.5 months
Sep 20233,3709 months
Sep 20223,0539.5 months
Sep 20212,6298.9 months
Sep 20202,4699 months
Sep 20192,7097.9 months

The table leaves out prisoner petitions, land condemnations, deportation reviews, recovery of overpayments and enforcement of judgments, and reports no median for fewer than 10 cases. A district that closed a large multidistrict litigation in the period shows very large counts and long medians for that year. Source: Table C-5, U.S. District Courts (spreadsheet).

Draft for Judge Coulson with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Coulson, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Coulson's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace