Michelle M. Harner

How Judge Harner rules, drawn from 19 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Maryland
Position
Bankruptcy judge
Commissioned
June 19, 2017
Signed orders read
19

About Judge Harner

Michelle M. Harner is a United States Bankruptcy Judge for the District of Maryland. She hears bankruptcy matters in Baltimore.

Judge Harner's practices and standing orders

Rules for cases before Judge Harner, as published on the court's website (checked October 10, 2026). Judges revise these often, so confirm the current version on the court's site before you file.

Key rules

Conferences

Register for telephonic or video hearings with the courtroom deputy at least 72 hours beforehand, unless the emergency nature of the hearing prevents it.

“Registration must be completed at least 72 hours prior to the start time of the hearing (unless the emergency nature of any given hearing makes such timing impractical).”

Conferences

Chapter 13 confirmation hearings take place in person at the Baltimore courthouse.

“All Chapter 13 confirmation hearings will be in person at the Baltimore Courthouse.”

Trial

File exhibits at least seven days before an evidentiary hearing or by the case-specific deadline.

“All exhibits must be filed on the Court’s docket at least 7 days before the hearing”

Trial

For a virtual evidentiary hearing, file a stipulation of uncontested facts by noon Eastern on the preceding day.

“By 12:00 p.m., Prevailing Eastern Time, on the day prior to the hearing, the parties shall file on the docket a stipulation of any uncontested facts with the Court.”

Standing orders for every case in this court

Orders the court applies to all of its cases, whichever judge has them, as published on the court's website (checked October 10, 2026).

Key rules from these orders · The court's local rules ↗

How Judge Harner decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

A creditor that receives notice and does not object is bound by the treatment in a confirmed Chapter 13 plan.

“a creditor’s failure to object to a debtor’s proposed chapter 13 plan binds the creditor to the terms of the confirmed plan.”

Procedural preferences

A summary-judgment request must be supported by evidence sufficient to eliminate genuine disputes of material fact.

“The Defendant submitted nominal evidence to support its requested relief on Counts III and IV”

Cautions

A reorganization proposal cannot use the new-value doctrine to preserve an unjustified windfall for prepetition equity.

“The Court cannot condone the windfall to the debtor’s prepetition equity proposed in this case.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

L.K. Comstock & Company, Inc. v. Reibie
19-00199 (01-64463) · 2020-03-02
Summary judgment (L.K. Comstock & Company, Inc.) Granted in part

“the Court will grant the Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and deny the Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, other than with respect to the requested sanctions.”

Summary judgment (Irene Reibie and related defendants) Denied
Maryland Department of Labor v. Thomas E. Sulser
19-00355 (19-18710) · 2020-02-19
Motions to dismiss (Thomas E. Sulser) Denied

“ORDERED, that the Motion is denied.”

In re Theodore Wood
18-11415 · 2018-09-25

The court held that a repeat filing terminated the automatic stay only as to the debtor and the debtor's property, leaving estate property protected.

In re Byung Mook Cho and The New Belvedere Cleaners, Inc.
17-22057 and 17-22058 · 2018-03-13
Motion to reject executory contract (Byung Mook Cho and The New Belvedere Cleaners, Inc.) Granted

“the Debtors may reject the Settlement Agreement under section 365(a) of the Code. The Court will enter a separate order consistent with, and granting the relief set forth in, this Memorandum Opinion.”

Jacqueline Chorba v. Quantum3 Group LLC
17-00380 (17-16032) · 2018-03-08
Motions to dismiss (Quantum3 Group LLC and MOMA Funding, LLC) Granted in part

“the Court will dismiss only Counts I and II of the Amended Complaint. The Court will enter a separate order granting in part, and denying in part, the Motion to Dismiss”

Forest Capital, LLC v. Fischer Porter & Thomas, P.C.
16-00337 (16-13850) · 2018-01-24
Motion for partial summary judgment (Forest Capital, LLC) Granted in part

“the Court grants the Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment to the extent that it seeks to avoid the Postpetition Transfer”

Motion for partial summary judgment (Fischer Porter & Thomas, P.C.) Denied

“denies the Defendant’s Cross Motion for Partial Summary Judgment in its entirety.”

Yolande E. Essangui v. SLF V-2015 Trust
16-00201 (16-12984) · 2017-10-02
Summary judgment (Yolande E. Essangui) Granted

“The Court will enter an Order granting the Debtor’s (Plaintiff’s) Motion for Summary Judgment”

Summary judgment (SLF V-2015 Trust) Denied

“denying the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment.”

In re Gregory Trepetin
20-11718 · 2020-07-07
Motion to extend subchapter v deadlines (Gregory Trepetin) Granted

“The Court will set extended deadlines for the Debtor, based on the date of the conversion of his chapter 7 case to one under chapter 11 of the Code.”

In re Robert Charles Dunkes, Sr.
19-19194 · 2020-11-16
Motion for relief from stay (Santander Consumer USA, Inc.) Denied

“Accordingly, the Court will deny the Stay Motion without prejudice.”

In re Darryenne Ford
20-16046 · 2020-10-16
Objection to plan confirmation (Tax-sale certificate creditor) Granted in part

“the Court will sustain the Creditor’s objection to plan confirmation, in part, and deny it in part.”

In re Lewis Evans, Jr.
19-19430 · 2021-04-27
Request to determine automatic stay inapplicable (First National Bank of Pennsylvania) Granted

“the Court determines that the automatic stay of section 362(a) of the Code does not apply to the Properties”

In re John McDonnell McPherson
21-10205 · 2021-06-02
Motion for relief from stay to continue arbitration (Camac Fund, L.P.) Granted in part

“the Court concludes that it must defer to the arbitration proceeding, but only as to the prepetition non-core claims asserted by the parties in that proceeding. It will, in turn, modify the automatic stay of section 362 of the Code for this limited purpose. All other issues and claims between the parties will remain subject to the automatic stay and resolution in connection with this chapter 11 case.”

Draft for Judge Harner with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Harner, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Harner's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace