E. Stephen Derby

How Judge Derby rules, drawn from 20 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Derby no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Maryland
Position
bankruptcy
Status
Retired 2019
Served
1987–2019
Commissioned
1987-12-09
Education
Wesleyan University; Harvard Law School
Signed orders read
20

How Judge Derby decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

The court favored a clear filing-time rule when the statutory language and bankruptcy structure supported one.

“The better result is to use as a bright line the moment of filing, as is done elsewhere in the Bankruptcy Code.”

Express retention of estate claims in a confirmed plan supported a representative's authority to pursue them for creditors.

“Section 1123(b)(3)(B) creates the requisite standing in the Litigation Trustee as representative of the estate to assert these state law fraudulent conveyance actions because these causes of action belong to the bankruptcy estate.”

Procedural preferences

A reorganizing debtor was expected to disclose known material assets fully before confirmation.

“USi was required to make full and honest disclosure of all its assets of which it was aware, in order for the bankruptcy reorganization process to remain true to its goals.”

Cautions

A post-confirmation request for additional pre-confirmation fees required attention to notice, funding, and the plan's binding terms.

“when the first alert that additional pre-confirmation fees will be claimed as an administrative expense payable from the plan is after the plan has been confirmed, there is a sandbagging effect on the plan and the confirmation process.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

In re Garrison C. Hudson
06-12949 · 2006-09-14
Request to determine automatic stay inapplicable (First Shore Federal Savings and Loan Association) Denied

“ORDERED, that the motion of First Shore Federal to declare the stay inapplicable because the Debtor is ineligible under 11 U.S.C. § 109(h)(1) is DENIED.”

Henry D. Hoge, et al. v. C. William Moore, et al.
05-01238 (01-64463) · 2006-07-13
Motions to dismiss (C. William Moore, Jeffrey J. Lewis, Michael P. Rivera, and Glass & Associates, Inc.) Granted in part

“For the reasons stated herein, the Court shall grant the motions to dismiss, in part, and shall remand the remaining claims to the California Superior Court, San Mateo County.”

Motions to dismiss (Michael R. Azarela and John G. Larkin) Granted in part
Motion to abstain or remand (Henry D. Hoge, Dona P. Hoge, and the Henry D. Hoge and Dona P. Hoge Family Trust) Granted in part

“ORDERED, that Claims Two, Three, Five, and Six in the Amended Complaint are REMANDED to California Superior Court, San Mateo County, Civil Action No. CIV 441948, for consideration of Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss and further proceedings”

In re Karen Abdul Muhaimin; In re Gail Brown; In re Raymond Carl Flythe
05-90314; 05-90230; 05-90128 · 2006-04-25
Motion for in rem relief from stay (Deutsche Bank National Trust Company) Granted in part

“MEMORANDUM AND ORDER AS TO REAL PROPERTY DENYING RELIEF UNDER 11 U.S.C. §362(d)(4) AND GRANTING CERTAIN IN REM RELIEF”

Motion for in rem relief from stay (Chase Home Finance LLC) Denied

“ORDERED, that Chase Home Finance LLC’s Motion for imposition of a statutory servitude under 11 U.S.C. §362(d)(4) on the property located at 1337 Chapelview Drive, Odenton, Maryland, is hereby DENIED”

Motion for in rem relief from stay (Community Development Administration) Denied

“ORDERED, that Community Development Administration’s Motion for imposition of a statutory servitude under 11 U.S.C. §362(d)(4) on the property located at 551 East 38th Street, Baltimore, Maryland, is hereby DENIED”

Heritage Associates II, L.L.C. v. State of Maryland, Department of Health and Mental Hygiene
05-1547 (03-58882) · 2006-01-10
Motions to dismiss (State of Maryland, Department of Health and Mental Hygiene) Granted

“For the reasons set forth above, the Committee's complaint will be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.”

In re Estate of Marilyn E. Roberts
05-26653 · 2005-08-15

The court dismissed a Chapter 13 case filed for a decedent's probate estate because the estate was not eligible to be a debtor.

Tidewater Finance Company v. Deborah Williams
04-01823 (03-16311) · 2005-06-28
Summary judgment (Tidewater Finance Company) Denied

“ORDERED that Tidewater’s Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED”

Objection to discharge (Tidewater Finance Company) Denied

“ORDERED that Tidewater’s objection to Debtor’s discharge under 11 U.S.C. §727(a)(8) is OVERRULED.”

Sterling Healthcare, Inc. v. American International Specialty Lines Insurance Company, et al.
04-2322 (02-67584) · 2005-06-28

The court clarified malpractice-insurance priorities and limited an injunction to prepetition malpractice claims under the confirmed plan.

Guttman v. Roy O. Martin, III, et al.; Guttman v. Harsco Corporation, et al.; Guttman v. Craig A. Simmons, et al.
03-5781; 03-5784; 03-5795 (01-64463) · 2005-05-05
Motions to dismiss (Roy O. Martin, III, and related defendants) Denied

“Therefore, the motions to dismiss will be denied by separate order entered in each adversary proceeding.”

Motions to dismiss (Harsco Corporation and related defendants) Denied
Motions to dismiss (Craig A. Simmons and related defendants) Denied
In re Cleo Khary McDuffie
03-65333 · 2005-02-22
Fee application (Debtor's counsel) Denied

“ORDERED, that the fee application of Debtor's counsel is DENIED, except to the extent the fees have been paid or included in the plan amount, with leave to amend to identify a source of payment consistent with this opinion.”

In re Dunn Industries, LLC
04-23386 · 2005-01-28
Motion for relief from stay (Heathcon Holdings, LLC) Denied

“ORDERED, that Heathcon Holdings, LLC’s Motion for Relief from Stay is DENIED.”

Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. Scott G. Smith
03-5971 (03-63389) · 2004-11-12
Cross motion for summary judgment (Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland) Granted

“ORDERED, that the Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment by the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland is GRANTED”

Summary judgment (Scott G. Smith) Denied

“ORDERED, that the Debtor’s Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED.”

Tracy Lucas v. Demetrius Nickens and Fresh Start Solutions, Inc.
03-8247 (03-60363) · 2004-07-12
Motions to dismiss (Demetrius Nickens and Fresh Start Solutions, Inc.) Denied

“ORDERED, that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is DENIED.”

A historical record

Judge Derby no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.