David E. Rice

How Judge Rice rules, drawn from 13 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Maryland
Position
Bankruptcy judge
Commissioned
April 1, 2011
Signed orders read
13

About Judge Rice

David E. Rice is a United States Bankruptcy Judge for the District of Maryland. He hears bankruptcy matters in Baltimore.

Judge Rice's practices and standing orders

Rules for cases before Judge Rice, as published on the court's website (checked October 10, 2026). Judges revise these often, so confirm the current version on the court's site before you file.

Key rules

Conferences

Connect to a videoconference hearing at least five minutes before its scheduled start.

“Each party must connect to the videoconference at least 5 minutes prior to the start time of the scheduled hearing.”

Conferences

Chapter 13 confirmation hearings take place in person at the courthouse.

“All Chapter 13 confirmation hearings will be in person at the Courthouse.”

Trial

File evidentiary hearing exhibits at least seven days before the hearing or by the deadline in the scheduling order.

“All exhibits must be filed on the docket at least seven (7) days before the hearing or by the exhibit submission deadline imposed by a scheduling order in the particular contested matter or proceeding.”

Standing orders for every case in this court

Orders the court applies to all of its cases, whichever judge has them, as published on the court's website (checked October 10, 2026).

Key rules from these orders · The court's local rules ↗

How Judge Rice decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

The court enforced the terms of a confirmed plan against parties that had notice and did not object.

“Because a confirmed plan is binding on the parties, the court concludes that in this case the condominium also should be granted relief from the stay, but only to pursue collection from the debtor of the post-petition assessments that accrued prior to confirmation of the Chapter 13 plan.”

Procedural preferences

A request to stay an order pending appeal must establish a meaningful likelihood of success and address the remaining equitable factors.

“Thus, I conclude that the Debtor has not demonstrated that he has a substantial possibility of success on the merits of his appeal.”

Cautions

Retroactive annulment of the automatic stay is reserved for unusual circumstances where the equities strongly favor validation.

“This case presents the sort of unusual and compelling circumstance in which it is appropriate to grant retroactive relief to validate action that might otherwise be void by reason of violation of the automatic stay.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

In re Jeong Soon Kim and Young Pil Kim
18-26438 · 2019-08-02

The court deferred lien-avoidance relief until the competing lien priorities could be adjudicated with all affected parties present.

In re Assata N. Peterson
16-13521 · 2018-02-07
Motion for relief from stay (The Newport Condominium Association) Granted in part

“the court will enter a separate order consistent with this memorandum opinion that grants in part and denies in part the Motion for Relief from Automatic Stay filed by the Condominium.”

In re Christopher D. Wiley
16-15361 · 2018-01-26
Motion for relief from stay (Council of Unit Owners of Waterford Landing Condominium) Granted in part

“grants in part and denies in part the Motion for Relief from Automatic Stay filed by the Condominium”

Request to appoint person to sell property (Christopher D. Wiley) Denied

“denies the Debtor’s request for appointment of a person to sell the”

In re Glenn D. Schweiger
17-19857 · 2018-01-19
Motion for stay pending appeal (Glenn D. Schweiger) Denied

“ORDERED, that the Debtor’s Motion to Stay Order Granting Relief from Automatic Stay Pending Appeal should be, and it hereby is. DENIED.”

Chesapeake Employers Insurance Company v. Antonio M. Flores
16-00197 (16-10108) · 2017-09-08
Request to except debt from discharge (Chesapeake Employers Insurance Company) Denied

“the court will enter a separate order that denies with prejudice all relief sought in CEIC’s complaint.”

In re Brandon; In re Rucker; In re Burrows; In re Everest
14-23735; 14-27630; 14-28940; 14-29084 · 2015-09-10
Motion for payment of allowed fees (Counsel for Margret E. Brandon) Granted

“For these reasons, I conclude that Harris does not preclude the court from directing Chapter 13 trustees to pay funds remaining in their possession to debtor’s counsel up to the amount of the attorney’s fee allowed in cases that are dismissed or converted prior to confirmation of a Chapter 13 plan.”

Motion for payment of allowed fees (Counsel for James L. and Belinda A. Rucker) Granted
Motion for payment of allowed fees (Counsel for Cynthia B. Burrows) Granted
Motion for payment of allowed fees (Counsel for Arthur D. Everest) Granted
Donna Giordano v. Thomas Todd Collins
14-00733 (14-15351) · 2015-09-01
Request to except debt from discharge (Donna Giordano) Denied

“the claim asserted by Donna Giordano against Todd Collins is not excepted from discharge under § 523(a)(2)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code.”

In re Marquis McCrimmon
13-31216 · 2015-08-26
Motion to annul stay (Dane Equities, LLC) Granted

“grants the Motion to Annul Stay and annuls the automatic stay under 11 U.S.C. § 362 as to the Property and the Tax Sale Foreclosure”

Motion to void tax sale (FCI Lender Services, Inc.) Moot / procedural

“denies the Motion to Void Tax Sale as moot.”

Murray Kovens v. Walter Goodwich
13-00215 (13-10558) · 2014-09-17
Request to except debt from discharge (Murray Kovens) Granted

“the claim asserted by Kovens against Goodwich is excepted from discharge under both § 523(a)(2)(A) and § 523(a)(2)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code.”

Daisy Couloote Phillip v. David A. Reecher
12-00061 (11-30365) · 2014-08-08
Request to except judgment from discharge (Daisy Couloote Phillip) Granted in part

“grants in part and denies in part the relief sought in Daisy Phillip’s complaint filed in this adversary proceeding.”

In re Angela Maria Martise
12-24779 · 2013-03-19
Motion to disgorge petition preparer fee (United States Trustee) Granted

“the United States Trustee’s Motion to Disgorge Excessive Bankruptcy Petition Preparer Fee should be granted”

In re Wendy Maria Frazier
12-29668 · 2013-02-20
Motion to disgorge petition preparer fee (United States Trustee) Granted

“the United States Trustee’s Motion to Disgorge Excessive Bankruptcy Petition Preparer Fee should be granted”

Draft for Judge Rice with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Rice, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Rice's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace