Christopher J. Panos

How Judge Panos rules, drawn from 7 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Massachusetts
Position
bankruptcy
Commissioned
2015-09-21
Signed orders read
7

How Judge Panos decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

A complaint may proceed past dismissal when detailed facts support a plausible, fact-intensive theory even though proof remains for later stages.

“the Plaintiffs have alleged sufficient facts to state plausible claims at this stage to allow the Plaintiffs to elicit further evidence on this Count.”

Actual notice of a bankruptcy shifts responsibility to the creditor to prevent automated collection activity; lack of specific intent is not a defense.

“where a creditor receives actual notice, ‘the burden shifts to the creditor to prevent violations of the automatic stay’ and there is a presumption that a violation is deliberate.”

A nonconsensual third-party bar order demands restraint and a concrete showing of extraordinary circumstances, fairness, and benefit to the estate.

“the discretion to do so should be exercised with restraint and only in extraordinary circumstances not present in this case.”

Procedural preferences

A trustee must establish that a claim belongs to the bankruptcy estate before prosecuting it on the debtor's behalf.

“the Trustee has legal rights to the malpractice claims only if they are property of the bankruptcy estate under § 541(a)(1).”

An otherwise available federal exemption cannot be denied for bad faith without a statutory basis.

“Application of Siegel, therefore, requires this Court allow the Amendment Motion, as the Court is limited in its authority to deny the Debtor leave to amend his exemptions whether there was bad faith conduct or not.”

Cautions

Repeated noncompliance with discovery and scheduling orders can result in dismissal after warnings and lesser sanctions fail.

“Dismissal with prejudice for violation of [discovery] orders is well within the arsenal of the trial judge.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Ostrander v. Van Dam (In re Mateer)
· 2016-09-30
Motion to dismiss homestead malpractice claim (Michael Van Dam and Van Dam Law LLP) Granted

“As such, the Trustee’s complaint will be dismissed.”

Motion to dismiss conversion malpractice claim (Michael Van Dam and Van Dam Law LLP) Granted
In re Grove Instruments, Inc.
· 2017-07-14
Motion to approve settlement and third party bar order (Chapter 7 trustee) Denied

“For the foregoing reasons set forth and the authorities cited herein, the Motion is DENIED.”

In re Hoover
· 2017-07-17
Motion to amend schedules and exemptions (John E. Hoover) Granted

“the Amendment Motion shall be granted.”

Motion to approve personal injury settlement (Chapter 7 trustee) Denied

“the Court does not have to reach the issue of the reasonableness of the proposed settlement and shall deny that motion without prejudice.”

Petralia v. 145 Marston Street, Inc. (In re Petralia)
· 2016-09-30
Motion for summary judgment on automatic stay claim (145 Marston Street, Inc.; Cohen & Associates, P.C.; National Credit Adjusters, LLC) Granted in part

“The Court will enter judgment in favor of C & A and NCA on all Counts against them. Regarding the claims against Coady’s, summary judgment is granted in favor of Coady’s as to the FDCPA and ch. 93A claims and granted in favor of Mr. Petralia as to the § 362(k) claim.”

Motion for summary judgment on fdcpa claim (145 Marston Street, Inc.; Cohen & Associates, P.C.; National Credit Adjusters, LLC) Granted

“the Court grants summary judgment in favor of NCA and C & A on all counts and in favor of Coady’s on the FDCPA and ch. 93A claims.”

Motion for summary judgment on chapter 93a claim (145 Marston Street, Inc. and National Credit Adjusters, LLC) Granted
Request for punitive damages for stay violation (John W. Petralia) Denied

“The Court will not award Mr. Petralia punitive damages, however, because Coady’s conduct was not egregious for the reasons set forth above.”

In re Rogers
· 2018-04-23
Motion to dismiss stay damages contested matter as sanction (City of Framingham) Granted

“the Court hereby grants the Dismissal Motion”

Motion for damages for violation of automatic stay (Larry Francis Rogers) Denied

“the Court hereby grants the Dismissal Motion and denies the Debtor's Preliminary Motion for Contempt for Violation of Stay”

Baldiga v. Moog, Inc. (In re Comprehensive Power, Inc.)
· 2017-12-08
Motion to dismiss recharacterization count i (Moog, Inc.) Denied

“Moog’s Motion is granted in part as to Count II, which count is dismissed, and denied in part with respect to Counts I and III—XII.”

Motion to dismiss equitable subordination count ii (Moog, Inc.) Granted
Motion to dismiss actual fraudulent transfer count iii (Moog, Inc.) Denied
Motion to dismiss constructive fraudulent transfer count iv (Moog, Inc.) Denied
Motion to dismiss state actual fraudulent transfer count v (Moog, Inc.) Denied
Motion to dismiss state constructive fraudulent transfer count vi (Moog, Inc.) Denied
Motion to dismiss state insider transfer count vii (Moog, Inc.) Denied
Motion to dismiss section 550 recovery count viii (Moog, Inc.) Denied
Motion to dismiss state recovery count ix (Moog, Inc.) Denied
Motion to dismiss successor liability count x (Moog, Inc.) Denied
Motion to dismiss ucc article 9 count xi (Moog, Inc.) Denied
Motion to dismiss chapter 93a count xii (Moog, Inc.) Denied
In re Silk
· 2016-04-08
Motion for enforcement of automatic stay and sanctions (William Silk) Granted in part

“For the reasons discussed below, the Motion is granted in part”

Request for punitive damages for stay violation (William Silk) Denied

“The Court declines to award punitive damages”

Request for injunctive relief for stay violation (William Silk) Denied

“The Court declines to award punitive damages or enter injunc-tive relief”

Draft for Judge Panos with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Panos, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Panos's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace