Robert Rees Summerhays

“The court finds there are no genuine issues of material fact and Evanston is entitled to summary judgment. The court finds Evanston does not owe a duty to defend or indemnity Riceland in the Van Geffen litigation.”

“the Motion for Summary Judgment [doc. 13] filed by Reliance is GRANTED”

“the Amended Motion for Summary Judgment [doc. 19] filed by Plaintiff is DENIED.”

“Accordingly, Abshire’s Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 42] is DENIED.”

“For the reasons set forth above, the motion for summary judgment [ECF No. 48] filed by Defendant is DENIED.”

“IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT for the next 14 days, unless this Court acts to extend or shorten that period: Defendants, including DHS and all of its subdivisions, agencies, and employees, are hereby enjoined and restrained from implementing the Termination Order...”

“The Court has considered Plaintiff States' Motion to Extend Temporary Restraining Order, and IT IS HEREBY ORDERED granting the motion.”

“IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion for Limited Intervention [62], filed by Kevin Alexi De Leon De Leon, Alicia De Los Angeles Duran Raymundo, Innovation Law Lab. The motion was argued and is hereby DENIED.”

“IT IS ORDERED THAT the Plaintiff States' Motion for Preliminary Injunction [ECF No. 13] is GRANTED; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT Defendants...are hereby enjoined from enforcing the April 1, 2022 Order Under Sections 362 & 365 of the Public Health Service Act anywhere within the United States”

“IT IS ORDERED THAT the Expedited Motion to Stay Nationwide Scope of Preliminary Injunction Pending Appeal [ECF No. 97] filed by Alicia De Los Angles Duran Raymundo, Kevin Alexi De Leon and Innovation Law Lab is DENIED.”

“IT IS ORDERED THAT the above-captioned case is hereby DISMISSED AS MOOT.”

“In light of the foregoing, the Court GRANTS PLAINTIFFS' REQUEST FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF. The State of Louisiana is prohibited from using SB8's map of congressional districts for any election.”

“IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, consistent with the report and recommendation, the Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss (Rec. Doc. 53) filed by Mark Garber...Rusty Santiny...and Sara Orgeron...(‘LPSO Defendants’) is hereby GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Specifically, the Court grants LPSO Defendants' Motion in part, whereby all federal Constitutional claims against them are dismissed but denies LPSO Defendants' Motion in part, whereby all claims against them arising under state law shall proceed on the basis of supplemental jurisdiction.”