Nauman Steele Scott

How Judge Scott rules, drawn from 30 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Scott no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled here.

Court
United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana
Position
District judge
Status
Deceased
Served
1970–2001
Appointed by
Richard Nixon (Republican)
Commissioned
October 15, 1970
Education
Amherst College, B.A. (1938); Tulane University Law School, LL.B. (1941)
Signed orders read
30

About Judge Scott

Nauman Steele Scott was a judge of the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana. Appointed by President Richard M. Nixon, Judge Scott received a commission on October 15, 1970. Judge Scott assumed senior status on December 4, 1984 and served until death on September 19, 2001.

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Crain ex rel. National Labor Relations Board v. Fabsteel Co.
· 1977-02-23
Motion for injunction (labor board) Denied

“For the foregoing reasons, the NLRB’s request for an injunction pursuant to Section 10(j) of the Act is hereby DENIED.”

George & Anna Portes Cancer Prevention Center of Chicago, Inc. v. Inexco Oil Co.
· 1977-09-23
Motion to set aside default (defendant) Granted

“motion to set aside the entry of default is hereby GRANTED.”

Insurance Co. of North America v. United States Postal Service
· 1981-06-16
Motions to dismiss (Postal Service) Granted

“Accordingly, plaintiff’s complaint, insofar as it asserts a cause of action sounding in tort against the USPS, be and it is hereby dismissed.”

Johnny's Pizza House, Inc. v. G & H Properties, Inc.
· 1981-10-05
Motions to remand (plaintiff) Granted

“it is hereby ordered that plaintiff’s Motion to Remand is granted and that this action be and it is hereby remanded to the Fourth Judicial District Court, Parish of Ouachita, State of Louisiana.”

Motion to dismiss stay or transfer (defendant) Moot / procedural

“Inasmuch as we may not exercise removal jurisdiction, the motions filed by G&H are rendered moot.”

Blake v. United States
· 1982-01-25
Summary judgment (defendant United States) Granted

“Based upon the foregoing, defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is granted and plaintiff’s complaint is hereby dismissed.”

Bank of Winnfield & Trust Co. v. United States
· 1982-02-25
Summary judgment (plaintiff bank) Granted

“Motion for Summary Judgment on behalf of the plaintiff herein is hereby granted,”

Summary judgment (defendant United States) Denied

“the Motion for Summary Judgment on behalf of the defendant herein is hereby denied.”

Williams v. United States
· 1982-06-18
Motions to dismiss (government) Granted

“Plaintiff having failed to file a proper administrative claim within the two years provided by law, we grant the Government’s motion to dismiss and hereby dismiss plaintiff’s complaint at plaintiff’s cost.”

Holdiness v. Louisiana
· 1983-10-05
Motions to remand (plaintiff) Denied

“For the foregoing reasons, the plaintiff’s Motion to Remand is DENIED.”

Motions to dismiss (defendants) Granted

“the defendants’ Motion to Dismiss indicates that the plaintiff has failed to file any administrative claims with the United States Army Claims Service, the appropriate Federal agency, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2675(a). Accordingly, we presently have no jurisdiction over the plaintiff’s claim. For the foregoing reasons, the plaintiff’s Motion to Remand is DENIED. The defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is hereby GRANTED, and it is ORDERED that the action be DISMISSED without prejudice.”

Skinner v. Old Southern Life Ins. Co.
· 1983-10-11
Motions to remand (plaintiff) Denied

“For these reasons, plaintiff’s Motion to Remand is denied.”

Dove v. Fletcher
· 1983-11-09
Summary judgment (defendant sheriff) Granted

“Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED.”

Frazier v. Columbia Gas Development Corp.
· 1985-03-28

Scott reaffirmed an earlier indemnity ruling after subsequent authority and held that the contractor owed no defense or indemnity for the indemnitee's own negligence.

Baum v. Transworld Drilling Co.
· 1985-07-11

Scott calculated maintenance-and-cure offsets after a Jones Act jury trial; the opinion did not decide a party motion.

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Median case duration in the sampled dockets: 2278.5 days (N = 20).

The 20 located dockets are a sparse pre-electronic cohort and do not represent Scott's full caseload.

A historical record

Judge Scott no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled here. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.