David Cleveland Joseph

How Judge Joseph rules, drawn from 9 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana
Position
district
Appointed by
Donald Trump (Republican)
Commissioned
2020-07-31
Education
B.B.A., University of Oklahoma; J.D., Louisiana State University, Paul M. Hebert Law Center (Order of the Coif; Louisiana Law Review)
Signed orders read
9

How Judge Joseph decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

On administrative-exhaustion challenges to employment claims, reads the EEOC charge generously: an unraised theory survives dismissal if it 'grew out of' the facts in the charge. Plead the facts; the precise label matters less.

“The Court views administrative charges in the ‘broadest reasonable sense.’”

Procedural preferences

Polices subject-matter jurisdiction sua sponte and resolves it before the merits: even before ruling on a pending summary-judgment motion. The party invoking the court's jurisdiction bears the burden, and an inadequately pleaded basis (seaman/vessel status, navigable water, or diversity citizenship/amount) gets the case dismissed.

“Although not raised by the parties ... the Court deems it necessary to determine subject matter jurisdiction before considering the merits of the Motion.”

Heavy use of the magistrate-judge referral system (Perez-Montes in Alexandria): most habeas/prisoner/Social-Security matters reach him as an R&R he adopts on de novo review; he recites that he reviewed the objections before adopting.

“after a de novo review of the record, including the Defendant’s Objection ... having determined that the Magistrate Judge’s findings and recommendations are correct”

In the adopted Strebeck recommendation, a service defect that would functionally time-bar the claim did not automatically produce dismissal. The court extended Rule 4(m), allowed the correction of a misnamed insurer to relate back, and deferred Rule 12(b)(6) until service was perfected.

“Because dismissal with prejudice is an extreme sanction that deprives a litigant of the opportunity to pursue his claim, it is warranted only where a clear record of delay or contumacious conduct by the plaintiff exists, and a lesser sanction would not better serve the interests of justice.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Trevillion v. Concordia Bank & Trust Co.
1:20-cv-01059-DCJ-JPM · 2020-12-08
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Concordia’s Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 6] is DENIED.”

Griffin v. Specialized Environmental Services, Inc.
6:21-cv-00082-DCJ-DJA · 2023-02-09
Summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant’s MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [Doc. 42] is DENIED.”

Pineville Firefighters Local 1384 v. City of Pineville
1:20-cv-01111-DCJ-JPM · 2021-05-10
Motions to remand (plaintiff) Granted

“IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand [ECF No. 8] is GRANTED.”

Motion for attorney fees (plaintiff) Denied

“IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Plaintiffs’ Motion for Attorney’s Fees [ECF No. 8] is DENIED.”

Mohamed v. Frederick (Warden)
1:20-cv-01001-DCJ-JPM · 2020-09-09
Motion for tro (petitioner) Denied

“IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motion for Temporary Restraining Order enjoining Respondents from transferring him from LaSalle Correctional Center while his § 2241 Petition is pending is DENIED.”

Banks v. Barr (USA Attorney General)
1:20-cv-00990-DCJ-JPM · 2021-02-12
Habeas petition (petitioner) Denied

“IT IS ORDERED that the Plaintiff’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus [ECF No. 1] and the amended Petition [ECF No. 8] are DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction, WITH PREJUDICE, as to the jurisdictional issue, and WITHOUT PREJUDICE as to the merits of Banks’ claim.”

Hardwick v. Commissioner of Social Security
1:21-cv-00009-DCJ-JPM · 2023-01-06
Social security appeal (plaintiff) Denied

“IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the final decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED, and Hardwick’s appeal is DENIED AND DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.”

Strebeck v. American Modern Insurance Co.
5:23-cv-00147-DCJ-KDM · 2023-09-18
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Moot / procedural

“IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant’s MOTION TO DISMISS [Doc. 8] is DENIED.”

Butler v. Southwest Louisiana Healthcare System Inc.
2:23-cv-00048-DCJ-TPL · 2024-11-05
Voluntary dismissal (plaintiff) Moot / procedural

“ORDER granting 24 Voluntary Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge David C Joseph on 11/5/2024.”

Strebeck v. American Modern Insurance Co.
5:23-cv-00147-DCJ-KDM · 2025-03-25

Joseph adopted Magistrate Judge McClusky's unopposed R&R and dismissed the case sua sponte under Rule 41(b) after the plaintiff failed to obtain new counsel or state an intent to proceed pro se. The judgment says, 'IT IS ORDERED that this case is hereby DISMISSED. FED. R. CIV. P. 41(b).' The adopted R&R recommended dismissal without prejudice. Retained as a signed current disposition but excluded from motion statistics because no party motion was adjudicated.

Draft for Judge Joseph with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Joseph, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Joseph's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace