Shelly Deckert Dick
Motion outcomes
Counted from classified signed orders only. Percentages are shown only where the sample is large enough to be meaningful; smaller samples are reported as raw counts.
| Summary judgment N = 6 |
Granted: 4Granted in part: 1Denied: 1 | counts only |
| Motions to dismiss N = 3 |
Granted: 1Moot / procedural: 2 | counts only |
| Voluntary dismissal N = 2 |
Moot / procedural: 2 | counts only |
| Motion to certify interlocutory appeal N = 1 |
Denied: 1 | counts only |
| Motion for leave to amend N = 1 |
Granted: 1 | counts only |
| Motion for hearing N = 1 |
Denied: 1 | counts only |
| Motion to recuse N = 1 |
Denied: 1 | counts only |
| Motion for reconsideration N = 1 |
Denied: 1 | counts only |
| Motion for relief from judgment N = 1 |
Granted: 1 | counts only |
| Social security appeal N = 1 |
Denied: 1 | counts only |
A "1 of 1" is one ruling, not a tendency. Treat small samples as illustrative, not predictive.
Signed rulings
A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.
“ACCORDINGLY, the Defendant's Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss (Rec. Doc. 8) is hereby GRANTED, and the claims of Plaintiff against Lofton are hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.”
“IT IS FURTHER ORDER Plaintiff's Motion for Hearing (Rec. Doc. 12) is hereby DENIED.”
“ACCORDINGLY, Plaintiff's Motion for Leave (Rec. Doc. 13) is hereby GRANTED. Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (Rec. Doc. 16) has already been filed in the record by the Clerk of Court and will now serve as the operative pleading.”
“IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' initial Motion to Dismiss (Rec. Doc. 4) is hereby DENIED AS MOOT.”
“ACCORDINGLY, the Motion shall be treated as a Motion to Dismiss (Rec. Doc. 15) voluntarily, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2), and the Court hereby issues an Order of Dismissal without prejudice.”
“Plaintiffs' Motion to Recuse Chief Judge Shelly Dick, Magistrate Judge Scott Johnson, Magistrate Judge John W. DeGravelles, Magistrate Judge Erin Winder-Doomes and All Remaining Magistrate and District Judges Within the United States of America Federal Middle District ... are DENIED.”
“Plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration and Nullification of Chief Judge December 11, 2024, Remand Order ... are DENIED.”
“Accordingly, the Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is hereby GRANTED. The Plaintiff shall submit a proposed Order in conformance with the Court's Ruling.”
“ACCORDINGLY, the Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's claim and this matter is dismissed with prejudice.”
“ACCORDINGLY, the Motion for Summary Judgment is hereby GRANTED and Plaintiff's claims against Tracy Falgout and Randy Lavespere are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.”
“ACCORDINGLY, the Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is hereby granted in part, and the Plaintiff's claims against Defendant, Joseph McKneely, are hereby dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that in all other regards the Motion (Rec. Doc. 16) is hereby denied, and this matter is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings.”
“For foregoing reasons, the Motion to Certify Interlocutory Order for Appeal filed by Murphy Oil, USA, Inc. is DENIED.”
“Plaintiffs’ Motion for Expedited Consideration (Rec. Doc. 336) and Motion for Relief from Judgment Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6) (Rec. Doc. 318) are hereby GRANTED. This Court’s March 31, 2022 Judgment, which dismissed this matter without prejudice, is hereby VACATED.”
“IT IS ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion, as a Motion for Summary Judgment, is DENIED.”
“IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants Motion to Dismiss is denied, without prejudice, as moot.”
“Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that LCI’s Motion13 is GRANTED.”