John Wheadon deGravelles

“IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (R. Doc. 183) be denied and that the Motion for Summary Judgment of Defendant Linda Ottesen (R. Doc. 154) be granted, dismissing Plaintiff's claims asserted against Defendant Ottesen, with prejudice, and that this action be dismissed.”

“the Motion for Summary Judgment of Defendant Linda Ottesen (R. Doc. 154) be granted, dismissing Plaintiff's claims asserted against Defendant Ottesen, with prejudice, and that this action be dismissed.”

“This matter is before the court on Defendant Anthony Aguillard's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 50). The motion is not opposed. The Court has carefully reviewed the motion and attached memorandum and finds it to be meritorious. For reasons articulated in Defendants' motion and memorandum, the motion is granted and Plaintiff's claim against Anthony Aguillard is dismissed with prejudice.”

“IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc.26) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's claims against Defendants, Schneider National Carriers, Inc. and Old Republic Insurance Company, are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, at Plaintiff's cost.”

“IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 17) is DENIED, the decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED, and Plaintiff's appeal is DISMISSED with prejudice.”

“IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 92) is GRANTED. The parties conceded that Plaintiffs were each able to show a prima facie case of discrimination, but Defendant presented a legitimate non-discriminatory reason for not promoting each of the Plaintiffs, and Plaintiffs were each unable to carry their summary judgment burden to show pretext. ... As a result, Plaintiffs' claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.”

“IT IS ORDERED that the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 15) is granted, in part dismissing the plaintiff's claims for violations of prison rules and compensatory damages. The Court declines the exercise of supplemental jurisdiction in connection with Plaintiff's potential state law claims.”

“IT IS ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 78) is GRANTED, in part, and that the plaintiff's claims against defendant Arnold are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in all other regards, the Motion (Doc. 78) is DENIED and that this matter is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings herein.”

“IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 19) is granted, dismissing all of Plaintiff’s claims against all Defendants. ... this action shall be dismissed with prejudice.”

“IT IS ORDERED that the defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 61) is granted, dismissing the plaintiff’s claims against defendant Victor J. Woods, Jr. with prejudice.”

“IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 37) is GRANTED, dismissing this action as to Independent Specialty Insurance and Lloyd’s, and furthermore that the entire consolidated action is DISMISSED without prejudice.”

“IT IS ORDERED that Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss under Rule 12(b)(5) and 2(b)(6) (Doc. 16, 17) are GRANTED, and Plaintiff’s federal claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over any state law claims and that those claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.”

“IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, Motion to Strike, and Motion for Attorney’s Fees (Doc. 19) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, and that Plaintiff’s federal claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, and Plaintiff’s state law claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.”