John Victor Parker

U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana district Retired 2014 · served 1979–2014 Appointed by Jimmy Carter (Democratic) 25 signed orders read

Judge Parker no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

How Judge Parker decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

In toxic-tort and products cases the court requires competent expert proof of exposure, causation, and injury, and excludes causation opinions that rest on no peer-reviewed epidemiology showing a statistically significant link.

“the motion in limine submitted on behalf of Exxon (Doc. 60), regarding Drs. Brautbar, Dicke, and Infante, and Frank Parker and Vernon Rose is hereby GRANTED and the testimony of those witnesses will be excluded at trial”

The court reads insurance policies and indemnity agreements by their terms, construing genuine ambiguities against the insurer while enforcing clear exclusions to defeat coverage.

“The motion for summary judgment (doc. 17) filed by defendant, Continental Casualty Company is hereby GRANTED and this action shall be dismissed”

Procedural preferences

On removal the court guards its jurisdiction: it remands where the well-pleaded complaint raises only state-law claims, and treats the thirty-day removal clock strictly.

“the motion by plaintiff, Anieta Matthews, to remand (Doc. 6) is hereby GRANTED, and this matter will be remanded to the 19th Judicial District Court for the Parish of East Baton Rouge, State of Louisiana”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Dunn v. Nextel South Corp.
· 2002-01-08
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“The motion to dismiss on behalf of defendant (doc. 5) is hereby GRANTED and this action shall be dismissed WITHOUT PREJUDICE.”

Albritton v. ABC Corp.
· 2006-08-25
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Moot / procedural

“the court cannot rule on the motion to dismiss (doc. 5), and this action must be remanded to state court.”

Byrd v. St. Helena Parish Police Jury
· 2001-10-22
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“the Motion to Dismiss (doc. 13) filed by the defendant is hereby DENIED.”

Dixie Tobacco & Candy Co. v. Bridges
· 2003-01-17
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“the motion to dismiss by defendant, Cynthia Bridges, Secretary of the Louisiana Department of Revenue (doc. 12), is hereby GRANTED.”

United States v. Gremillion-Stovall
· 2005-10-17
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“the motion to dismiss (doc. 12) filed by the defendant, Mary E. Gremillion-Stovall, is hereby GRANTED, and that portion of the indictment containing allegations concerning conduct that occurred before April 14, 2000, is hereby dismissed.”

United States v. Sayes
· 1999-05-19
Motion for leave to dismiss indictment (government) Granted

“the motion by the government (doc. no. 89) to dismiss the indictment without prejudice as to Count 2 and Count 3 as to defendant Patrick Sayes only is hereby GRANTED.”

Johnson Bros. Corp. v. International Brotherhood of Painters
· 1994-07-27
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“the motion by defendant to dismiss is hereby GRANTED and this action shall be dismissed without prejudice.”

Hinson v. Mentor Corp.
· 2002-06-07
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“GRANTED and judgment shall be entered in favor of defendant”

Guidry v. Zale Corp.
· 1997-07-15
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“the motion by defendants is hereby GRANTED and this action will be dismissed”

McKenzie v. E.A. Uffman & Associates, Inc.
· 1996-07-30
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“the motion by plaintiff for summary judgment is hereby DENIED”

Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“the motion by plaintiff for summary judgment is hereby DENIED and the defendant for summary judgment is hereby GRANTED and this action will be dismissed”

Stevenson v. Williamson
· 2008-04-09
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“the motion by defendants, Anne Williamson and the State of Louisiana, through the Department of Social Services (doc. 17) is hereby GRANTED and judgment shall be entered in favor of defendants, dismissing this action with prejudice”

Cummins v. Unumprovident Insurance
· 2007-11-15
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“the cross motion for final judgment on the merits of the case by defendant, Unum Life Insurance Company (doc. 72) is hereby GRANTED”

Summary judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“the motion for summary judgment on the merits by plaintiff (76), Charles David Cummins, is hereby DENIED”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

The retrievable senior-status docket is dominated by miscellaneous federal enforcement and collection proceedings brought by the SEC, FTC, and the United States, with only isolated civil filings. His active-era docket, reflected in the published opinions, ran to employment, insurance-coverage, ERISA, toxic-tort/products, and removal/remand litigation.

A historical record

Judge Parker no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.