Erin Wilder-Doomes

“IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that the Motion for Preliminary Injunction be DENIED.”

“IT IS RECOMMENDED that the Motion to Dismiss by the United States of America, be GRANTED IN PART and that all claims of Plaintiff Kelvin Wells in this case be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to timely effect service of process.”

“the second Motion for Leave to Amend27 be GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, allowing only amendment of the claims related to Gooden ... and Plaintiff’s remaining claims against Tim Hooper be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.”

“IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that the Motion to Dismiss,29 filed by Defendant Tim Hooper, be DENIED AS MOOT.”

“IT IS RECOMMENDED that the United States’ Motion to Dismiss for Insufficient Service of Process and Lack of Personal Jurisdiction12 be DENIED at this time to permit Plaintiff Brandon Powell, Sr.”

“IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that the Ex Parte Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Notice of Removal,79 filed by Defendant Amazon.com Services, LLC and ALM Baton Rouge, LLC, be GRANTED, and that the Clerk of Court be directed to docket the Second Amended Notice of Removal into the record of this matter, which will become the operative Amended Notice of Removal.”

“IT IS RECOMMENDED that the Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction over the Subject Matter,28 filed by Home Bank, N.A.; Stephen Damore; Newman, Mathis, Brady & Spedale, PLC; Clay LeGros; Jeffery Toepfer, and Mayne Maiorana, be GRANTED and this case be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.”

“It is recommended that Defendants= Motion for Summary Judgment (R. Doc. 11) be granted, dismissing Plaintiff’s claims asserted against Defendants for failure to exhaust administrative remedies pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997(e), and that this action be dismissed, without prejudice, but with prejudice to re-assertion of the same claim or claims in forma pauperis.”

“IT IS RECOMMENDED that the Motions for Summary Judgment, 34 filed by Amanda Cowan and Jamie Cashio, be GRANTED.”

“IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment 35 be DENIED.”

“For the reasons set forth herein, the undersigned RECOMMENDS that the Motion to Dismiss be GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.”

“IT IS RECOMMENDED that the Motion to Dismiss 70 filed by Scott and EBRPP be GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, dismissing all claims against EBRPP with prejudice; dismissing with prejudice the claims for injunctive relief against Scott in both his individual and official capacities; and dismissing the claims for monetary damages against Scott only in his official capacity.”

“IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that the Motion to Dismiss 71 filed by Brown be GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, dismissing with prejudice the claims for injunctive relief against Brown in her individual and official capacities.”

“IT IS RECOMMENDED that the Motion for Summary Judgment filed on behalf of James LeBlanc, Darryl Vannoy, Timothy Delaney, Joseph Lamartiniere, and Jerry Hancock be GRANTED as a matter of law and that all claims against these defendants be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.”

“IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that, if this Report and Recommendation is adopted, the Motion to Dismiss, 45 filed by Mayor Sharon Weston Broome, which was referred to the undersigned, be DENIED AS MOOT.”