Michael A. Crawford

How Judge Crawford rules, drawn from 14 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Louisiana
Position
bankruptcy
Commissioned
2022-10-03
Education
Louisiana State University, undergraduate degree in business/finance, 1984; Louisiana Tech University, M.B.A., 1988; Louisiana State University Paul M. Hebert Law Center, J.D., 1993
Signed orders read
14

How Judge Crawford decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

A preliminary-injunction movant must establish every required element; proof of only one factor did not justify stopping an arbitration that could efficiently liquidate a bankruptcy claim.

“At best Ferrandino has satisfied one of the four elements necessary to obtain a preliminary injunction.”

Procedural preferences

At summary judgment, the court rejected new conspiracy and recourse theories that were absent from the complaint after discovery had closed.

“Thomas may not expand the pleadings in an attempt to recover funds for conspiracy or to make out some kind of claim pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1111(b)(1)(A)”

Cautions

In a contested compensation application, extensive block billing contributed to an award below the amount requested even though the court allowed more than the former customary amount.

“For these reasons, Mr. Hoke’s application, as supplemented and amended on March 24, 2023, is approved over the objection and the amended objection of the Trustee, but only for a fee of $3,480”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Alabama Highway Bridgeport, LLC v. LVS II SPE I LLC
21-01007 (20-10824 and related cases) · 2023-09-08
Claim to invalidate mortgage modifications after trial (Alabama Highway Bridgeport, LLC and related debtor-plaintiffs) Denied

“Accordingly, the court finds in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiffs on all counts.”

Stutsman Construction, LLC v. Ross Shaun Adair
22-01009 (22-10249) · 2023-07-14
Nondischargeability claim after trial (Stutsman Construction, LLC) Granted

“Accordingly, the debt evidenced by the Judgment is deemed nondischargeable under section 523(a)(6) of the Bankruptcy Code on account of Stutsman’s willful and malicious injury suffered at the hands of Shaun.”

In re Randolph Scott
22-10355 · 2023-04-05
Application for compensation (Robert W. Hoke) Granted in part

“For these reasons, Mr. Hoke’s application, as supplemented and amended on March 24, 2023, is approved over the objection and the amended objection of the Trustee, but only for a fee of $3,480”

Sherry Foster v. Capital City Credit, Inc.
23-01002 (22-10665) · 2023-06-30
Summary judgment (Richard D. Bankston) Denied

“After hearing argument of counsel on summary judgment, and for the reasons orally rendered, the court denied summary judgment”

Request for sanctions (Sherry Foster) Denied

“much less in a willful manner warranting sanctions. Therefore, Debtor is not entitled to an award of actual damages (she has none) or discretionary punitive damages.”

Request for turnover (Sherry Foster) Moot / procedural

“At the time of trial, however, the Debtor had already received the post-petition funds and therefore turnover as a remedy has been rendered moot.”

Ferrandino & Son, Inc. v. WMG Development, LLC
23-01003 (23-10096) · 2023-04-19
Preliminary injunction (Ferrandino & Son, Inc.) Denied

“Accordingly, the Motion for Preliminary Injunction is denied.”

Gabriel Rincon and Angela Rincon v. Kasey Hicks
23-01014 (23-10289) · 2024-09-09
Objection to proof of claim (Kasey Hicks) Granted in part

“Therefore, Mr. Hicks’ objection to their claim will be sustained in the amount of $74,065.45.”

Nondischargeability claim after trial (Gabriel Rincon and Angela Rincon) Granted

“Therefore, the Rincons are entitled to a money judgment of $70,184.51. Finally, because this award of money damages emanates from Mr. Hicks’ actual fraud, it is deemed nondischargeable pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A).”

Jackson Smith Thomas v. Kologik, LLC
24-01019 (24-10311) · 2025-03-28
Summary judgment (Mississippi River Bank and Merchants & Marine Bancorp, Inc.) Granted

“The court finds that competent summary judgment evidence demonstrates that there are no genuine issues of material fact with respect to the Banks’ Motion, and MRB and MMB are entitled to judgment as a matter of law without the need for a trial.”

Jackson Smith Thomas v. Kologik, LLC
24-01019 (24-10311) · 2025-04-03
Motion for partial summary judgment (Jackson Smith Thomas) Denied

“Thomas’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is denied in its entirety.”

Motion for partial summary judgment (Kologik, LLC) Granted in part

“Kologik’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is granted in part and denied in part.”

Motion in limine (Kologik, LLC) Granted in part

“To the extent not mooted by the rulings herein, the Motion in Limine is granted.”

Beeland Properties, LLC v. TDP Group, LLC
24-01030 (24-10461) · 2025-07-17
Motion to quash garnishment (United States) Granted

“Accordingly, the United States’ Motion to Quash is granted.”

Tower Credit, Inc. v. Carla R. Smith
24-01037 (24-10786) · 2025-05-30
Summary judgment (Carla R. Smith) Denied

“Ms. Smith’s Motion to Dismiss is being treated as one seeking summary judgment because she expanded the pleadings with several affidavits. The motion is denied, however, because there are numerous contested issues of material fact”

Motion for partial summary judgment (Tower Credit, Inc.) Granted in part

“Tower’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is granted in part and denied in part.”

Tower Credit, Inc. v. Carla R. Smith
24-01037 (24-10786) · 2025-09-12
Nondischargeability claim after trial (Tower Credit, Inc.) Denied

“The court finds in favor of Ms. Smith and against Tower. Ms. Smith’s debt to Tower is a dischargeable debt in her bankruptcy case.”

In re Brittany DeShea Mackie
25-10768 · 2026-04-13
Motion to dismiss case (United States Trustee) Granted

“For these reasons, this case is dismissed for the Debtor’s failure to rebut the presumption of abuse under section 707(b)(2) of the Bankruptcy Code.”

Request for refiling bar (United States Trustee) Denied

“However, the dismissal will not be accompanied by a discretionary bar to refiling under section 349 of the Bankruptcy Code.”

Draft for Judge Crawford with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Crawford, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Crawford's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace