Patrick Eugene Carr

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana district Appointed by Jimmy Carter (Democratic) 21 signed orders read

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

United States v. Morvant
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“for the reasons that follow, now DENIES the motions.”

Motions to strike (defendant) Denied
In re Stouder
Bankruptcy appeal (appellant) Granted in part

“IT IS ORDERED that the Bankruptcy Court’s order be and is hereby AFFIRMED to the extent that it recognizes claimant Michael Barbot’s claim as a valid community claim against the bankruptcy estate, and MODIFIED to the extent that the amount of the claim is increased to $12,156.99.”

Harrison v. Garber Bros., Inc.
Motion in limine (plaintiff) Denied

“For the following reasons, the Court DENIES the motion.”

Durham, Inc. v. Vanguard Bank & Trust Co.
Motion for reconsideration (defendant) Granted

“Vanguard’s motion for reconsideration by GRANTED to the extent that the Court’s Minute Entry dated May 18, 1994, be and is hereby VACATED”

Motion to dismiss or for summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“Vanguard’s motion to dismiss or for summary judgment be and is hereby DENIED.”

United States v. Conway
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Granted

“the government’s motion for summary judgment will be granted and the defendant’s motion will be denied.”

Summary judgment (defendant) Denied
Washington v. Winn-Dixie of Louisiana, Inc.
Summary judgment (defendants) Granted

“For the following reasons, the Court now GRANTS the motion.”

Smith v. Associates Commercial Corp. (In re Clark Pipe & Supply Co.)
Bankruptcy appeal (appellant) Denied

“Accordingly, the decision of the Bankruptcy Court is AFFIRMED.”

Johnson v. Odeco Oil & Gas Co., Inc.
Motions to remand (plaintiff) Denied

“the Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand is denied and the Defendant’s Motions for Summary Judgment are granted.”

Summary judgment (defendants) Granted
Taylor v. Getty Oil Co.
Summary judgment (defendants) Granted

“IT IS ORDERED that the Motion of Elf-Aquitaine, Inc. and Inter-North, Inc. for Summary Judgment be and the same is hereby granted, dismissing plaintiffs’ suit against them with prejudice and with costs.”

Prejean v. Ochsner Clinic
Motion for supplemental attorneys fees (plaintiff) Granted

“Plaintiffs application for a supplemental award of attorneys’ fees and expenses in connection with his original application is granted and has been incorporated into the award discussed herein.”

Bach v. Trident Shipping Co., Inc.
Motion for partial summary judgment (defendants) Granted

“At the hearing, the Court GRANTED the motion; the Court now gives written reasons for its ruling.”

Angelina Casualty Co. v. Exxon Corp., USA, Inc.
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“At the hearing, the Court GRANTED the motion; the Court now gives written reasons for its ruling.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

The reviewed decisions span maritime law, employment discrimination, bankruptcy appeals, insurance, constitutional litigation, banking, and federal administrative law; no structured nature-of-suit enumeration was available for this closed historical docket.

Put Judge Carr's record to work

Ezel drafts and answers grounded in this exact profile: how Judge Carr actually rules, not a generic AI guess.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer is grounded in Judge Carr's own signed orders and cites them.