Janis van Meerveld

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana magistrate 15 signed orders read

How Judge Meerveld decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Procedural preferences

On unopposed EAJA and lodestar fee motions, recommends granting a reasonable fee, applying a cost-of-living adjustment above the statutory cap where justified.

“it is RECOMMENDED that the plaintiff's motion for attorney's fees be GRANTED and that plaintiff be awarded $4077.50 in reasonable attorney's fees.”

Enforces expert-disclosure scheduling deadlines under the harmlessness factors, excluding a late expert whose delay is unexplained while admitting another subject to a monetary sanction.

“Because plaintiff has failed to establish good cause for her delay as to the Randle report, IT IS ORDERED that the Supplemental and Amending Motion in Limine to Exclude Expert Testimony of Randle (Rec. Doc. 104) is GRANTED. Randle will not be allowed to present expert testimony at trial.”

Cautions

On a Rule 12(b)(6) qualified-immunity motion in prisoner cases, recommends allowing a claim against an individual defendant to proceed while dismissing the remaining claims with prejudice.

“Magistrate Judge van Meerveld recommended that the Court deny defendants' motion to dismiss as to plaintiff's claim against EMT Jacob in his individual capacity, and grant the remainder of defendants' motion, dismissing the remaining claims against defendants with prejudice. ... The Court adopts Magistrate Judge van Meerveld's R&R as its opinion.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Olive v. Berryhill (Acting Commissioner of Social Security)
2:16-cv-00559-KDE-JVM · 2017-08-18
Attorney fees (plaintiff) Granted

“it is RECOMMENDED that the plaintiff's motion for attorney's fees be GRANTED and that plaintiff be awarded $4077.50 in reasonable attorney's fees.”

Todd v. Terrebonne Parish Consolidated Government, et al.
2:21-cv-00550-JVM · 2021-12-08
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted in part

“Magistrate Judge van Meerveld recommended that the Court deny defendants' motion to dismiss as to plaintiff's claim against EMT Jacob in his individual capacity, and grant the remainder of defendants' motion, dismissing the remaining claims against defendants with prejudice. ... The Court adopts Magistrate Judge van Meerveld's R&R as its opinion.”

Oil States International, Inc. v. Richard
2:22-cv-02437-SSV-JVM · 2023-07-06
Attorney fees (plaintiff) Granted

“it is RECOMMENDED that the Motion be GRANTED and that the Court award plaintiff its reasonable attorneys' fees and costs in the amount of $17,107.”

Jefferson v. Barriere Construction Co., L.L.C., et al.
2:22-cv-02050-DJP-JVM · 2024-12-03
Motion in limine (defendant) Granted

“Because plaintiff has failed to establish good cause for her delay as to the Randle report, IT IS ORDERED that the Supplemental and Amending Motion in Limine to Exclude Expert Testimony of Randle (Rec. Doc. 104) is GRANTED. Randle will not be allowed to present expert testimony at trial.”

Motion in limine (defendant) Denied

“Because the importance of the Dietze testimony outweighs the prejudice and Ms. Jefferson's failure to explain her delay, the Motion in Limine to Limit and Exclude Expert Testimony of Dr. Dietze (Rec. Doc. 101) is DENIED; however, as a sanction for the delay ... Ms. Jefferson's counsel shall pay Barriere's reasonable attorneys' fees of $7,500 within 30 days.”

King v. Slidell City, et al.
2:25-cv-00785-SSV-JVM · 2025-09-02

Her R&R (2025-07-23, R. Doc. 10) is supported by DJ Vance's adoption order (2025-09-02). Pro se IFP state-prisoner sec1983 reviewed under 1915/Spears screening; recommended DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE as frivolous and for failure to state a claim. Objection overruled, ADOPTED (federal claims w/prej; state-law claims dismissed w/o prejudice). This screening dismissal did not resolve a party motion.

O'Connor v. Allied Trust Insurance Company
2:23-cv-00218 · 2025-09-08
Motions to compel (defendant) Granted in part

“Motions to Compel are hereby GRANTED in part and DENIED in part”

Jack v. Progressive Insurance Company
2:25-cv-00845 · 2025-11-12
Motions to remand (plaintiff) Denied

“Motion to Remand (Rec. Doc. 9) be DENIED”

Ohio Casualty Insurance Co. v. Ryder & Ryder, Ltd.
2:25-cv-00424 · 2026-03-30
Motion for sanctions (plaintiff) Granted in part

“a partial award of attorneys' fees is appropriate”

Moll v. Aziyo Biologics, Inc.
2:23-cv-06790 · 2026-03-17
Motion for sanctions (plaintiff) Granted in part

“GRANTED in part and DENIED in part”

DeFrancesch v. Slim Wellness Studio, LLC
2:25-cv-02299 · 2026-04-02
Motion for leave to amend (plaintiff) Granted

“Motion for Leave to File First Amended and Supplemental Complaint (Rec. Doc. 20) is GRANTED”

Cacho v. Gusman
2:11-cv-00225 · 2026-02-18
Motion to terminate consent decree (movant) Moot / procedural

“The Motion to Terminate or Dissolve the Consent Decree (Rec. Doc. 157) is taken under submission pending the resolution of the preceding questions”

Nasio v. FBS Markets Inc.
2:25-cv-01936 · 2026-01-28

Sua sponte screening recommendation of dismissal without prejudice for improper venue and lack of personal jurisdiction after a show-cause order (no party motion).

Put Judge Meerveld's record to work

Ezel drafts and answers grounded in this exact profile: how Judge Meerveld actually rules, not a generic AI guess.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer is grounded in Judge Meerveld's own signed orders and cites them.