Barry W. Ashe

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana district Appointed by Donald Trump (Republican) 19 signed orders read

How Judge Ashe decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

He denies a merchant summary judgment under La. R.S. 9:2800.6 where the plaintiff shows the merchant itself created the hazardous condition (Deshotel), which supplies the statutory notice element.

“IT IS ORDERED that Walmart's motion for summary judgment (R. Doc. 20) is DENIED.”

Procedural preferences

In TVPRA sex-trafficking suits against hotel franchisors he applies the Eleventh Circuit's Red Roof Inns beneficiary framework and dismisses where the franchisor's knowledge of and participation in the venture is not adequately pleaded.

“IT IS ORDERED that Choice's Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss the TVPRA beneficiary claim in Plaintiff's first amended complaint is GRANTED, and that claim is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.”

Cautions

In Louisiana merchant-liability trip-and-fall cases (La. R.S. 9:2800.6) he grants the merchant summary judgment where the hazard was open and obvious and the video record shows the plaintiff was inattentive.

“IT IS ORDERED that Jazz Casino's motion for summary judgment (R. Doc. 68) is GRANTED, and Plaintiffs' claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as to all named defendants.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Romano v. Jazz Casino Company, LLC
2:20-cv-00228-BWA-DMD · 2021-08-12
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“IT IS ORDERED that Jazz Casino's motion for summary judgment (R. Doc. 68) is GRANTED, and Plaintiffs' claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as to all named defendants.”

Motion in limine (defendant) Moot / procedural

“defendants' motion to exclude from trial or limit the testimony of Cheryl's treating physicians (R. Doc. 69) is DISMISSED as moot.”

Gabriel v. American Security Insurance Company
2:23-cv-01333-BWA-MBN · 2023-08-17
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“IT IS ORDERED that American Security's motion for summary judgment (R. Doc. 7) is GRANTED, and plaintiffs' claims against it are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.”

Smith v. BP Exploration & Production Inc.
2:17-cv-04551-BWA-KWR · 2022-08-19
Daubert (defendant) Granted

“IT IS ORDERED that Defendants' Daubert motion to exclude Cook (R. Doc. 47) is GRANTED.”

Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' motion for summary judgment (R. Doc. 48) is GRANTED, and Smith's claims against them are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.”

Morgan v. Ford Motor Company
2:21-cv-02408-BWA-JVM · 2023-06-22
Summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“IT IS ORDERED that Ford's motion for summary judgment (R. Doc. 20) is DENIED.”

Hernandez v. Walmart Inc.
2:23-cv-00210-BWA-MBN · 2023-08-23
Summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“IT IS ORDERED that Walmart's motion for summary judgment (R. Doc. 20) is DENIED.”

Doe (P.T.L.) v. Choice Hotels International, Inc.
2:25-cv-01812-BWA-DPC · 2026-01-22
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“IT IS ORDERED that Choice's Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss the TVPRA beneficiary claim in Plaintiff's first amended complaint is GRANTED, and that claim is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.”

Calogero v. Shows, Cali & Walsh, LLP
2:18-cv-06709-BWA-EJD · 2022-02-09
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“IT IS ORDERED that Defendant's motion to dismiss (R. Doc. 147) is DENIED.”

Sorbello v. AGCO Corporation
2:24-cv-00398-BWA-MBN · 2024-06-13
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“IT IS ORDERED that Kearney-National's motion to dismiss (R. Doc. 205) is DENIED without prejudice to its refiling a motion for summary judgment and/or Rule 12(b)(2) motion after appropriate discovery has been conducted.”

Washington-Nash v. United Services Automobile Association
2:23-cv-04942-BWA-MBN · 2024-02-16
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“IT IS ORDERED that USAA's motion to dismiss is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all claims of Plaintiff against USAA are dismissed WITHOUT PREJUDICE.”

IY v. Bogalusa City District Schools
2:24-cv-01407-BWA-MBN · 2024-10-03
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“IT IS ORDERED that Defendants' Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss (R. Doc. 24) is GRANTED, and plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.”

Jones v. St. Augustine High School, Inc.
2:20-cv-01452-BWA-KWR · 2020-08-06
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“IT IS ORDERED that Defendants' motion to dismiss (R. Doc. 16) is GRANTED, and this matter is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.”

United States v. Paige
2:25-cv-02040-BWA-KWR · 2026-02-02
Motion for temporary restraining order (plaintiff) Granted in part

“IT IS ORDERED that the government's motion for a temporary restraining order (R. Doc. 49) is GRANTED in part and DEFERRED in part.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Median motion-to-ruling time: 29 days (N = 3).

From the enumerated 2021-2023 cases: dominated by Hurricane Ida first-party insurance diversity suits (Allied Trust, Zurich, QBE, Chubb, Ocean Harbor, Transportation Ins.), plus personal-injury diversity (slip-and-fall vs Walmart) and marine personal-injury (Jones Act vs Weeks Marine). NOS examples captured: 110 Insurance, 360 P.I.: Other, Marine.

Put Judge Ashe's record to work

Ezel drafts and answers grounded in this exact profile: how Judge Ashe actually rules, not a generic AI guess.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer is grounded in Judge Ashe's own signed orders and cites them.