Danny C. Reeves

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky district Appointed by George W. Bush (Republican) 9 signed orders read

How Judge Reeves decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

After Bruen, will sustain 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(1) (felon-in-possession) as applied to defendants with serious, recent drug-trafficking felonies -- the historical tradition of disarming dangerous persons supplies a 'relevantly similar' analogue; no historical twin required.

“the government has met its burden by showing, through identification of historical laws, that disarming Atkins under the circumstances alleged is consistent with the Nation's historical tradition of firearm regulation.”

On major administrative-law challenges, applies a textualist reading (Title IX 'sex' = biological male/female), scrutinizes agency rulemaking hard under the APA (reasoned-explanation / response-to-comments), and treats compelled-pronoun mandates as serious 1st-Amendment compelled-speech/viewpoint-discrimination problems -- a combination that favors States seeking to enjoin federal rules.

“the Department's actions with respect to this rulemaking are arbitrary and capricious. The Department fails to provide a reasoned explanation for departing from its longstanding interpretations regarding the meaning of sex ... A rule that compels speech and engages in such viewpoint discrimination is impermissible.”

Cautions

Skeletal, undeveloped, or unsupported arguments are treated as waived; Reeves will not research and construct a party's argument for them. Brief each point with authority and record support.

“skeletal and unsupported arguments are subject to waiver. ... it is not a judge's responsibility to research and construct the parties' arguments, and putting this onus on the court is a risky business.”

A pro se party's failure to respond to a dispositive motion does NOT auto-grant it -- Reeves still tests the movant's Rule 56(a)/12 burden on the merits, and will deny as to claims that survive.

“Williams, proceeding pro se, did not respond to the present motion ... Notwithstanding that failure, the undersigned has examined the motion and concludes that the defendant has met its burden ... The defendant, however, has failed to meet it[s burden as to wrongful termination]”

Motion outcomes

Counted from classified signed orders only. Percentages are shown only where the sample is large enough to be meaningful; smaller samples are reported as raw counts.

Motions to dismiss
N = 4
Granted: 2Denied: 2 counts only
Summary judgment
N = 4
Granted: 2Granted in part: 2 counts only
Motion to amend
N = 1
Denied: 1 counts only
Preliminary injunction
N = 1
Granted: 1 counts only

A "1 of 1" is one ruling, not a tendency. Treat small samples as illustrative, not predictive.

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Williams v. Eastern Kentucky University
5:24-cv-00019-DCR-MAS
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“ORDERED that Defendant Eastern Kentucky University's partial motion to dismiss [Record No. 9] is GRANTED.”

O'Boyle v. Madison County, Kentucky
5:23-cv-00061-DCR
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“ORDERED that the defendants' motion for summary judgment [Record No. 48] is GRANTED. All remaining claims against Defendants Deanna Anglin, Austin Pingleton, and Michael Pingleton are DISMISSED, with prejudice.”

Jones v. Kenton County, Kentucky (Estate of John Daulton)
2:23-cv-00164-DCR-CJS
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted in part

“ORDERED that the defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [Record No. 46] is GRANTED, in part, and DENIED, in part, consistent with this Memorandum Opinion and Order. Plaintiff Tonya Jones' 'Failure to Train or Supervise' Deliberate Indifference Monell Claim against Kenton County in Count III will survive summary judgment. Jones' claims in Counts I, II, IV, V, and VI are dismissed.”

Kitchens v. National Board of Medical Examiners
5:24-cv-00151-DCR
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“Defendants National Board of Medical Examiners, Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates, and the Federation of State Medical Boards' motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim [Records No. 16, 21, and 28] is GRANTED.”

Motion to amend (plaintiff) Denied

“The plaintiff's motion for leave to file an Amended Complaint [Record No. 35] is DENIED.”

Williams v. Eastern Kentucky University
5:24-cv-00019-DCR-MAS
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted in part

“Defendant Eastern Kentucky University's Motion for Summary Judgment [Record No. 43] is DENIED with respect to Plaintiff Williams' claim of wrongful termination. The motion [Record No. 43] is GRANTED with respect to Plaintiff Williams claims of failure to hire, failure to promote, unequal term of employment, retaliation, and hostile work environment.”

K.G. v. Woodford County Board of Education
5:18-cv-00555-DCR-MAS
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“The defendant's motion for summary judgment [Record No. 138] is GRANTED and this action is DISMISSED and STRICKEN from the docket.”

United States v. Atkins
5:24-cr-00029-DCR-MAS
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“ORDERED that the defendant's motion to dismiss Count 1 of the indictment [Record No. 20] is DENIED.”

United States v. McDaniels
5:20-cr-00103-DCR-MAS
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“ORDERED that Defendant McDaniels' Motion to Dismiss Count 3 of the Indictment [Record No. 29] is DENIED.”

State of Tennessee v. Cardona
2:24-cv-00072-DCR-CJS
Preliminary injunction (plaintiff) Granted

“The motions for a preliminary injunction/stay filed by Tennessee, Kentucky, Ohio, Indiana, Virginia, and West Virginia [Record No. 19] and Christian Educators Association International and A.C. [Record No. 63] are GRANTED.”